重新审视种族和社会经济的多样性?通过以色列教育政策和实践中的包容和评估来实现“他者化”

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Inclusive Education Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1080/13603116.2023.2266445
Tali Aderet-German
{"title":"重新审视种族和社会经济的多样性?通过以色列教育政策和实践中的包容和评估来实现“他者化”","authors":"Tali Aderet-German","doi":"10.1080/13603116.2023.2266445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper examines how Israeli integration and inclusion educational policies, and their associated assessment policies, might shape definitions of ‘the other’ and of those to be proactively included in mainstream education. Guided by critical policy analysis, this study adopts a comparative lens of the historical and the contemporary, comparing past and current national policy addressing diversity and how these policies address assessment. Drawing on interviews with teachers and principals from Israeli schools and on current and past educational policy documents, the study explores how the other is constructed within the context of two policies in two different eras. Analysis suggests that both policies have had a unidimensional view of their target students as the other, which was part of a group intended for inclusion. The intersectional perspective that teachers and principals had of their students and their efforts to personalise their educational response to attend to students’ individual needs attempted to bridge this unidimensional approach in practice, with varying success. Assessment practices and other aspects of the inclusion/integration policies analysed seemed to reinforce preexisting inequalities among students with different needs and from different socioeconomic backgrounds, further segregating the groups.KEYWORDS: Inclusive educationcritical policy analysisotheringdiversityassessment policyinclusion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsTali Aderet-GermanTali Aderet-German is an independent consultant, researcher and evaluator. She also serves as a part-time lecturer at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev's Specialization for School Evaluation Coordinators. Dr. Aderet-German has held postdoctoral positions at Ben-Gurion University and Aalborg University studying the intersection between policy and practice. With expertise in qualitative and mixed methods research, she has collaborated with diverse organisations, including NGOs and companies in healthcare, research and business sectors, as well as the Israeli Ministry of Education. Her PhD, carried out at the University of Haifa, focused on Educational Evaluation.","PeriodicalId":48025,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inclusive Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rewidening the lens to ethnic and socioeconomic diversity? ‘Othering’ through inclusion and assessment in Israeli educational policy and practice\",\"authors\":\"Tali Aderet-German\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13603116.2023.2266445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis paper examines how Israeli integration and inclusion educational policies, and their associated assessment policies, might shape definitions of ‘the other’ and of those to be proactively included in mainstream education. Guided by critical policy analysis, this study adopts a comparative lens of the historical and the contemporary, comparing past and current national policy addressing diversity and how these policies address assessment. Drawing on interviews with teachers and principals from Israeli schools and on current and past educational policy documents, the study explores how the other is constructed within the context of two policies in two different eras. Analysis suggests that both policies have had a unidimensional view of their target students as the other, which was part of a group intended for inclusion. The intersectional perspective that teachers and principals had of their students and their efforts to personalise their educational response to attend to students’ individual needs attempted to bridge this unidimensional approach in practice, with varying success. Assessment practices and other aspects of the inclusion/integration policies analysed seemed to reinforce preexisting inequalities among students with different needs and from different socioeconomic backgrounds, further segregating the groups.KEYWORDS: Inclusive educationcritical policy analysisotheringdiversityassessment policyinclusion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsTali Aderet-GermanTali Aderet-German is an independent consultant, researcher and evaluator. She also serves as a part-time lecturer at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev's Specialization for School Evaluation Coordinators. Dr. Aderet-German has held postdoctoral positions at Ben-Gurion University and Aalborg University studying the intersection between policy and practice. With expertise in qualitative and mixed methods research, she has collaborated with diverse organisations, including NGOs and companies in healthcare, research and business sectors, as well as the Israeli Ministry of Education. Her PhD, carried out at the University of Haifa, focused on Educational Evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Inclusive Education\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Inclusive Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2266445\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2266445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了以色列的融合和包容教育政策,以及与之相关的评估政策,如何塑造“他者”的定义,以及那些将被积极纳入主流教育的定义。在批判性政策分析的指导下,本研究采用了历史和当代的比较视角,比较了过去和现在解决多样性问题的国家政策以及这些政策如何解决评估问题。通过对以色列学校教师和校长的采访,以及当前和过去的教育政策文件,本研究探讨了如何在两个不同时代的两项政策背景下构建另一个。分析表明,这两项政策都有一个单一的观点,即他们的目标学生是另一个群体的一部分,旨在包容。教师和校长对学生的交叉视角,以及他们为满足学生的个性化需求而做出的个性化教育反应,试图在实践中弥合这种单一的方法,并取得了不同程度的成功。所分析的评估做法和包容/融合政策的其他方面似乎加强了具有不同需求和来自不同社会经济背景的学生之间先前存在的不平等,进一步隔离了群体。关键词:全纳教育关键政策分析其他多样性评估政策包容披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。tali Aderet-German是一名独立顾问、研究员和评估者。她还担任内盖夫本古里安大学学校评估协调员专业的兼职讲师。Aderet-German博士曾在本-古里安大学和奥尔堡大学担任博士后,研究政策与实践的交集。凭借在定性和混合方法研究方面的专业知识,她与各种组织合作,包括非政府组织和医疗保健、研究和商业部门的公司,以及以色列教育部。她在海法大学(University of Haifa)攻读博士学位,研究方向是教育评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rewidening the lens to ethnic and socioeconomic diversity? ‘Othering’ through inclusion and assessment in Israeli educational policy and practice
ABSTRACTThis paper examines how Israeli integration and inclusion educational policies, and their associated assessment policies, might shape definitions of ‘the other’ and of those to be proactively included in mainstream education. Guided by critical policy analysis, this study adopts a comparative lens of the historical and the contemporary, comparing past and current national policy addressing diversity and how these policies address assessment. Drawing on interviews with teachers and principals from Israeli schools and on current and past educational policy documents, the study explores how the other is constructed within the context of two policies in two different eras. Analysis suggests that both policies have had a unidimensional view of their target students as the other, which was part of a group intended for inclusion. The intersectional perspective that teachers and principals had of their students and their efforts to personalise their educational response to attend to students’ individual needs attempted to bridge this unidimensional approach in practice, with varying success. Assessment practices and other aspects of the inclusion/integration policies analysed seemed to reinforce preexisting inequalities among students with different needs and from different socioeconomic backgrounds, further segregating the groups.KEYWORDS: Inclusive educationcritical policy analysisotheringdiversityassessment policyinclusion Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsTali Aderet-GermanTali Aderet-German is an independent consultant, researcher and evaluator. She also serves as a part-time lecturer at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev's Specialization for School Evaluation Coordinators. Dr. Aderet-German has held postdoctoral positions at Ben-Gurion University and Aalborg University studying the intersection between policy and practice. With expertise in qualitative and mixed methods research, she has collaborated with diverse organisations, including NGOs and companies in healthcare, research and business sectors, as well as the Israeli Ministry of Education. Her PhD, carried out at the University of Haifa, focused on Educational Evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Inclusive Education
International Journal of Inclusive Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Inclusive Education provides a strategic forum for international and multi-disciplinary dialogue on inclusive education for all educators and educational policy-makers concerned with the form and nature of schools, universities and technical colleges. Papers published are original, refereed, multi-disciplinary research into pedagogies, curricula, organizational structures, policy-making, administration and cultures to include all students in education. The journal does not accept enrolment in school, college or university as a measure of inclusion. The focus is upon the nature of exclusion and on research, policy and practices that generate greater options for all people in education and beyond.
期刊最新文献
‘We need to change our way of thinking about education’: a thematic analysis of university staff’s experience supporting autistic students in France Can we talk? A correspondence study to examine responsiveness of physical educators to requests for a phone call from parents of children with disabilities Towards inclusion: a comparative examination of the status of disability acts in South Asia Parents and the gender and sexual violence assemblage in a rural school Transformative teaching around the world: Stories of cultural impact, technology integration, and innovative pedagogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1