生物材料的特征,参考生物相容性,专用于患者特定的手指植入物

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02156-2022-02
Adam Byrski, Magdalena Kopernik, Łukasz Major, Katarzyna Kasperkiewicz, Marcin Dyner, Juergen M. Lackner, David Lumenta, Roman Major
{"title":"生物材料的特征,参考生物相容性,专用于患者特定的手指植入物","authors":"Adam Byrski, Magdalena Kopernik, Łukasz Major, Katarzyna Kasperkiewicz, Marcin Dyner, Juergen M. Lackner, David Lumenta, Roman Major","doi":"10.37190/abb-02156-2022-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The research was focused on determining basic mechanical properties, surface and phase structure taking into consideration basic cytotoxicity analysis towards human cells. Methods Biological tests were performed on human C-12302 fibroblasts cells using 3D-printed Ti6Al4V alloy (Ti64), produced by laser-based powder bed fusion (LB-PBF) and Alumina Toughened Zirconia 20 (ATZ20), produced by lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM). Surface modifications included electropolishing, and hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite/zinc coating. Structure analysis was carried out using a variety of techniques such as X-Ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), followed by mechanical properties evaluation using nanoindentation testing. Results Samples subjected to surface modifications showed diversity among surface and phase structure and mechanical properties. However, the cytotoxicity towards tested cells was not significantly higher than the control. Though, a trend was noted among the materials analysed, indicating that HAp/Zn coating on Ti64 and ATZ20 resulted in the best biological performance Conclusions Hydroxyapatite coating on Ti64 and ATZ20 resulted in the best biological properties. Tested materials are suitable for in vivo toxicity testing.","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of biomaterials with reference to biocompatibility dedicated for patient-specific finger implants\",\"authors\":\"Adam Byrski, Magdalena Kopernik, Łukasz Major, Katarzyna Kasperkiewicz, Marcin Dyner, Juergen M. Lackner, David Lumenta, Roman Major\",\"doi\":\"10.37190/abb-02156-2022-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The research was focused on determining basic mechanical properties, surface and phase structure taking into consideration basic cytotoxicity analysis towards human cells. Methods Biological tests were performed on human C-12302 fibroblasts cells using 3D-printed Ti6Al4V alloy (Ti64), produced by laser-based powder bed fusion (LB-PBF) and Alumina Toughened Zirconia 20 (ATZ20), produced by lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM). Surface modifications included electropolishing, and hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite/zinc coating. Structure analysis was carried out using a variety of techniques such as X-Ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), followed by mechanical properties evaluation using nanoindentation testing. Results Samples subjected to surface modifications showed diversity among surface and phase structure and mechanical properties. However, the cytotoxicity towards tested cells was not significantly higher than the control. Though, a trend was noted among the materials analysed, indicating that HAp/Zn coating on Ti64 and ATZ20 resulted in the best biological performance Conclusions Hydroxyapatite coating on Ti64 and ATZ20 resulted in the best biological properties. Tested materials are suitable for in vivo toxicity testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02156-2022-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02156-2022-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在对人体细胞进行基本细胞毒性分析的基础上,研究其基本力学性能、表面和相结构。方法采用激光粉末床熔融(LB-PBF)法制备Ti6Al4V合金(Ti64)和光刻陶瓷制造(LCM)法制备氧化铝增韧氧化锆20 (ATZ20),对人C-12302成纤维细胞进行生物实验。表面改性包括电抛光、羟基磷灰石或羟基磷灰石/锌涂层。使用x射线衍射、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)等多种技术进行了结构分析,随后使用纳米压痕测试进行了力学性能评估。结果经表面改性后的样品表面、相结构和力学性能呈现多样性。然而,对被试细胞的细胞毒性并不显著高于对照组。结论羟基磷灰石涂层在Ti64和ATZ20表面具有最佳的生物学性能。被试材料适用于体内毒性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization of biomaterials with reference to biocompatibility dedicated for patient-specific finger implants
Purpose The research was focused on determining basic mechanical properties, surface and phase structure taking into consideration basic cytotoxicity analysis towards human cells. Methods Biological tests were performed on human C-12302 fibroblasts cells using 3D-printed Ti6Al4V alloy (Ti64), produced by laser-based powder bed fusion (LB-PBF) and Alumina Toughened Zirconia 20 (ATZ20), produced by lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM). Surface modifications included electropolishing, and hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite/zinc coating. Structure analysis was carried out using a variety of techniques such as X-Ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), followed by mechanical properties evaluation using nanoindentation testing. Results Samples subjected to surface modifications showed diversity among surface and phase structure and mechanical properties. However, the cytotoxicity towards tested cells was not significantly higher than the control. Though, a trend was noted among the materials analysed, indicating that HAp/Zn coating on Ti64 and ATZ20 resulted in the best biological performance Conclusions Hydroxyapatite coating on Ti64 and ATZ20 resulted in the best biological properties. Tested materials are suitable for in vivo toxicity testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of biomaterials with reference to biocompatibility dedicated for patient-specific finger implants Dynamic-passive correction of hallux valgus and associated static foot deformities Quantitative evaluation of stereoscopic augmented reality visualization using an optical see-through head-mounted display Analysis of Muscle Activity During Rowing Stroke Phases Experimental research of energy absorbing structures within helmet samples made with the additive manufacturing method - preliminary study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1