{"title":"中文版Kid-KINDLR问卷测量学龄儿童健康相关生活质量的心理测量特性","authors":"Phoebe L.C. Chan, Serena S.W. Ng, Dora Y.L. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2014.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> questionnaire were examined with school-aged children in Hong Kong.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 112 healthy children were selected by convenience sampling from two primary schools and 30 children with global developmental delay were selected from an outpatient occupational therapy department of a convalescent hospital. The Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> questionnaire was translated using independent forward and backward translation. The content validity of the translated instrument was evaluated by four experts. Internal consistency, factor analysis, and construct validity were examined in the healthy children group, whereas known-group comparison was performed in the group with global developmental delay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The significance value of the Shapiro–Wilk test was greater than 0.05, indicating that the sample displayed a normal distribution. The total score had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .77); however, the consistency of the subscales varied (Cronbach's alpha ranged from .47 to .70). The children and parent questionnaires did not load onto the six factors originally hypothesized. Instead, seven factors were generated. Evidence supporting the questionnaire's validity included a lack of age and sex bias and positive known-group differentiation (Wilks' lambda = 0.906, <em>p</em> = .035).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Chinese version of the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> questionnaire exhibited good psychometric properties, but the internal consistency of the translated instrument needs further improvement. It is recommended that practitioners focus on the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> total score when interpreting the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> data. Overall, the study findings indicate that the Chinese version of the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> is an important tool for use in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2014.05.001","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Kid-KINDLR Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-related Quality of Life of School-aged Children\",\"authors\":\"Phoebe L.C. Chan, Serena S.W. Ng, Dora Y.L. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hkjot.2014.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> questionnaire were examined with school-aged children in Hong Kong.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 112 healthy children were selected by convenience sampling from two primary schools and 30 children with global developmental delay were selected from an outpatient occupational therapy department of a convalescent hospital. The Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> questionnaire was translated using independent forward and backward translation. The content validity of the translated instrument was evaluated by four experts. Internal consistency, factor analysis, and construct validity were examined in the healthy children group, whereas known-group comparison was performed in the group with global developmental delay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The significance value of the Shapiro–Wilk test was greater than 0.05, indicating that the sample displayed a normal distribution. The total score had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .77); however, the consistency of the subscales varied (Cronbach's alpha ranged from .47 to .70). The children and parent questionnaires did not load onto the six factors originally hypothesized. Instead, seven factors were generated. Evidence supporting the questionnaire's validity included a lack of age and sex bias and positive known-group differentiation (Wilks' lambda = 0.906, <em>p</em> = .035).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Chinese version of the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> questionnaire exhibited good psychometric properties, but the internal consistency of the translated instrument needs further improvement. It is recommended that practitioners focus on the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> total score when interpreting the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> data. Overall, the study findings indicate that the Chinese version of the Kid-KINDL<sup>R</sup> is an important tool for use in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2014.05.001\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186114000175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186114000175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
目的/背景本研究以香港学龄儿童为研究对象,对中文版Kid-KINDLR问卷的信度和效度进行检验。方法采用方便抽样法抽取两所小学健康儿童112名和某康复医院门诊职业治疗科整体发育迟缓儿童30名。Kid-KINDLR问卷采用独立正向和反向翻译。翻译工具的内容效度由4位专家进行评估。在健康儿童组进行内部一致性、因子分析和结构效度检验,而在整体发育迟缓组进行已知组比较。结果夏皮罗-威尔克检验的显著性值大于0.05,表明样本呈正态分布。总分具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = .77);然而,亚量表的一致性各不相同(Cronbach's alpha在0.47到0.70之间)。孩子和家长的调查问卷并没有体现最初假设的六个因素。相反,产生了七个因素。支持问卷效度的证据包括缺乏年龄和性别偏见以及积极的已知组分化(Wilks’lambda = 0.906, p = 0.035)。结论中文版Kid-KINDLR问卷具有较好的心理测量特性,但翻译后的问卷内部一致性有待进一步提高。建议从业者在解释Kid-KINDLR数据时关注Kid-KINDLR总分。总的来说,研究结果表明中文版的Kid-KINDLR在临床实践中是一个重要的工具。
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Kid-KINDLR Questionnaire for Measuring the Health-related Quality of Life of School-aged Children
Objective/Background
The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Kid-KINDLR questionnaire were examined with school-aged children in Hong Kong.
Methods
A total of 112 healthy children were selected by convenience sampling from two primary schools and 30 children with global developmental delay were selected from an outpatient occupational therapy department of a convalescent hospital. The Kid-KINDLR questionnaire was translated using independent forward and backward translation. The content validity of the translated instrument was evaluated by four experts. Internal consistency, factor analysis, and construct validity were examined in the healthy children group, whereas known-group comparison was performed in the group with global developmental delay.
Results
The significance value of the Shapiro–Wilk test was greater than 0.05, indicating that the sample displayed a normal distribution. The total score had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .77); however, the consistency of the subscales varied (Cronbach's alpha ranged from .47 to .70). The children and parent questionnaires did not load onto the six factors originally hypothesized. Instead, seven factors were generated. Evidence supporting the questionnaire's validity included a lack of age and sex bias and positive known-group differentiation (Wilks' lambda = 0.906, p = .035).
Conclusion
The Chinese version of the Kid-KINDLR questionnaire exhibited good psychometric properties, but the internal consistency of the translated instrument needs further improvement. It is recommended that practitioners focus on the Kid-KINDLR total score when interpreting the Kid-KINDLR data. Overall, the study findings indicate that the Chinese version of the Kid-KINDLR is an important tool for use in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.