阶梯式护理治疗伴ⅰ型和ⅱ型改变的慢性椎间盘源性腰痛的疗效观察

Heidi Mylenbusch, Michiel Schepers, Elmar Kleinjan, Marije Pol, Henk Tempelman, Hanneke Klopper-Kes
{"title":"阶梯式护理治疗伴ⅰ型和ⅱ型改变的慢性椎间盘源性腰痛的疗效观察","authors":"Heidi Mylenbusch,&nbsp;Michiel Schepers,&nbsp;Elmar Kleinjan,&nbsp;Marije Pol,&nbsp;Henk Tempelman,&nbsp;Hanneke Klopper-Kes","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated whether patients with Modic changes (MC) of types I, I/II, and II would respond to an anti-inflammatory-based, stepped care treatment with three treatment steps: first, oral administration of NSAIDs, 2 × 200 mg celecoxib daily for two weeks; second, an intradiscal steroid injection (ID) with dexamethasone and cefazolin; and third, oral treatment with antibiotics (AB), 3 × 1 g amoxicillin daily for 100 days.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was an observational clinical study based on analyses of categorical data of patient-reported outcome measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Subjects were consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), diagnosed by assessment of anamnestic signs of inflammation; a pain score ≥6 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); a mechanical assessment; MC I, I/II, or II based on MRI; and lack of response to conservative treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, 833 eligible patients were selected for the stepped care treatment. A total of 332 patients completed requested follow-up questionnaires at baseline and 12 months (optional at 3 and 6 months). Primary outcomes were pain (at least 50 % pain relief) and/or a minimum of 40 % improvement in functionality as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were use of pain medication and return to work.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 1 year of follow-up, 179 (53.6 %) of 332 patients reported improvement according to the responder criteria. Of the 138 patients that had received only NSAIDs, 88 (63.8 %) had improved. In addition, 50 (56.8 %) of the 183 patients that had received ID had improved, and 41 (38.7 %) of the 106 patients treated with AB had improved. None of the patients reported complications. 12.0 % of patients using AB stopped preterm due to undesirable side effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Treatment with a stepped care model for inflammatory pain produced clinically relevant, positive reported outcomes on pain and/or function. Our stepped care model appears to be a useful, safe, and cost-saving treatment option that is easily reproducible. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials and analyses of subgroups, may help to develop a more patient-tailored approach and further avoidance of less-effective treatments and costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423001243/pdfft?md5=03ddcbb9652007728127cb66cadf5ed3&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594423001243-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of stepped care treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain patients with Modic I and II changes\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Mylenbusch,&nbsp;Michiel Schepers,&nbsp;Elmar Kleinjan,&nbsp;Marije Pol,&nbsp;Henk Tempelman,&nbsp;Hanneke Klopper-Kes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study investigated whether patients with Modic changes (MC) of types I, I/II, and II would respond to an anti-inflammatory-based, stepped care treatment with three treatment steps: first, oral administration of NSAIDs, 2 × 200 mg celecoxib daily for two weeks; second, an intradiscal steroid injection (ID) with dexamethasone and cefazolin; and third, oral treatment with antibiotics (AB), 3 × 1 g amoxicillin daily for 100 days.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was an observational clinical study based on analyses of categorical data of patient-reported outcome measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Subjects were consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), diagnosed by assessment of anamnestic signs of inflammation; a pain score ≥6 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); a mechanical assessment; MC I, I/II, or II based on MRI; and lack of response to conservative treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, 833 eligible patients were selected for the stepped care treatment. A total of 332 patients completed requested follow-up questionnaires at baseline and 12 months (optional at 3 and 6 months). Primary outcomes were pain (at least 50 % pain relief) and/or a minimum of 40 % improvement in functionality as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were use of pain medication and return to work.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 1 year of follow-up, 179 (53.6 %) of 332 patients reported improvement according to the responder criteria. Of the 138 patients that had received only NSAIDs, 88 (63.8 %) had improved. In addition, 50 (56.8 %) of the 183 patients that had received ID had improved, and 41 (38.7 %) of the 106 patients treated with AB had improved. None of the patients reported complications. 12.0 % of patients using AB stopped preterm due to undesirable side effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Treatment with a stepped care model for inflammatory pain produced clinically relevant, positive reported outcomes on pain and/or function. Our stepped care model appears to be a useful, safe, and cost-saving treatment option that is easily reproducible. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials and analyses of subgroups, may help to develop a more patient-tailored approach and further avoidance of less-effective treatments and costs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423001243/pdfft?md5=03ddcbb9652007728127cb66cadf5ed3&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594423001243-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423001243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423001243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨I型、I/II型和II型MC患者是否对以抗炎为基础的三步治疗有反应:首先,口服非甾体抗炎药,每天2 × 200 mg塞来昔布,持续两周;第二,椎间盘内类固醇注射(ID)与地塞米松和头孢唑林;三是口服抗生素(AB),每日阿莫西林3 × 1 g,连用100天。这是一项观察性临床研究,基于对患者报告的结果测量的分类数据的分析。受试者为连续的慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者,通过评估炎症的记忆体征来诊断;数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS)疼痛评分≥6分;机械评估;基于MRI的MC I、I/II或II;并且对保守治疗缺乏反应。方法2015年1月1日至2021年12月31日,选取符合条件的833例患者进行分步护理治疗。共有332名患者在基线和12个月(可选择在3个月和6个月)完成了要求的随访问卷。通过罗兰莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)或奥斯维斯特残疾问卷(ODI)测量,主要结局是疼痛(至少缓解50%疼痛)和/或功能改善至少40%。次要结局指标是止痛药的使用和重返工作岗位。结果随访1年,332例患者中,179例(53.6%)患者根据应答标准报告改善。138例仅接受非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者中,88例(63.8%)好转。此外,183例接受ID治疗的患者中有50例(56.8%)改善,106例接受AB治疗的患者中有41例(38.7%)改善。所有患者均未出现并发症。12.0%的患者使用AB停止早产,因为不良的副作用。结论采用阶梯式护理模式治疗炎症性疼痛产生了临床相关的、积极的疼痛和/或功能预后报告。我们的阶梯式护理模式似乎是一种有用、安全、节省成本的治疗选择,易于复制。进一步的研究,包括随机对照试验和亚组分析,可能有助于开发更适合患者的方法,并进一步避免效果较差的治疗方法和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of stepped care treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain patients with Modic I and II changes

Objective

This study investigated whether patients with Modic changes (MC) of types I, I/II, and II would respond to an anti-inflammatory-based, stepped care treatment with three treatment steps: first, oral administration of NSAIDs, 2 × 200 mg celecoxib daily for two weeks; second, an intradiscal steroid injection (ID) with dexamethasone and cefazolin; and third, oral treatment with antibiotics (AB), 3 × 1 g amoxicillin daily for 100 days.

Design

This was an observational clinical study based on analyses of categorical data of patient-reported outcome measurements.

Subjects

Subjects were consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), diagnosed by assessment of anamnestic signs of inflammation; a pain score ≥6 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); a mechanical assessment; MC I, I/II, or II based on MRI; and lack of response to conservative treatment.

Methods

From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, 833 eligible patients were selected for the stepped care treatment. A total of 332 patients completed requested follow-up questionnaires at baseline and 12 months (optional at 3 and 6 months). Primary outcomes were pain (at least 50 % pain relief) and/or a minimum of 40 % improvement in functionality as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were use of pain medication and return to work.

Results

At 1 year of follow-up, 179 (53.6 %) of 332 patients reported improvement according to the responder criteria. Of the 138 patients that had received only NSAIDs, 88 (63.8 %) had improved. In addition, 50 (56.8 %) of the 183 patients that had received ID had improved, and 41 (38.7 %) of the 106 patients treated with AB had improved. None of the patients reported complications. 12.0 % of patients using AB stopped preterm due to undesirable side effects.

Conclusion

Treatment with a stepped care model for inflammatory pain produced clinically relevant, positive reported outcomes on pain and/or function. Our stepped care model appears to be a useful, safe, and cost-saving treatment option that is easily reproducible. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials and analyses of subgroups, may help to develop a more patient-tailored approach and further avoidance of less-effective treatments and costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reddit users' perspectives on radiofrequency ablation: A data analysis. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1