碘丙胺剂量与尿路图像质量:是否有最佳剂量?

R Dominik, R Keysser, V Taenzer
{"title":"碘丙胺剂量与尿路图像质量:是否有最佳剂量?","authors":"R Dominik,&nbsp;R Keysser,&nbsp;V Taenzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influence of increasing doses of contrast medium (CM; 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 ml iopromide/kg body weight; 300 mg I/ml) was examined in a randomized, double-blind study. An increase of the dosage resulted in a statistically significant improvement of the quality of the radiographic visualization. This was most pronounced with an increase from 0.75 to 1.0 ml/kg body weight and least pronounced with the increase from 1.5 to 2.0 ml/kg body weight. This improvement was not only visible in the overall quality, but in each part of the urinary tract, the calyces, the pelves, the ureters, and most especially at the parenchyma. Due to economic considerations at the present, a dose of 1.0 ml/kg (300 mg I/ml) is viewed as adequate. Doses below this level should be avoided due to the poorer image quality that results. From a purely medical point of view, the injection of 1.5 ml of nonionic CM/kg body weight is considered optimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":75861,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband","volume":"128 ","pages":"111-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iopromide dosage and urographic image quality: is there an optimal dose?\",\"authors\":\"R Dominik,&nbsp;R Keysser,&nbsp;V Taenzer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The influence of increasing doses of contrast medium (CM; 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 ml iopromide/kg body weight; 300 mg I/ml) was examined in a randomized, double-blind study. An increase of the dosage resulted in a statistically significant improvement of the quality of the radiographic visualization. This was most pronounced with an increase from 0.75 to 1.0 ml/kg body weight and least pronounced with the increase from 1.5 to 2.0 ml/kg body weight. This improvement was not only visible in the overall quality, but in each part of the urinary tract, the calyces, the pelves, the ureters, and most especially at the parenchyma. Due to economic considerations at the present, a dose of 1.0 ml/kg (300 mg I/ml) is viewed as adequate. Doses below this level should be avoided due to the poorer image quality that results. From a purely medical point of view, the injection of 1.5 ml of nonionic CM/kg body weight is considered optimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"111-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增加造影剂剂量(CM;0.75、1.0、1.5和2.0 ml碘丙胺/kg体重;在一项随机双盲研究中检查了300 mg I/ml)。剂量的增加导致放射影像质量的统计学显著改善。从0.75 ml/kg体重增加到1.0 ml/kg体重时,这一点最明显,从1.5 ml/kg体重增加到2.0 ml/kg体重时,这一点最不明显。这种改善不仅在整体质量上是可见的,而且在泌尿道的每个部分,肾盏,肾盂,输尿管,尤其是在实质。由于目前的经济考虑,1.0 ml/kg (300 mg /ml)的剂量被认为是足够的。由于图像质量较差,应避免低于此水平的剂量。从纯粹的医学角度来看,注射1.5 ml的非离子CM/kg体重被认为是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Iopromide dosage and urographic image quality: is there an optimal dose?

The influence of increasing doses of contrast medium (CM; 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 ml iopromide/kg body weight; 300 mg I/ml) was examined in a randomized, double-blind study. An increase of the dosage resulted in a statistically significant improvement of the quality of the radiographic visualization. This was most pronounced with an increase from 0.75 to 1.0 ml/kg body weight and least pronounced with the increase from 1.5 to 2.0 ml/kg body weight. This improvement was not only visible in the overall quality, but in each part of the urinary tract, the calyces, the pelves, the ureters, and most especially at the parenchyma. Due to economic considerations at the present, a dose of 1.0 ml/kg (300 mg I/ml) is viewed as adequate. Doses below this level should be avoided due to the poorer image quality that results. From a purely medical point of view, the injection of 1.5 ml of nonionic CM/kg body weight is considered optimal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent developments in nonionic contrast media. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate. Plasma level and renal excretion of iotrolan after lumbar injection in patients. Left ventricular after load as a result of levocardiography with contrast media of various osmolality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1