西班牙语语音量表的验证:心理测量特性的系统回顾

Antonio Velandrino Nicolás , Francisco Cabello Luque , María Parra Villazala , Elena Nieto Garrido , María José Sánchez Roca , Judit Álvarez-Gómez
{"title":"西班牙语语音量表的验证:心理测量特性的系统回顾","authors":"Antonio Velandrino Nicolás ,&nbsp;Francisco Cabello Luque ,&nbsp;María Parra Villazala ,&nbsp;Elena Nieto Garrido ,&nbsp;María José Sánchez Roca ,&nbsp;Judit Álvarez-Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.rlfa.2023.100330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>To use a test in a language or culture other than the original it is necessary to carry out, in addition to its adaptation, a psychometric validation. This </span>systematic review assesses the validation studies of the voice self-report scales in Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed searching ten databases. The assessment was carried out following the criteria proposed by Terwee et al. (2007) together with some specifically proposed for this study. Validation studies in Spanish of self-report voice scales published in indexed journals were included and the search was updated on February 2nd, 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>15 studies that evaluated 12 scales were reviewed. It was verified that not all the validations were adjusted to the criteria used and that the properties to verify the metric strength of the validations were, in general, few.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This systematic review shows that the included studies do not report much evidence of metric quality. It should be considered that different strategies have currently been developed to obtain more and better evidence of reliability and validity. Our contribution is to reflect on the usual practice of validation of self-report scales in Spanish language. The most important weakness is the possibility of using broader and more current evaluation protocols. We also propose to continue this work, completing it with a meta-analytic study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56174,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of voice scales into Spanish: Systematic review of the psychometric properties\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Velandrino Nicolás ,&nbsp;Francisco Cabello Luque ,&nbsp;María Parra Villazala ,&nbsp;Elena Nieto Garrido ,&nbsp;María José Sánchez Roca ,&nbsp;Judit Álvarez-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rlfa.2023.100330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>To use a test in a language or culture other than the original it is necessary to carry out, in addition to its adaptation, a psychometric validation. This </span>systematic review assesses the validation studies of the voice self-report scales in Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed searching ten databases. The assessment was carried out following the criteria proposed by Terwee et al. (2007) together with some specifically proposed for this study. Validation studies in Spanish of self-report voice scales published in indexed journals were included and the search was updated on February 2nd, 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>15 studies that evaluated 12 scales were reviewed. It was verified that not all the validations were adjusted to the criteria used and that the properties to verify the metric strength of the validations were, in general, few.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This systematic review shows that the included studies do not report much evidence of metric quality. It should be considered that different strategies have currently been developed to obtain more and better evidence of reliability and validity. Our contribution is to reflect on the usual practice of validation of self-report scales in Spanish language. The most important weakness is the possibility of using broader and more current evaluation protocols. We also propose to continue this work, completing it with a meta-analytic study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214460323000323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214460323000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要在非原语言或文化中使用测试,除了对其进行适应外,还必须进行心理测量验证。本系统综述评估了西班牙语语音自我报告量表的有效性研究。方法对10个数据库进行系统评价。评估是按照Terwee等人(2007)提出的标准以及为本研究特别提出的一些标准进行的。纳入已发表在索引期刊上的西班牙语自我报告语音量表的验证研究,并于2023年2月2日更新检索。结果回顾了评估12种量表的15项研究。经过验证,并非所有的验证都被调整为所使用的标准,并且用于验证验证的度量强度的属性通常很少。结论:本系统综述显示,纳入的研究没有报告多少度量质量的证据。应该考虑到,目前已经制定了不同的策略来获得更多和更好的信度和效度证据。我们的贡献是反思西班牙语自我报告量表验证的通常做法。最重要的缺点是可能使用更广泛和更流行的评估协议。我们还建议继续这项工作,并通过荟萃分析研究来完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of voice scales into Spanish: Systematic review of the psychometric properties

Introduction

To use a test in a language or culture other than the original it is necessary to carry out, in addition to its adaptation, a psychometric validation. This systematic review assesses the validation studies of the voice self-report scales in Spanish.

Methods

A systematic review was performed searching ten databases. The assessment was carried out following the criteria proposed by Terwee et al. (2007) together with some specifically proposed for this study. Validation studies in Spanish of self-report voice scales published in indexed journals were included and the search was updated on February 2nd, 2023.

Results

15 studies that evaluated 12 scales were reviewed. It was verified that not all the validations were adjusted to the criteria used and that the properties to verify the metric strength of the validations were, in general, few.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows that the included studies do not report much evidence of metric quality. It should be considered that different strategies have currently been developed to obtain more and better evidence of reliability and validity. Our contribution is to reflect on the usual practice of validation of self-report scales in Spanish language. The most important weakness is the possibility of using broader and more current evaluation protocols. We also propose to continue this work, completing it with a meta-analytic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Estilos de afrontamiento de padres de niños con fisura labio-alveolo-palatina en los Andes Centrales del Ecuador (Cuenca-Ambato) Dos medidas de producción fonológica para la identificación de comorbilidad en los trastornos de los sonidos del habla en niños mexicanos Marc Monfort o la centralidad psicológica del lenguaje en la Logopedia (y viceversa) M. Monfort: hacer y enseñar logopedia Reading comprehension skills in children with language development disorder—Systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1