多投资组合选择与排序的综合过程

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Scientia Iranica Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.24200/sci.2023.61721.7456
Shadi Khalil Moghadam, Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, Mohammad Ali Rastegar
{"title":"多投资组合选择与排序的综合过程","authors":"Shadi Khalil Moghadam, Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, Mohammad Ali Rastegar","doi":"10.24200/sci.2023.61721.7456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portfolio optimization studies have traditionally assumed that portfolio managers manage only one portfolio. However, in reality, often manage multiple portfolios that can impact each other. This creates a need for fairness to all customers, which has led to the emergence of a new topic called \"multiportfolio optimization\". Previous studies have paid little attention to this issue, and the models used were not developed using real stock market data. These models were also limited to the selection phase and did not consider the ordering phase.This research provides a comprehensive process for addressing the multiportfolio problem, covering all sections from selection to ordering. It also implements the process using real stock market data. During this process, the market impact function is estimated using the I-STAR model for different stocks. The proposed model for market impact costs includes both permanent and temporary sections. The proposed models were tested using the Tehran Stock Exchange data in 2019.A comparison of the MPO model output with classical models indicates that the proposed model improves utility by an average of 15%. In the next phase, comparing the proposed ordering model with other models shows a reduction in market impact costs by an average of 26%.","PeriodicalId":21605,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Iranica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Process of Multiportfolio Selection and Ordering\",\"authors\":\"Shadi Khalil Moghadam, Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, Mohammad Ali Rastegar\",\"doi\":\"10.24200/sci.2023.61721.7456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Portfolio optimization studies have traditionally assumed that portfolio managers manage only one portfolio. However, in reality, often manage multiple portfolios that can impact each other. This creates a need for fairness to all customers, which has led to the emergence of a new topic called \\\"multiportfolio optimization\\\". Previous studies have paid little attention to this issue, and the models used were not developed using real stock market data. These models were also limited to the selection phase and did not consider the ordering phase.This research provides a comprehensive process for addressing the multiportfolio problem, covering all sections from selection to ordering. It also implements the process using real stock market data. During this process, the market impact function is estimated using the I-STAR model for different stocks. The proposed model for market impact costs includes both permanent and temporary sections. The proposed models were tested using the Tehran Stock Exchange data in 2019.A comparison of the MPO model output with classical models indicates that the proposed model improves utility by an average of 15%. In the next phase, comparing the proposed ordering model with other models shows a reduction in market impact costs by an average of 26%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Iranica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Iranica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2023.61721.7456\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Iranica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2023.61721.7456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

投资组合优化研究传统上假设投资组合经理只管理一个投资组合。然而,在现实中,我们经常管理多个相互影响的投资组合。这创造了对所有客户公平的需求,这导致了一个新主题的出现,称为“多投资组合优化”。以往的研究对这一问题关注较少,所用的模型也不是基于真实的股票市场数据建立的。这些模型也仅限于选择阶段,而没有考虑订购阶段。本研究为解决多投资组合问题提供了一个全面的过程,涵盖了从选择到排序的所有部分。它还使用真实的股票市场数据实现了这一过程。在此过程中,使用I-STAR模型对不同股票的市场影响函数进行估计。拟议的市场影响成本模型包括永久部分和临时部分。提出的模型在2019年使用德黑兰证券交易所的数据进行了测试。MPO模型输出与经典模型输出的比较表明,提出的模型平均提高了15%的效用。在下一阶段,将提出的订货模型与其他模型进行比较,发现市场影响成本平均降低了26%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive Process of Multiportfolio Selection and Ordering
Portfolio optimization studies have traditionally assumed that portfolio managers manage only one portfolio. However, in reality, often manage multiple portfolios that can impact each other. This creates a need for fairness to all customers, which has led to the emergence of a new topic called "multiportfolio optimization". Previous studies have paid little attention to this issue, and the models used were not developed using real stock market data. These models were also limited to the selection phase and did not consider the ordering phase.This research provides a comprehensive process for addressing the multiportfolio problem, covering all sections from selection to ordering. It also implements the process using real stock market data. During this process, the market impact function is estimated using the I-STAR model for different stocks. The proposed model for market impact costs includes both permanent and temporary sections. The proposed models were tested using the Tehran Stock Exchange data in 2019.A comparison of the MPO model output with classical models indicates that the proposed model improves utility by an average of 15%. In the next phase, comparing the proposed ordering model with other models shows a reduction in market impact costs by an average of 26%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Iranica
Scientia Iranica 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
59
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The objectives of Scientia Iranica are two-fold. The first is to provide a forum for the presentation of original works by scientists and engineers from around the world. The second is to open an effective channel to enhance the level of communication between scientists and engineers and the exchange of state-of-the-art research and ideas. The scope of the journal is broad and multidisciplinary in technical sciences and engineering. It encompasses theoretical and experimental research. Specific areas include but not limited to chemistry, chemical engineering, civil engineering, control and computer engineering, electrical engineering, material, manufacturing and industrial management, mathematics, mechanical engineering, nuclear engineering, petroleum engineering, physics, nanotechnology.
期刊最新文献
A New Approach to Estimating Destinations in Open Automated Fare Collection Systems based on errors-against-errors strategy Shared autonomous vehicle with pooled service, a modal shift approach Analysis of waves subjected to mechanical force and voids source in an initially stressed magneto-elastic medium with corrugated and impedance boundary Numerical study of slip and Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) in calendering process using non-Newtonian fluid An efficient biogas-base tri-generation of power, heating and cooling integrating inverted Brayton and ejector transcritical CO2 cycles: exergoeconomic evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1