{"title":"R Stylo与《亨利五世》作者身份的确定","authors":"Hartmut Ilsemann","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqad067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over 25 years, Thomas Merriam has argued that Henry V was co-authored by Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe, and in his most recent publication ‘Is it time to reconsider Henry V’ (2023), he established differences in word length, which gives clear evidence. This article makes use of the R Stylo suite of stylometric tools and employs the Rolling Delta, Rolling Classify, and the General Imposters methods, all of which obtain the same result that Shakespeare used a Marlowe pretext in his composition of Henry V.","PeriodicalId":45315,"journal":{"name":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"R Stylo and the authorship determination of <i>Henry V</i>\",\"authors\":\"Hartmut Ilsemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/llc/fqad067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Over 25 years, Thomas Merriam has argued that Henry V was co-authored by Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe, and in his most recent publication ‘Is it time to reconsider Henry V’ (2023), he established differences in word length, which gives clear evidence. This article makes use of the R Stylo suite of stylometric tools and employs the Rolling Delta, Rolling Classify, and the General Imposters methods, all of which obtain the same result that Shakespeare used a Marlowe pretext in his composition of Henry V.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqad067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去的25年里，托马斯·梅里亚姆一直认为亨利五世是由莎士比亚和克里斯托弗·马洛共同创作的，在他最近的出版《是时候重新考虑亨利五世了吗》(2023)中，他建立了单词长度的差异，这提供了明确的证据。这篇文章使用了R Stylo系列的文体测量工具，并采用了Rolling Delta, Rolling classification和General im冒充方法，所有这些方法都得到了与莎士比亚在他的《亨利五世》中使用马洛借口相同的结果。
R Stylo and the authorship determination of Henry V
Abstract Over 25 years, Thomas Merriam has argued that Henry V was co-authored by Shakespeare and Christopher Marlowe, and in his most recent publication ‘Is it time to reconsider Henry V’ (2023), he established differences in word length, which gives clear evidence. This article makes use of the R Stylo suite of stylometric tools and employs the Rolling Delta, Rolling Classify, and the General Imposters methods, all of which obtain the same result that Shakespeare used a Marlowe pretext in his composition of Henry V.
期刊介绍：
DSH or Digital Scholarship in the Humanities is an international, peer reviewed journal which publishes original contributions on all aspects of digital scholarship in the Humanities including, but not limited to, the field of what is currently called the Digital Humanities. Long and short papers report on theoretical, methodological, experimental, and applied research and include results of research projects, descriptions and evaluations of tools, techniques, and methodologies, and reports on work in progress. DSH also publishes reviews of books and resources. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities was previously known as Literary and Linguistic Computing.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
