设定养老金计划资产的预期收益率:审计委员会会计专家影响的新证据

Joseph Comprix , Jun Guo , Yan Zhang , Nan Zhou
{"title":"设定养老金计划资产的预期收益率:审计委员会会计专家影响的新证据","authors":"Joseph Comprix ,&nbsp;Jun Guo ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Nan Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines whether having accounting experts on audit committees can mitigate the upward bias of expected rates of return (ERR) on pension plan assets documented in prior research. ERRs are found to be lower in firms with accounting expertise on their audit committees. These results are robust after controlling for variables from extant governance and pension research, and they suggest that audit committee accounting experts can help deter managers from setting higher ERRs on pension assets. While extant studies find that opportunistic setting of pension assumptions can be controlled through regulation, this paper provides new evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts on critical pension estimates. This newfound governance effect is different from and incremental to the regulation effect previously documented in the pension accounting literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101074,"journal":{"name":"Research in Accounting Regulation","volume":"29 2","pages":"Pages 159-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting expected rates of return on pension plan assets: New evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Comprix ,&nbsp;Jun Guo ,&nbsp;Yan Zhang ,&nbsp;Nan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines whether having accounting experts on audit committees can mitigate the upward bias of expected rates of return (ERR) on pension plan assets documented in prior research. ERRs are found to be lower in firms with accounting expertise on their audit committees. These results are robust after controlling for variables from extant governance and pension research, and they suggest that audit committee accounting experts can help deter managers from setting higher ERRs on pension assets. While extant studies find that opportunistic setting of pension assumptions can be controlled through regulation, this paper provides new evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts on critical pension estimates. This newfound governance effect is different from and incremental to the regulation effect previously documented in the pension accounting literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 159-166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racreg.2017.09.008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Accounting Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105204571730036X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Accounting Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105204571730036X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了在审计委员会中有会计专家是否可以减轻先前研究中记录的养老金计划资产的预期收益率(ERR)的向上偏差。研究发现,在审计委员会中拥有会计专业知识的公司,误差率较低。在控制了现有治理和养老金研究的变量后,这些结果是稳健的,它们表明审计委员会会计专家可以帮助阻止管理者对养老金资产设定更高的ERRs。虽然现有研究发现养老金假设的机会设置可以通过监管加以控制,但本文为审计委员会会计专家对关键养老金估计的影响提供了新的证据。这种新发现的治理效应不同于以前在养老金会计文献中记录的监管效应,并且是增量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Setting expected rates of return on pension plan assets: New evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts

This study examines whether having accounting experts on audit committees can mitigate the upward bias of expected rates of return (ERR) on pension plan assets documented in prior research. ERRs are found to be lower in firms with accounting expertise on their audit committees. These results are robust after controlling for variables from extant governance and pension research, and they suggest that audit committee accounting experts can help deter managers from setting higher ERRs on pension assets. While extant studies find that opportunistic setting of pension assumptions can be controlled through regulation, this paper provides new evidence on the influence of audit committee accounting experts on critical pension estimates. This newfound governance effect is different from and incremental to the regulation effect previously documented in the pension accounting literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Value relevance of customer-related intangible assets Transparency and the audit industry? Not in the U.S. Evidence on audit production costs, profitability and partner compensation from the U.K. Financial statement comparability and segment disclosure The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1