淋巴瘤的生化反应评价:提出一个评分系统

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Uhod-Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.4999/uhod.236946
Efe Cem Erdat
{"title":"淋巴瘤的生化反应评价:提出一个评分系统","authors":"Efe Cem Erdat","doi":"10.4999/uhod.236946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lymphomas encompass various lymphoid malignancies, although they are classified and evaluated in a similar manner. Prognostic stratification of lymphomas employs biochemical tests; however, these tests do not offer a viable means of assessing response. We included 108 patients with lymphoma who underwent treatment at the Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, between January 2015 and December 2017. Patients were grouped into good and poor responders, and changes in biochemical parameters were assessed for their utility in evaluating patient response. We evaluated the proposed scoring system’s effect size using Cramer’s V test. Fifty-seven patients were male, 51 patients were female, and the median age of the patients was 50 years. Twenty-seven patients had HL, 72 patients had B-cell NHL, and 9 patients had T-cell NHL. Fifty-three patients had stage IV, nine patients had stage III, 23 patients had stage II, and 22 patients had stage I disease. Levels of total protein (from 7.12 to 6.79 gr/ dL, p< 0.01), ß2-microglobulin (from 2287 to 2039 ng/mL, p= 0.07), and lactate dehydrogenase (from 297.8 to 230.1 U/L, p< 0.01) decreased in patients with good response, whereas nothing significant was found in patients with poor response. After transforming the parameters, we proposed a 4-point ordinal system comprising total protein, ß2-microglobulin, and lactate dehydrogenase values. Subsequent analysis demonstrated a nearly high effect size (Cramer’s V 0.461) and significance in logistic regression (p< 0.01). Our study presents the first scoring system for response assessment in lymphoma using biochemical tests. Further research is necessary to validate our scoring system. Keywords: Lymphomas, Response evaluation, Biochemistry, Basic scoring","PeriodicalId":49402,"journal":{"name":"Uhod-Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochemical Response Evaluation on Lymphomas: Proposing a Scoring System\",\"authors\":\"Efe Cem Erdat\",\"doi\":\"10.4999/uhod.236946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lymphomas encompass various lymphoid malignancies, although they are classified and evaluated in a similar manner. Prognostic stratification of lymphomas employs biochemical tests; however, these tests do not offer a viable means of assessing response. We included 108 patients with lymphoma who underwent treatment at the Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, between January 2015 and December 2017. Patients were grouped into good and poor responders, and changes in biochemical parameters were assessed for their utility in evaluating patient response. We evaluated the proposed scoring system’s effect size using Cramer’s V test. Fifty-seven patients were male, 51 patients were female, and the median age of the patients was 50 years. Twenty-seven patients had HL, 72 patients had B-cell NHL, and 9 patients had T-cell NHL. Fifty-three patients had stage IV, nine patients had stage III, 23 patients had stage II, and 22 patients had stage I disease. Levels of total protein (from 7.12 to 6.79 gr/ dL, p< 0.01), ß2-microglobulin (from 2287 to 2039 ng/mL, p= 0.07), and lactate dehydrogenase (from 297.8 to 230.1 U/L, p< 0.01) decreased in patients with good response, whereas nothing significant was found in patients with poor response. After transforming the parameters, we proposed a 4-point ordinal system comprising total protein, ß2-microglobulin, and lactate dehydrogenase values. Subsequent analysis demonstrated a nearly high effect size (Cramer’s V 0.461) and significance in logistic regression (p< 0.01). Our study presents the first scoring system for response assessment in lymphoma using biochemical tests. Further research is necessary to validate our scoring system. Keywords: Lymphomas, Response evaluation, Biochemistry, Basic scoring\",\"PeriodicalId\":49402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uhod-Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uhod-Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4999/uhod.236946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uhod-Uluslararasi Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4999/uhod.236946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

淋巴瘤包括各种淋巴样恶性肿瘤,尽管它们的分类和评估方式相似。淋巴瘤的预后分层采用生化试验;然而,这些测试并不能提供评估反应的可行方法。我们纳入了2015年1月至2017年12月期间在Hacettepe大学肿瘤内科接受治疗的108例淋巴瘤患者。将患者分为良好反应和不良反应,并评估生化参数的变化对评估患者反应的效用。我们使用Cramer 's V检验评估了所提出的评分系统的效应量。男性57例,女性51例,中位年龄50岁。27例为HL, 72例为b细胞NHL, 9例为t细胞NHL。53名患者处于第四阶段,9名患者处于第三阶段,23名患者处于第二阶段,22名患者处于第一阶段。总蛋白水平(7.12至6.79克/分升,p<0.01), ß - 2微球蛋白(从2287到2039 ng/mL, p= 0.07),乳酸脱氢酶(从297.8到230.1 U/L, p= 0.07;0.01),而不良反应组无显著差异。在对参数进行变换后,我们提出了一个包含总蛋白、ß - 2微球蛋白和乳酸脱氢酶值的4点顺序系统。随后的分析表明,效应量接近高(Cramer’s V 0.461),逻辑回归显著(p<0.01)。我们的研究提出了第一个使用生化测试评估淋巴瘤反应的评分系统。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的评分系统。关键词:淋巴瘤,反应评价,生物化学,基础评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biochemical Response Evaluation on Lymphomas: Proposing a Scoring System
Lymphomas encompass various lymphoid malignancies, although they are classified and evaluated in a similar manner. Prognostic stratification of lymphomas employs biochemical tests; however, these tests do not offer a viable means of assessing response. We included 108 patients with lymphoma who underwent treatment at the Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University, between January 2015 and December 2017. Patients were grouped into good and poor responders, and changes in biochemical parameters were assessed for their utility in evaluating patient response. We evaluated the proposed scoring system’s effect size using Cramer’s V test. Fifty-seven patients were male, 51 patients were female, and the median age of the patients was 50 years. Twenty-seven patients had HL, 72 patients had B-cell NHL, and 9 patients had T-cell NHL. Fifty-three patients had stage IV, nine patients had stage III, 23 patients had stage II, and 22 patients had stage I disease. Levels of total protein (from 7.12 to 6.79 gr/ dL, p< 0.01), ß2-microglobulin (from 2287 to 2039 ng/mL, p= 0.07), and lactate dehydrogenase (from 297.8 to 230.1 U/L, p< 0.01) decreased in patients with good response, whereas nothing significant was found in patients with poor response. After transforming the parameters, we proposed a 4-point ordinal system comprising total protein, ß2-microglobulin, and lactate dehydrogenase values. Subsequent analysis demonstrated a nearly high effect size (Cramer’s V 0.461) and significance in logistic regression (p< 0.01). Our study presents the first scoring system for response assessment in lymphoma using biochemical tests. Further research is necessary to validate our scoring system. Keywords: Lymphomas, Response evaluation, Biochemistry, Basic scoring
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Target of Publication is the public representation of new scientific results of fundamental, problem-oriented, and search scientific investigations; analytical articles and reviews by actual scientific problems of coal mining industry, short reports in the field of coal mining industry, including the results of work of scientific meetings, conferences, summit’s and congresses in the field of mining. The basic purpose of the journal is the promotion of innovative activity in the coal mining industry by highlighting and discussing the results of basic and applied research, the experience in applying results of innovation for the development of the Russian coal mining. The most important tasks of the journal are: the generalization of scientific and practical achievements of specialists in the field of coal mining industry, specializing in the implementation of promising basic and applied research and development of priorities of high technologies; the scientific concept of the publication; the publication of the latest achievements in the field of innovation in coal mining industry. The journal lays special emphasis on methodical elaborations, analytical investigations in the sphere of coal mining. Targets of Journal are in publication of new results of scientific investigations performed by scientists, post-graduate students, and doctoral candidates performed by from higher schools, Russian Academy of Sciences, other scientific organizations of Russia, CIS countries, and foreign universities
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Overexpression and 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters in Patients with Gastric Cancer, and Prognostic Importance of HDAC Overexpression Prognostic Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake of Bone Marrow on PET/CT in Patients with Limited Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer Systemic Inflammation Score for Predicting Radiation-Induced Trismus and Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw Rates in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Evaluation of the Association Between CRNDE Plasma Expression Level, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Variants in Patients with advanced CRC Biochemical Response Evaluation on Lymphomas: Proposing a Scoring System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1