用技术测量和不适等级评价助听器的脉冲噪声降低

IF 1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS Acta Acustica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1051/aacus/2023042
Hendrik Husstedt, Wiebke Hilgerdenaar, Marlitt Frenz, Florian Denk, Jürgen Tchorz
{"title":"用技术测量和不适等级评价助听器的脉冲噪声降低","authors":"Hendrik Husstedt, Wiebke Hilgerdenaar, Marlitt Frenz, Florian Denk, Jürgen Tchorz","doi":"10.1051/aacus/2023042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Short, impulse-like sounds such as slamming of a door or rattle of dishes can be uncomfortable for hearing aid users. Therefore, many hearing aids provide impulse (or transient) noise reduction (INR) that should reduce loud and short sounds without impairing desired signals. In this work, we want to address the question whether hearing aid users require this type of signal processing to experience impulse sounds similarly as normal-hearing listeners. For this purpose, we evaluated INR in six commercially available hearing aids with technical measurements and with test subjects. During the technical evaluation, we presented seven different impulse signals to the hearing aids attached to a head and torso simulator (HATS) and determined the C-weighted peak sound pressure levels ( L C,peak ) at the output in different configurations. For the evaluation with test subjects, the discomfort of the same impulse sounds was rated by 24 hearing-impaired and 20 normal-hearing subjects. All subjects rated the discomfort unaided, and the hearing-impaired subjects also while successively wearing all six hearing aids with and without activated INR. As a main conclusion, hearing aid users without INR did not experience more discomfort compared to normal-hearing listeners for most of the impulse signals tested including the most uncomfortable ones, but INR further reduced experienced discomfort. Moreover, the technical measurements were correlated with the subjective ratings on discomfort.","PeriodicalId":48486,"journal":{"name":"Acta Acustica","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of impulse noise reduction in hearing aids with technical measurements and ratings of discomfort\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Husstedt, Wiebke Hilgerdenaar, Marlitt Frenz, Florian Denk, Jürgen Tchorz\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/aacus/2023042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Short, impulse-like sounds such as slamming of a door or rattle of dishes can be uncomfortable for hearing aid users. Therefore, many hearing aids provide impulse (or transient) noise reduction (INR) that should reduce loud and short sounds without impairing desired signals. In this work, we want to address the question whether hearing aid users require this type of signal processing to experience impulse sounds similarly as normal-hearing listeners. For this purpose, we evaluated INR in six commercially available hearing aids with technical measurements and with test subjects. During the technical evaluation, we presented seven different impulse signals to the hearing aids attached to a head and torso simulator (HATS) and determined the C-weighted peak sound pressure levels ( L C,peak ) at the output in different configurations. For the evaluation with test subjects, the discomfort of the same impulse sounds was rated by 24 hearing-impaired and 20 normal-hearing subjects. All subjects rated the discomfort unaided, and the hearing-impaired subjects also while successively wearing all six hearing aids with and without activated INR. As a main conclusion, hearing aid users without INR did not experience more discomfort compared to normal-hearing listeners for most of the impulse signals tested including the most uncomfortable ones, but INR further reduced experienced discomfort. Moreover, the technical measurements were correlated with the subjective ratings on discomfort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Acustica\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Acustica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2023042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Acustica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2023042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

短而冲动的声音,如摔门声或盘子的嘎嘎声,可能会让助听器使用者感到不舒服。因此,许多助听器提供脉冲(或瞬态)降噪(INR),应减少响亮和短的声音,而不损害所需的信号。在这项工作中,我们想要解决的问题是,助听器用户是否需要这种类型的信号处理来体验与正常听力听众相似的脉冲声音。为此,我们通过技术测量和测试对象对六种市售助听器的INR进行了评估。在技术评估过程中,我们将7种不同的脉冲信号提供给附加在头部和躯干模拟器(HATS)上的助听器,并确定了不同配置下输出处的C加权峰值声压级(L C,peak)。在对被试的评估中,24名听力受损者和20名听力正常者对相同的脉冲声音的不适程度进行了评分。所有受试者在没有助听器的情况下都对不舒服程度进行了评分,听力受损的受试者在连续佩戴助听器(有或没有激活INR)时也是如此。作为一个主要结论,对于大多数测试的脉冲信号,包括最不舒服的脉冲信号,与听力正常的听者相比,没有INR的助听器使用者并没有感受到更多的不适,但INR进一步减少了所经历的不适。此外,技术测量与不适的主观评分相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of impulse noise reduction in hearing aids with technical measurements and ratings of discomfort
Short, impulse-like sounds such as slamming of a door or rattle of dishes can be uncomfortable for hearing aid users. Therefore, many hearing aids provide impulse (or transient) noise reduction (INR) that should reduce loud and short sounds without impairing desired signals. In this work, we want to address the question whether hearing aid users require this type of signal processing to experience impulse sounds similarly as normal-hearing listeners. For this purpose, we evaluated INR in six commercially available hearing aids with technical measurements and with test subjects. During the technical evaluation, we presented seven different impulse signals to the hearing aids attached to a head and torso simulator (HATS) and determined the C-weighted peak sound pressure levels ( L C,peak ) at the output in different configurations. For the evaluation with test subjects, the discomfort of the same impulse sounds was rated by 24 hearing-impaired and 20 normal-hearing subjects. All subjects rated the discomfort unaided, and the hearing-impaired subjects also while successively wearing all six hearing aids with and without activated INR. As a main conclusion, hearing aid users without INR did not experience more discomfort compared to normal-hearing listeners for most of the impulse signals tested including the most uncomfortable ones, but INR further reduced experienced discomfort. Moreover, the technical measurements were correlated with the subjective ratings on discomfort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Acustica
Acta Acustica ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Acustica, the Journal of the European Acoustics Association (EAA). After the publication of its Journal Acta Acustica from 1993 to 1995, the EAA published Acta Acustica united with Acustica from 1996 to 2019. From 2020, the EAA decided to publish a journal in full Open Access. See Article Processing charges. Acta Acustica reports on original scientific research in acoustics and on engineering applications. The journal considers review papers, scientific papers, technical and applied papers, short communications, letters to the editor. From time to time, special issues and review articles are also published. For book reviews or doctoral thesis abstracts, please contact the Editor in Chief.
期刊最新文献
Auralization based on multi-perspective ambisonic room impulse responses Amplitude-dependent modal coefficients accounting for localized nonlinear losses in a time-domain integration of woodwind model A direct-hybrid CFD/CAA method based on lattice Boltzmann and acoustic perturbation equations Acta Acustica: State of art and achievements after 3 years Impact of wearing a head-mounted display on localization accuracy of real sound sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1