Mariah Polido, Vinicius M Lopez, Guilherme Gonzaga da Silva, Marco A Del Lama, Rhainer Guillermo-Ferreira
{"title":"一只潜水甲虫的困境:性冲突对伦施统治的影响","authors":"Mariah Polido, Vinicius M Lopez, Guilherme Gonzaga da Silva, Marco A Del Lama, Rhainer Guillermo-Ferreira","doi":"10.1093/biolinnean/blad120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sexual conflict is believed to be an important evolutionary force driving phenotypic diversification, especially sexual dimorphism. Males of diving beetles sometimes resort to coercive tactics to increase their chances of successful reproduction, which can impose costs on females. Sexual conflict can also drive sexual size dimorphism (SSD), particularly in species where males are larger than females. In this context, Rensch’s rule states that SSD tends to increase with body size in species with male-biased SSD and decrease with body size in species with female-biased SSD. The role of sexual conflict in driving the evolution of the allometric relationships between males and females remains unclear. We addressed whether sexual conflict in diving beetles might drive SSD. We found that dytiscids do not follow Rensch’s rule, whereby the SSD is isometric in relationship to species body size. Species with adhesive pads (Dytiscinae) showed a more pronounced SSD than other diving beetle species. These results suggest that the presence of adhesive pads might reduce the force necessary to control female movement during copulation and drive the evolution of smaller males. The findings of this study provide new insights into the role of sexual conflict in driving the evolution of SSD in animals.","PeriodicalId":55373,"journal":{"name":"Biological Journal of the Linnean Society","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A diving beetle’s dilemma: the impact of sexual conflict on Rensch’s rule\",\"authors\":\"Mariah Polido, Vinicius M Lopez, Guilherme Gonzaga da Silva, Marco A Del Lama, Rhainer Guillermo-Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biolinnean/blad120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Sexual conflict is believed to be an important evolutionary force driving phenotypic diversification, especially sexual dimorphism. Males of diving beetles sometimes resort to coercive tactics to increase their chances of successful reproduction, which can impose costs on females. Sexual conflict can also drive sexual size dimorphism (SSD), particularly in species where males are larger than females. In this context, Rensch’s rule states that SSD tends to increase with body size in species with male-biased SSD and decrease with body size in species with female-biased SSD. The role of sexual conflict in driving the evolution of the allometric relationships between males and females remains unclear. We addressed whether sexual conflict in diving beetles might drive SSD. We found that dytiscids do not follow Rensch’s rule, whereby the SSD is isometric in relationship to species body size. Species with adhesive pads (Dytiscinae) showed a more pronounced SSD than other diving beetle species. These results suggest that the presence of adhesive pads might reduce the force necessary to control female movement during copulation and drive the evolution of smaller males. The findings of this study provide new insights into the role of sexual conflict in driving the evolution of SSD in animals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Journal of the Linnean Society\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Journal of the Linnean Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blad120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Journal of the Linnean Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blad120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A diving beetle’s dilemma: the impact of sexual conflict on Rensch’s rule
Abstract Sexual conflict is believed to be an important evolutionary force driving phenotypic diversification, especially sexual dimorphism. Males of diving beetles sometimes resort to coercive tactics to increase their chances of successful reproduction, which can impose costs on females. Sexual conflict can also drive sexual size dimorphism (SSD), particularly in species where males are larger than females. In this context, Rensch’s rule states that SSD tends to increase with body size in species with male-biased SSD and decrease with body size in species with female-biased SSD. The role of sexual conflict in driving the evolution of the allometric relationships between males and females remains unclear. We addressed whether sexual conflict in diving beetles might drive SSD. We found that dytiscids do not follow Rensch’s rule, whereby the SSD is isometric in relationship to species body size. Species with adhesive pads (Dytiscinae) showed a more pronounced SSD than other diving beetle species. These results suggest that the presence of adhesive pads might reduce the force necessary to control female movement during copulation and drive the evolution of smaller males. The findings of this study provide new insights into the role of sexual conflict in driving the evolution of SSD in animals.
期刊介绍:
The Biological Journal of the Linnean Society is a direct descendant of the oldest biological journal in the world, which published the epoch-making papers on evolution by Darwin and Wallace. The Journal specializes in evolution in the broadest sense and covers all taxonomic groups in all five kingdoms. It covers all the methods used to study evolution, whether whole-organism or molecular, practical or theoretical.d.