超声引导胸骨旁肋间神经阻滞治疗胸骨切开术后疼痛?来自一项前瞻性观察研究的结果。

Antonio Toscano, Paolo Capuano, Chiara Perrucci, Matteo Giunta, Alberto Orsello, Tommaso Pierani, Andrea Costamagna, Mario Tedesco, Antonio Arcadipane, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Gabriella Buono, Luca Brazzi
{"title":"超声引导胸骨旁肋间神经阻滞治疗胸骨切开术后疼痛?来自一项前瞻性观察研究的结果。","authors":"Antonio Toscano, Paolo Capuano, Chiara Perrucci, Matteo Giunta, Alberto Orsello, Tommaso Pierani, Andrea Costamagna, Mario Tedesco, Antonio Arcadipane, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Gabriella Buono, Luca Brazzi","doi":"10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"3 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for post-sternotomy pain? Results from a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Toscano, Paolo Capuano, Chiara Perrucci, Matteo Giunta, Alberto Orsello, Tommaso Pierani, Andrea Costamagna, Mario Tedesco, Antonio Arcadipane, Giuseppe Sepolvere, Gabriella Buono, Luca Brazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652511/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-023-00134-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸骨旁肋间阻滞(PSB)已被提议用于胸骨正中切开术患者的术后镇痛。PSB可采用两种不同的入路,分别为浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(SPIP)和深胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(DPIP)。方法:我们设计了前瞻性、观察性队列研究,比较两种方法的镇痛效果。选取2022年1 - 9月行全胸骨切开术的心脏外科患者,根据疼痛控制策略分为吗啡组、SPIP组和DPIP组。主要结局是术后疼痛作为12小时NRS的绝对值进行评估。次要结局是24和48小时的NRS、补救性镇痛(包括阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药)的需要、术后恶心和呕吐的发生率、拔管时间、机械通气持续时间和肠功能障碍。结果:96例入组。在24小时和48小时的疼痛评定量表中位数方面,研究组之间没有显著差异。SPIP组、DPIP组和吗啡组术后吗啡总用量分别为1.00(0.00-3.00)、2.00(0.00-5.50)和15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) (SPIP组和DPIP组与吗啡组比较:p < 0.001)。SPIP组和DPIP组甲氧氯普胺用量低于吗啡组(p = 0.01)。在机械通气的持续时间和肠道活动方面,研究组之间没有差异。DPIP组发生2例气胸。结论:SPIP和DPIP似乎都能通过胸骨正中切开术保证心脏手术术后有效的疼痛管理,同时确保减少阿片类药物和止吐药物的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for post-sternotomy pain? Results from a prospective observational study.

Background: Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.

Methods: We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.

Results: Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.

Conclusions: Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe bronchiolitis before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective database analysis by the Italian Network of PICU study group (TIPNet). Understanding neuropathic pain: the role of neurophysiological tests in unveiling underlying mechanisms. Erector spinae plane block for cancer pain relief: a systematic review. Echocardiographic evaluation in patient candidate for liver transplant: from pathophysiology to hemodynamic optimization. Management of critically ill patients in austere environments: good clinical practice by the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1