自定义构建移植数据集多维医学组合植入应用程序

Nikolaus Börner , Markus B. Schoenberg , Philipp Pöschke , Benedikt Pöllmann , Dominik Koch , Moritz Drefs , Dionysios Koliogiannis , Christian Böhm , Jens Werner , Markus Guba
{"title":"自定义构建移植数据集多维医学组合植入应用程序","authors":"Nikolaus Börner ,&nbsp;Markus B. Schoenberg ,&nbsp;Philipp Pöschke ,&nbsp;Benedikt Pöllmann ,&nbsp;Dominik Koch ,&nbsp;Moritz Drefs ,&nbsp;Dionysios Koliogiannis ,&nbsp;Christian Böhm ,&nbsp;Jens Werner ,&nbsp;Markus Guba","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>Data science methods have grown to solve complex medical problems. Data records utilized are often incomplete. Within this study we developed and validated a novel multidimensional medical combined imputation (MMCI) application to analyse multifaceted and segmented datasets as found in liver transplantation registries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The multidimensional medical combined imputation (MMCI) application is a pipeline of interconnected methods to impute segmented clinical data with the highest accuracy. Two different complete datasets were used in the testing procedure. A transplantation dataset (TxData) and a multivariate Wisconsin breast cancer (diagnostic) dataset (BcData). For both datasets, the most common imputation methods were tested, and their accuracy (ACC) compared to the novel MMCI (RF and LR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the TxData the MMCI RF and MMCI LR outperformed the other imputation algorithms regarding ACC. In the BcData the overall performance was good. The MMCI LR was the most superior algorithm for up to 10% of missing values with ACC = 91.9 (at 5% missing) to 90.6 (at 10% missing). The MMCI RF was the most accurate from 89.9 at 20% missing to 89.4 at 30% missing. All other established imputation algorithm showed inferior ACC, with MF and MICE showing results close to ACC of 90.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study presents the MMCI as a novel imputation pipeline to handle segmented and multifaceted clinical data. The MMCI proved to be more accurate than the established imputation methods when analysing 5–30% missing data. This study warrants future studies to investigate the value of the MMCI in predicting missing values in different datasets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990022000349/pdfft?md5=9184a7b6aa5850fbe81112a98d542518&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990022000349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A custom build multidimensional medical combined imputation application for a transplantation dataset\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus Börner ,&nbsp;Markus B. Schoenberg ,&nbsp;Philipp Pöschke ,&nbsp;Benedikt Pöllmann ,&nbsp;Dominik Koch ,&nbsp;Moritz Drefs ,&nbsp;Dionysios Koliogiannis ,&nbsp;Christian Böhm ,&nbsp;Jens Werner ,&nbsp;Markus Guba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>Data science methods have grown to solve complex medical problems. Data records utilized are often incomplete. Within this study we developed and validated a novel multidimensional medical combined imputation (MMCI) application to analyse multifaceted and segmented datasets as found in liver transplantation registries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The multidimensional medical combined imputation (MMCI) application is a pipeline of interconnected methods to impute segmented clinical data with the highest accuracy. Two different complete datasets were used in the testing procedure. A transplantation dataset (TxData) and a multivariate Wisconsin breast cancer (diagnostic) dataset (BcData). For both datasets, the most common imputation methods were tested, and their accuracy (ACC) compared to the novel MMCI (RF and LR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the TxData the MMCI RF and MMCI LR outperformed the other imputation algorithms regarding ACC. In the BcData the overall performance was good. The MMCI LR was the most superior algorithm for up to 10% of missing values with ACC = 91.9 (at 5% missing) to 90.6 (at 10% missing). The MMCI RF was the most accurate from 89.9 at 20% missing to 89.4 at 30% missing. All other established imputation algorithm showed inferior ACC, with MF and MICE showing results close to ACC of 90.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study presents the MMCI as a novel imputation pipeline to handle segmented and multifaceted clinical data. The MMCI proved to be more accurate than the established imputation methods when analysing 5–30% missing data. This study warrants future studies to investigate the value of the MMCI in predicting missing values in different datasets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990022000349/pdfft?md5=9184a7b6aa5850fbe81112a98d542518&pid=1-s2.0-S2666990022000349-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990022000349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990022000349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的数据科学方法已经发展到可以解决复杂的医学问题。所使用的数据记录往往是不完整的。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了一种新的多维医学组合植入(MMCI)应用程序,用于分析肝移植登记中发现的多方面和分段数据集。方法多维医学组合数据输入(MMCI)是一种由多个相互关联的方法组成的流水线,可对分割后的临床数据进行最高准确率的数据输入。在测试过程中使用了两个不同的完整数据集。移植数据集(TxData)和多变量威斯康星乳腺癌(诊断)数据集(BcData)。对于这两个数据集,测试了最常见的插入方法,并将其准确度(ACC)与新型MMCI (RF和LR)相比。结果在TxData中,MMCI RF和MMCI LR在ACC方面优于其他算法。在BcData中,总体性能良好。在高达10%的缺失值上,MMCI LR是最优算法,其ACC = 91.9(缺失5%)至90.6(缺失10%)。MMCI RF是最准确的,从89.9的20%缺失到89.4的30%缺失。其他建立的算法ACC均较差,其中MF和MICE的ACC接近90。结论本研究提出MMCI作为一种新的输入管道来处理分段和多方面的临床数据。在分析5-30%的缺失数据时,MMCI比现有的估算方法更准确。这项研究保证了未来研究MMCI在预测不同数据集缺失值方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A custom build multidimensional medical combined imputation application for a transplantation dataset

Background and Objectives

Data science methods have grown to solve complex medical problems. Data records utilized are often incomplete. Within this study we developed and validated a novel multidimensional medical combined imputation (MMCI) application to analyse multifaceted and segmented datasets as found in liver transplantation registries.

Methods

The multidimensional medical combined imputation (MMCI) application is a pipeline of interconnected methods to impute segmented clinical data with the highest accuracy. Two different complete datasets were used in the testing procedure. A transplantation dataset (TxData) and a multivariate Wisconsin breast cancer (diagnostic) dataset (BcData). For both datasets, the most common imputation methods were tested, and their accuracy (ACC) compared to the novel MMCI (RF and LR).

Results

In the TxData the MMCI RF and MMCI LR outperformed the other imputation algorithms regarding ACC. In the BcData the overall performance was good. The MMCI LR was the most superior algorithm for up to 10% of missing values with ACC = 91.9 (at 5% missing) to 90.6 (at 10% missing). The MMCI RF was the most accurate from 89.9 at 20% missing to 89.4 at 30% missing. All other established imputation algorithm showed inferior ACC, with MF and MICE showing results close to ACC of 90.

Conclusion

This study presents the MMCI as a novel imputation pipeline to handle segmented and multifaceted clinical data. The MMCI proved to be more accurate than the established imputation methods when analysing 5–30% missing data. This study warrants future studies to investigate the value of the MMCI in predicting missing values in different datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes Machine learning from real data: A mental health registry case study ResfEANet: ResNet-fused External Attention Network for Tuberculosis Diagnosis using Chest X-ray Images Role-playing recovery in social virtual worlds: Adult use of child avatars as PTSD therapy Comparative evaluation of low-cost 3D scanning devices for ear acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1