激励跨学科研究合作:来自澳大利亚的证据

IF 2.7 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1080/1360080x.2023.2267719
Joshua Newman
{"title":"激励跨学科研究合作:来自澳大利亚的证据","authors":"Joshua Newman","doi":"10.1080/1360080x.2023.2267719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a popular perception that interdisciplinary research collaboration can yield benefits to knowledge production, from improvements to creativity to advances in addressing real-world problems. However, studies into interdisciplinarity frequently point to material obstacles, such as burdensome time and resource requirements, difficulties in publishing, and scarce opportunities for grant funding, which imply that incentives or rewards might be required to motivate academics to collaborate with colleagues across research disciplines. This article reports the results of a survey of academics and interviews with senior university leaders at a large research-intensive university in Australia, which indicate a major difference of opinion on how to incentivise interdisciplinary collaboration. While survey respondents largely emphasised material concerns, university leaders cited cultural change as a preferred strategy. If interdisciplinary research collaboration is desired, this gap between the perceptions of academics, who do the research, and university leaders, who control the resources, will need to be bridged.","PeriodicalId":51489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incentivising interdisciplinary research collaboration: evidence from Australia\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1360080x.2023.2267719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a popular perception that interdisciplinary research collaboration can yield benefits to knowledge production, from improvements to creativity to advances in addressing real-world problems. However, studies into interdisciplinarity frequently point to material obstacles, such as burdensome time and resource requirements, difficulties in publishing, and scarce opportunities for grant funding, which imply that incentives or rewards might be required to motivate academics to collaborate with colleagues across research disciplines. This article reports the results of a survey of academics and interviews with senior university leaders at a large research-intensive university in Australia, which indicate a major difference of opinion on how to incentivise interdisciplinary collaboration. While survey respondents largely emphasised material concerns, university leaders cited cultural change as a preferred strategy. If interdisciplinary research collaboration is desired, this gap between the perceptions of academics, who do the research, and university leaders, who control the resources, will need to be bridged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2023.2267719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2023.2267719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有一种普遍的看法认为,跨学科研究合作可以为知识生产带来好处,从改进创造力到解决现实世界问题的进步。然而,跨学科研究经常指出物质障碍,例如繁重的时间和资源需求、出版困难以及获得资助的机会稀缺,这意味着可能需要激励或奖励来激励学者与跨研究学科的同事合作。本文报告了一项对澳大利亚一所大型研究型大学的学者和高级大学领导的调查结果,这表明在如何激励跨学科合作方面存在重大分歧。虽然受访者大多强调物质方面的考虑,但大学领导认为文化变革是首选策略。如果希望开展跨学科研究合作,就需要弥合从事研究的学者和控制资源的大学领导之间的观念差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incentivising interdisciplinary research collaboration: evidence from Australia
There is a popular perception that interdisciplinary research collaboration can yield benefits to knowledge production, from improvements to creativity to advances in addressing real-world problems. However, studies into interdisciplinarity frequently point to material obstacles, such as burdensome time and resource requirements, difficulties in publishing, and scarce opportunities for grant funding, which imply that incentives or rewards might be required to motivate academics to collaborate with colleagues across research disciplines. This article reports the results of a survey of academics and interviews with senior university leaders at a large research-intensive university in Australia, which indicate a major difference of opinion on how to incentivise interdisciplinary collaboration. While survey respondents largely emphasised material concerns, university leaders cited cultural change as a preferred strategy. If interdisciplinary research collaboration is desired, this gap between the perceptions of academics, who do the research, and university leaders, who control the resources, will need to be bridged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management is an international journal of professional experience and ideas in post-secondary education. It is a must read for those seeking to influence educational policy making. The journal also aims to be of use to managers and senior academic staff who seek to place their work and interests in a broad context and influence educational policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the notion of feminine leadership in Kuwait’s private universities Using self-determination theory as a lens to create sustainable futures for teaching and education focused academics in higher education in Australia What makes a Thesis by Publication? An international study of policy requirements and restrictions Growth mindsets in academics and academia: a review of influence and interventions Academic excellence initiatives: global perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1