17世纪的作战计划以埃里克·达尔伯格的《战令》专辑为例。研究模式建议

IF 0.7 3区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Digital Scholarship in the Humanities Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1093/llc/fqad057
Mariusz Balcerek
{"title":"17世纪的作战计划以埃里克·达尔伯格的《战令》专辑为例。研究模式建议","authors":"Mariusz Balcerek","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqad057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article’s purpose is to present an original method of analysis of battle plans (orders of battle, battle orders, battle patterns, and battle settings) from the 17th century. We analysed 253 patterns from Eric Dahlbergh’s Album, which was a gift for King Charles XI of Sweden. In this text, we will take a look at the settings presented in Dahlbergh’s album. We hope that it will allow us to learn about the development process of the 17th-century arrays. What was the typical 17th-century order of battle like? Was it symmetrical or asymmetrical? How many throws and lines did it consist of? What was the ratio of the width to the depth of the army? Was the pattern composed of compact or linear elements? How did the formations (cavalry and infantry) stack up against each other? What was the frequency of intervals and higher tactical units? Thanks to the developed method, we obtained data for many patterns for the first time in history. They made it possible to characterize the patterns accurately and determine the time they changed. It is of paramount importance for the study of the European military in the early modern period.","PeriodicalId":45315,"journal":{"name":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The battle plans in the 17th century on the example of the ‘ordres de bataille’ album by Eric Dahlbergh. Research model proposal\",\"authors\":\"Mariusz Balcerek\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/llc/fqad057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article’s purpose is to present an original method of analysis of battle plans (orders of battle, battle orders, battle patterns, and battle settings) from the 17th century. We analysed 253 patterns from Eric Dahlbergh’s Album, which was a gift for King Charles XI of Sweden. In this text, we will take a look at the settings presented in Dahlbergh’s album. We hope that it will allow us to learn about the development process of the 17th-century arrays. What was the typical 17th-century order of battle like? Was it symmetrical or asymmetrical? How many throws and lines did it consist of? What was the ratio of the width to the depth of the army? Was the pattern composed of compact or linear elements? How did the formations (cavalry and infantry) stack up against each other? What was the frequency of intervals and higher tactical units? Thanks to the developed method, we obtained data for many patterns for the first time in history. They made it possible to characterize the patterns accurately and determine the time they changed. It is of paramount importance for the study of the European military in the early modern period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是提出一种分析17世纪以来战斗计划(战斗命令、战斗命令、战斗模式和战斗设置)的原始方法。我们分析了Eric Dahlbergh的专辑中的253个图案,这是送给瑞典国王查理十一世的礼物。在这篇文章中,我们将看一看Dahlbergh的专辑中呈现的设置。我们希望它能让我们了解17世纪阵列的发展过程。17世纪典型的战斗顺序是怎样的?是对称的还是不对称的?它由多少个投掷和线组成?军队的宽度和纵深的比例是多少?图案是由紧凑的还是线性的元素组成的?这些阵型(骑兵和步兵)是如何相互对抗的?间隔和更高的战术单位的频率是多少?由于开发的方法,我们在历史上第一次获得了许多模式的数据。它们使准确地描述这些模式并确定它们变化的时间成为可能。它对研究近代早期的欧洲军事具有极其重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The battle plans in the 17th century on the example of the ‘ordres de bataille’ album by Eric Dahlbergh. Research model proposal
Abstract The article’s purpose is to present an original method of analysis of battle plans (orders of battle, battle orders, battle patterns, and battle settings) from the 17th century. We analysed 253 patterns from Eric Dahlbergh’s Album, which was a gift for King Charles XI of Sweden. In this text, we will take a look at the settings presented in Dahlbergh’s album. We hope that it will allow us to learn about the development process of the 17th-century arrays. What was the typical 17th-century order of battle like? Was it symmetrical or asymmetrical? How many throws and lines did it consist of? What was the ratio of the width to the depth of the army? Was the pattern composed of compact or linear elements? How did the formations (cavalry and infantry) stack up against each other? What was the frequency of intervals and higher tactical units? Thanks to the developed method, we obtained data for many patterns for the first time in history. They made it possible to characterize the patterns accurately and determine the time they changed. It is of paramount importance for the study of the European military in the early modern period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: DSH or Digital Scholarship in the Humanities is an international, peer reviewed journal which publishes original contributions on all aspects of digital scholarship in the Humanities including, but not limited to, the field of what is currently called the Digital Humanities. Long and short papers report on theoretical, methodological, experimental, and applied research and include results of research projects, descriptions and evaluations of tools, techniques, and methodologies, and reports on work in progress. DSH also publishes reviews of books and resources. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities was previously known as Literary and Linguistic Computing.
期刊最新文献
Social network analysis of the Babylonian Talmud Ancient classical theatre from the digital humanities: a systematic review 2010–21 Language-based machine perception: linguistic perspectives on the compilation of captioning datasets Personality prediction via multi-task transformer architecture combined with image aesthetics Who wrote the first Constitutions of Freemasonry?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1