碰撞面积和速度对动力两轮车碰撞死亡和受伤风险的影响

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.4271/09-11-02-0010
P. Terranova, F. Guo, Miguel A. Perez
{"title":"碰撞面积和速度对动力两轮车碰撞死亡和受伤风险的影响","authors":"P. Terranova, F. Guo, Miguel A. Perez","doi":"10.4271/09-11-02-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the fatality risk of powered two-wheeler (PTW) riders across different impact orientations while controlling for different opponent vehicle (OV) types. For the crash configurations with higher fatality rate, the secondary objective was to create an initial speed–fatality prediction model specific to the United States. Data from the NHTSA Crash Reporting Sampling System and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System from 2017 to 2020 was used to estimate the odds of the different possible vehicle combinations and orientations in PTW–OV crashes. Binary logistic regression was then used to model the speed–fatality risk relationship for the configurations with the highest fatality odds. Results showed that collisions with heavy trucks were more likely to be fatal for PTW riders than those with other OV types. Additionally, the most dangerous impact orientations were found to be those where the PTW impacted the OVs front or sides, with fatality odds, respectively, four and five times higher than when the OV rear-end was impacted. The high variability in the odds of different crash configurations suggests the importance of considering the impact orientation factor in future injury prediction models. The speed–fatality prediction models developed for head-on and side crashes could provide an initial tool to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced rider assistance systems and other safety countermeasures in the United States, particularly those that result in speed reductions.</div>","PeriodicalId":42847,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact Area and Speed Effects on Powered Two-Wheeler Crash Fatality and Injury Risk\",\"authors\":\"P. Terranova, F. Guo, Miguel A. Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/09-11-02-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the fatality risk of powered two-wheeler (PTW) riders across different impact orientations while controlling for different opponent vehicle (OV) types. For the crash configurations with higher fatality rate, the secondary objective was to create an initial speed–fatality prediction model specific to the United States. Data from the NHTSA Crash Reporting Sampling System and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System from 2017 to 2020 was used to estimate the odds of the different possible vehicle combinations and orientations in PTW–OV crashes. Binary logistic regression was then used to model the speed–fatality risk relationship for the configurations with the highest fatality odds. Results showed that collisions with heavy trucks were more likely to be fatal for PTW riders than those with other OV types. Additionally, the most dangerous impact orientations were found to be those where the PTW impacted the OVs front or sides, with fatality odds, respectively, four and five times higher than when the OV rear-end was impacted. The high variability in the odds of different crash configurations suggests the importance of considering the impact orientation factor in future injury prediction models. The speed–fatality prediction models developed for head-on and side crashes could provide an initial tool to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced rider assistance systems and other safety countermeasures in the United States, particularly those that result in speed reductions.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/09-11-02-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/09-11-02-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是在控制不同对手车辆(OV)类型的情况下,评估动力两轮车(PTW)车手在不同撞击方向上的死亡风险。对于具有较高死亡率的碰撞配置,次要目标是创建特定于美国的初始速度-死亡预测模型。来自NHTSA碰撞报告抽样系统和死亡分析报告系统2017年至2020年的数据用于估计PTW-OV碰撞中不同可能车辆组合和方向的概率。然后使用二元逻辑回归对死亡率最高的配置进行速度-死亡风险关系建模。结果表明,与重型卡车的碰撞对PTW车手比其他OV类型的车手更有可能致命。此外,发现最危险的撞击方向是那些PTW撞击外轴前部或侧面的方向,其死亡率分别比外轴尾部撞击时高4倍和5倍。不同碰撞形式的概率的高度可变性表明在未来的损伤预测模型中考虑碰撞方向因素的重要性。为正面和侧面碰撞开发的速度死亡预测模型可以提供一个初步工具,用于评估美国先进的驾驶员辅助系统和其他安全对策的有效性,特别是那些导致减速的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact Area and Speed Effects on Powered Two-Wheeler Crash Fatality and Injury Risk
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the fatality risk of powered two-wheeler (PTW) riders across different impact orientations while controlling for different opponent vehicle (OV) types. For the crash configurations with higher fatality rate, the secondary objective was to create an initial speed–fatality prediction model specific to the United States. Data from the NHTSA Crash Reporting Sampling System and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System from 2017 to 2020 was used to estimate the odds of the different possible vehicle combinations and orientations in PTW–OV crashes. Binary logistic regression was then used to model the speed–fatality risk relationship for the configurations with the highest fatality odds. Results showed that collisions with heavy trucks were more likely to be fatal for PTW riders than those with other OV types. Additionally, the most dangerous impact orientations were found to be those where the PTW impacted the OVs front or sides, with fatality odds, respectively, four and five times higher than when the OV rear-end was impacted. The high variability in the odds of different crash configurations suggests the importance of considering the impact orientation factor in future injury prediction models. The speed–fatality prediction models developed for head-on and side crashes could provide an initial tool to evaluate the effectiveness of advanced rider assistance systems and other safety countermeasures in the United States, particularly those that result in speed reductions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on Ship Squat in Intermediate Channel Study of Vehicle-Based Metrics for Assessing the Severity of Side Impacts Distilled Routing Transformer for Driving Behavior Prediction Reviewers Thermal Modeling of the Electric Vehicle Fire Hazard Effects on Parking Building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1