开放获取放射学的管理控制:可能吗?

H Buchan, D Mant
{"title":"开放获取放射学的管理控制:可能吗?","authors":"H Buchan,&nbsp;D Mant","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper considers management options for limiting general practitioner use of open access radiology - a service for which there is increasing demand which is difficult to meet. In the current climate of cost containment, restriction of general practitioner access to these expensive diagnostic facilities has management appeal. However, it is difficult to justify blanket restriction of access to radiology services as there is no evidence that it would be economically or clinically sensible. An explicit quota system is unlikely to be feasible because of the small number of referrals made by general practitioners and the element of chance which will inevitably enter into the referral process. Managers should examine more closely the manipulation of incentives and costs which are used, often implicitly, to balance the conflicting desires of clinicians and managers. The best management option would appear to involve a re-evaluation of the role of the radiologist to include responsibility for managing the service. This should include assessment of appropriateness of referral by reference to guidelines for investigation and the behaviour of acknowledged good practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":75726,"journal":{"name":"Community medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"234-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042473","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management control of open-access radiology: is it possible?\",\"authors\":\"H Buchan,&nbsp;D Mant\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper considers management options for limiting general practitioner use of open access radiology - a service for which there is increasing demand which is difficult to meet. In the current climate of cost containment, restriction of general practitioner access to these expensive diagnostic facilities has management appeal. However, it is difficult to justify blanket restriction of access to radiology services as there is no evidence that it would be economically or clinically sensible. An explicit quota system is unlikely to be feasible because of the small number of referrals made by general practitioners and the element of chance which will inevitably enter into the referral process. Managers should examine more closely the manipulation of incentives and costs which are used, often implicitly, to balance the conflicting desires of clinicians and managers. The best management option would appear to involve a re-evaluation of the role of the radiologist to include responsibility for managing the service. This should include assessment of appropriateness of referral by reference to guidelines for investigation and the behaviour of acknowledged good practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"234-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042473\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了限制全科医生使用开放获取放射学的管理选择-这是一种难以满足的需求不断增加的服务。在当前成本控制的环境下,限制全科医生使用这些昂贵的诊断设施具有管理层的吸引力。然而,很难证明全面限制获得放射学服务是合理的,因为没有证据表明这在经济上或临床上是合理的。明确的配额制度不太可能可行,因为全科医生转诊的人数很少,而且转诊过程中不可避免地会有偶然因素。管理人员应该更仔细地检查激励和成本的操纵,这些激励和成本通常隐含地用于平衡临床医生和管理人员相互冲突的愿望。最好的管理方案似乎包括重新评估放射科医生的角色,包括管理服务的责任。这应包括参照调查指南和公认的良好从业人员的行为来评估转诊的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management control of open-access radiology: is it possible?

This paper considers management options for limiting general practitioner use of open access radiology - a service for which there is increasing demand which is difficult to meet. In the current climate of cost containment, restriction of general practitioner access to these expensive diagnostic facilities has management appeal. However, it is difficult to justify blanket restriction of access to radiology services as there is no evidence that it would be economically or clinically sensible. An explicit quota system is unlikely to be feasible because of the small number of referrals made by general practitioners and the element of chance which will inevitably enter into the referral process. Managers should examine more closely the manipulation of incentives and costs which are used, often implicitly, to balance the conflicting desires of clinicians and managers. The best management option would appear to involve a re-evaluation of the role of the radiologist to include responsibility for managing the service. This should include assessment of appropriateness of referral by reference to guidelines for investigation and the behaviour of acknowledged good practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of diagnosis-related groups in the National Health Service. Economic analysis in the evaluation of health promotion. A report of the investigation and control measures instituted after the isolation of toxin-producing Corynebacterium diphtheriae mitis from a child in Leeds. Communicable disease report. April to June 1989. The PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre. Women's knowledge and experience of cervical screening: a failure of health education and medical organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1