单切口改良经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁中期临床疗效及安全性

Jerome Melon , Päivi K. Karjalainen , Claire McGannon , Joseph K. Lee , Anna Rosamilia
{"title":"单切口改良经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁中期临床疗效及安全性","authors":"Jerome Melon ,&nbsp;Päivi K. Karjalainen ,&nbsp;Claire McGannon ,&nbsp;Joseph K. Lee ,&nbsp;Anna Rosamilia","doi":"10.1016/j.gocm.2022.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To evaluate the medium term efficacy and safety of Altis and Solyx single incision slings (SIS) compared with tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) Abbrevo trans-obturator sling. We hypothesize that both SIS show little difference in efficacy and safety and perform similarly to TVT Abbrevo.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an ambispective comparative cohort study of women with stress urinary incontinence who received a SIS in comparison to matched TVT Abbrevo subjects from a concurrent randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subjects were identified retrospectively, and prospectively invited for examination and questionnaires&gt;12 months post-operatively. Exclusions included intrinsic sphincter deficiency, previous sling surgery, and others. Primary outcome was subjective cure [negative response to International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) question 6, leakage during coughing/activity]. Secondary outcomes include objective cure (negative cough stress test), functional outcomes, and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2012 and 2018, a total of 113 women received one of two SIS surgeries; Solyx (n ​= ​50) followed by the Altis (n ​= ​63); 104 were available for final efficacy analysis. Mean follow-up was 21.7 (Altis), 46.0 (Solyx), and 29.0 (Abbrevo) months. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. There was no significant differences in the subjective or objective cure rates between the groups, and no differences in functional outcomes such as patient global impression of improvement, and post-operative ICIQ-UI SF score. There was a low rate of mesh related complications and no differences seen between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite being an underpowered study, Altis and Solyx SIS have favourable efficacy and safety profiles which are comparable to an established trans-obturator mid-urethral slings (MUS).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34826,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164622000276/pdfft?md5=d2b41dedca49b9a57be2ecaee2a27735&pid=1-s2.0-S2667164622000276-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medium-term clinical efficacy and safety of single incision and modified trans-obturator mid-urethral slings for female stress urinary incontinence\",\"authors\":\"Jerome Melon ,&nbsp;Päivi K. Karjalainen ,&nbsp;Claire McGannon ,&nbsp;Joseph K. Lee ,&nbsp;Anna Rosamilia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gocm.2022.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To evaluate the medium term efficacy and safety of Altis and Solyx single incision slings (SIS) compared with tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) Abbrevo trans-obturator sling. We hypothesize that both SIS show little difference in efficacy and safety and perform similarly to TVT Abbrevo.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted an ambispective comparative cohort study of women with stress urinary incontinence who received a SIS in comparison to matched TVT Abbrevo subjects from a concurrent randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subjects were identified retrospectively, and prospectively invited for examination and questionnaires&gt;12 months post-operatively. Exclusions included intrinsic sphincter deficiency, previous sling surgery, and others. Primary outcome was subjective cure [negative response to International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) question 6, leakage during coughing/activity]. Secondary outcomes include objective cure (negative cough stress test), functional outcomes, and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2012 and 2018, a total of 113 women received one of two SIS surgeries; Solyx (n ​= ​50) followed by the Altis (n ​= ​63); 104 were available for final efficacy analysis. Mean follow-up was 21.7 (Altis), 46.0 (Solyx), and 29.0 (Abbrevo) months. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. There was no significant differences in the subjective or objective cure rates between the groups, and no differences in functional outcomes such as patient global impression of improvement, and post-operative ICIQ-UI SF score. There was a low rate of mesh related complications and no differences seen between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite being an underpowered study, Altis and Solyx SIS have favourable efficacy and safety profiles which are comparable to an established trans-obturator mid-urethral slings (MUS).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164622000276/pdfft?md5=d2b41dedca49b9a57be2ecaee2a27735&pid=1-s2.0-S2667164622000276-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164622000276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164622000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较Altis和Solyx单切口吊带(SIS)与无张力阴道带(TVT) Abbrevo经闭孔吊带的中期疗效和安全性。我们假设两种SIS在疗效和安全性上几乎没有差异,并且与TVT Abbrevo的表现相似。方法:我们对接受SIS治疗的女性压力性尿失禁患者进行了一项双视角比较队列研究,并与同期随机对照试验(RCT)中匹配的TVT Abbrevo患者进行了比较。回顾性确定受试者,并在术后12个月进行前瞻性检查和问卷调查。排除包括固有括约肌缺陷,既往吊带手术等。主要结局是主观治愈[对国际咨询失禁问卷-尿失禁简表(ICIQ-UI SF)第6题的负面反应,咳嗽/活动时渗漏]。次要结局包括客观治愈(咳嗽压力试验阴性)、功能结局和不良事件。结果2012年至2018年,共有113名女性接受了两次SIS手术中的一次;Solyx (n = 50)其次是Altis (n = 63);104例用于最终疗效分析。平均随访时间分别为21.7个月(Altis)、46.0个月(Solyx)和29.0个月(Abbrevo)。两组间基线特征具有可比性。两组之间的主观或客观治愈率无显著差异,功能结果如患者总体改善印象和术后ICIQ-UI SF评分无显著差异。补片相关并发症发生率低,两组间无差异。结论:尽管这是一项缺乏动力的研究,Altis和Solyx SIS具有良好的疗效和安全性,可与已建立的经闭孔中尿道吊索(MUS)相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medium-term clinical efficacy and safety of single incision and modified trans-obturator mid-urethral slings for female stress urinary incontinence

Aims

To evaluate the medium term efficacy and safety of Altis and Solyx single incision slings (SIS) compared with tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) Abbrevo trans-obturator sling. We hypothesize that both SIS show little difference in efficacy and safety and perform similarly to TVT Abbrevo.

Methods

We conducted an ambispective comparative cohort study of women with stress urinary incontinence who received a SIS in comparison to matched TVT Abbrevo subjects from a concurrent randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subjects were identified retrospectively, and prospectively invited for examination and questionnaires>12 months post-operatively. Exclusions included intrinsic sphincter deficiency, previous sling surgery, and others. Primary outcome was subjective cure [negative response to International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) question 6, leakage during coughing/activity]. Secondary outcomes include objective cure (negative cough stress test), functional outcomes, and adverse events.

Results

Between 2012 and 2018, a total of 113 women received one of two SIS surgeries; Solyx (n ​= ​50) followed by the Altis (n ​= ​63); 104 were available for final efficacy analysis. Mean follow-up was 21.7 (Altis), 46.0 (Solyx), and 29.0 (Abbrevo) months. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. There was no significant differences in the subjective or objective cure rates between the groups, and no differences in functional outcomes such as patient global impression of improvement, and post-operative ICIQ-UI SF score. There was a low rate of mesh related complications and no differences seen between the groups.

Conclusions

Despite being an underpowered study, Altis and Solyx SIS have favourable efficacy and safety profiles which are comparable to an established trans-obturator mid-urethral slings (MUS).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of physical activity status and food patterns in adolescents with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: an analytical approach Chemotherapy response assessment using ultrasound in ovarian cancer Minimally invasive methods with no fibroid surgical removal to treat uterine fibroids: utility or advertising? Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection an add-on to conventional in vitro fertilisation for infertility without severe male factors? Relationship between the change of ATP level controlled by ectonucleotidases and endometriosis-associated infertility and pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1