口音比语言更响亮吗?语言语音特征对欺骗检测的感知

IF 2 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Language and Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1177/0261927x231209428
Lyndsay R. Woolridge, Amy-May Leach, Chelsea Blake, Elizabeth Elliott
{"title":"口音比语言更响亮吗?语言语音特征对欺骗检测的感知","authors":"Lyndsay R. Woolridge, Amy-May Leach, Chelsea Blake, Elizabeth Elliott","doi":"10.1177/0261927x231209428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using videotaped interviews of beginner, intermediate, and native English speakers, we examined whether observers’ perceptions of linguistic measures of accentedness, temporal fluency, lexicogrammar, and comprehensibility influenced their deception detection. We found that observers could detect differences in speech characteristics between proficiency levels, and that they were less able to detect deception among beginner speakers compared to intermediate and native speakers. Beginner speakers were also afforded more of a truth bias compared to intermediate, but not native speakers. Interestingly, observers’ backgrounds, including prior exposure to non-native speech, did not influence their judgments. Rather, observers’ discrimination and response bias appeared to be most affected by speakers’ fluency and comprehensibility, respectively. This study is one of the first to separate and directly compare perceptions of linguistic characteristics and their role in deception detection. Findings raise questions about equitable deception detection in legal settings.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"127 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Accents Speak Louder Than Words? Perceptions of Linguistic Speech Characteristics on Deception Detection\",\"authors\":\"Lyndsay R. Woolridge, Amy-May Leach, Chelsea Blake, Elizabeth Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0261927x231209428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using videotaped interviews of beginner, intermediate, and native English speakers, we examined whether observers’ perceptions of linguistic measures of accentedness, temporal fluency, lexicogrammar, and comprehensibility influenced their deception detection. We found that observers could detect differences in speech characteristics between proficiency levels, and that they were less able to detect deception among beginner speakers compared to intermediate and native speakers. Beginner speakers were also afforded more of a truth bias compared to intermediate, but not native speakers. Interestingly, observers’ backgrounds, including prior exposure to non-native speech, did not influence their judgments. Rather, observers’ discrimination and response bias appeared to be most affected by speakers’ fluency and comprehensibility, respectively. This study is one of the first to separate and directly compare perceptions of linguistic characteristics and their role in deception detection. Findings raise questions about equitable deception detection in legal settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"127 20\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x231209428\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x231209428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对英语初学者、中级和母语为英语的人进行录像采访,我们研究了观察者对口音、时间流畅性、词汇语法和可理解性等语言指标的感知是否影响了他们的欺骗检测。我们发现,观察者可以察觉到不同熟练程度之间的语言特征差异,而且与中级和母语人士相比,他们更不容易察觉到初学者的欺骗行为。初学者也比中级者有更多的真理偏见,但不是母语者。有趣的是,观察者的背景,包括之前接触过的非母语语言,并没有影响他们的判断。相反,观察者的歧视和反应偏差似乎分别受说话者的流利性和可理解性的影响最大。这项研究是第一个分离并直接比较语言特征感知及其在欺骗检测中的作用的研究之一。调查结果提出了在法律环境中公平的欺骗检测问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Accents Speak Louder Than Words? Perceptions of Linguistic Speech Characteristics on Deception Detection
Using videotaped interviews of beginner, intermediate, and native English speakers, we examined whether observers’ perceptions of linguistic measures of accentedness, temporal fluency, lexicogrammar, and comprehensibility influenced their deception detection. We found that observers could detect differences in speech characteristics between proficiency levels, and that they were less able to detect deception among beginner speakers compared to intermediate and native speakers. Beginner speakers were also afforded more of a truth bias compared to intermediate, but not native speakers. Interestingly, observers’ backgrounds, including prior exposure to non-native speech, did not influence their judgments. Rather, observers’ discrimination and response bias appeared to be most affected by speakers’ fluency and comprehensibility, respectively. This study is one of the first to separate and directly compare perceptions of linguistic characteristics and their role in deception detection. Findings raise questions about equitable deception detection in legal settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Language and Social Psychology explores the social dimensions of language and the linguistic implications of social life. Articles are drawn from a wide range of disciplines, including linguistics, cognitive science, sociology, communication, psychology, education, and anthropology. The journal provides complete and balanced coverage of the latest developments and advances through original, full-length articles, short research notes, and special features as Debates, Courses and Conferences, and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Announcing International Symposium on Intergroup Communication (ISIC3) Presence and Pronouns: An Exploratory Investigation into the Language of Social VR The Grammar of Persuasion: A Meta-Analytic Review Disconfirming the Role of Nouns as Linguistic Cues of Subsequent Behavior Reminding May Not Be Enough: Overcoming the Male Dominance of the Generic Masculine How Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact May Shape the Communication of Discrimination Toward Migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1