错失目标:对马克·罗伊关于美国股市短期主义的新书的评论

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Pub Date : 2022-06-11 DOI:10.1111/jacf.12506
Tom Gosling
{"title":"错失目标:对马克·罗伊关于美国股市短期主义的新书的评论","authors":"Tom Gosling","doi":"10.1111/jacf.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The narrative of pervasive short-termism caused by the stock market, and the need to protect corporations and the economy from it, is now a well established one. Frenetic short-term trading and aggressive activists chasing immediate increases in profit prevent corporations from thinking about the requirements for their own long-run success. Institutional investors squeeze cash out of the corporate sector by pressuring companies into excessive share buybacks instead of supporting long-term investments in R&amp;D and skills development. The relentless pressure for short-term results also causes companies to neglect long-term social problems like climate change, human rights, and inequality as they seek to meet the stock market's expectations for quarterly earnings.</p><p>That this set of views is so widely accepted, and allowed to pass unchallenged, even in relatively sophisticated business and policy-making circles, makes Mark Roe's new book particularly important and timely. In a measured, balanced, and utterly non-polemical fashion, and using the highest quality academic evidence, the Harvard Law professor weighs the evidence for and against the charge that stock-market short-termism is a serious problem for the U.S. economy. Spoiler alert: he finds that there is no compelling case to answer. Stock-market-driven short-termism is at most a minor problem.</p><p>This finding matters because rather than railing against share buybacks, putting sand in the wheels of shareholder activism, and seeking to insulate corporate managers from investor pressure, Professor Roe contends that our policymakers should instead be focusing action on areas that are much more likely to have positive outcomes for society. Chief among them have been failure to resist the persistent decline in government-funded (not corporate sector) R&amp;D or to beef up regulation and regulatory staffing to ensure that companies bear the costs of externalities that are currently offloaded onto society.</p><p>While ignoring these opportunities, we continue to devote too much attention to policies and actions—such as efforts to tax buybacks and limit shareholder activism—that are bound to be ineffective at best, and counterproductive at worst. <i>Missing the Target</i> is essential reading for policymakers, regulators, and anyone else interested in corporate governance, financial markets, and regulation that can and will actually make a positive difference to the rest of us.</p>","PeriodicalId":46789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jacf.12506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missing the Target: A Review of Mark Roe's New Book on U.S. Stock-Market Short-Termism\",\"authors\":\"Tom Gosling\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jacf.12506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The narrative of pervasive short-termism caused by the stock market, and the need to protect corporations and the economy from it, is now a well established one. Frenetic short-term trading and aggressive activists chasing immediate increases in profit prevent corporations from thinking about the requirements for their own long-run success. Institutional investors squeeze cash out of the corporate sector by pressuring companies into excessive share buybacks instead of supporting long-term investments in R&amp;D and skills development. The relentless pressure for short-term results also causes companies to neglect long-term social problems like climate change, human rights, and inequality as they seek to meet the stock market's expectations for quarterly earnings.</p><p>That this set of views is so widely accepted, and allowed to pass unchallenged, even in relatively sophisticated business and policy-making circles, makes Mark Roe's new book particularly important and timely. In a measured, balanced, and utterly non-polemical fashion, and using the highest quality academic evidence, the Harvard Law professor weighs the evidence for and against the charge that stock-market short-termism is a serious problem for the U.S. economy. Spoiler alert: he finds that there is no compelling case to answer. Stock-market-driven short-termism is at most a minor problem.</p><p>This finding matters because rather than railing against share buybacks, putting sand in the wheels of shareholder activism, and seeking to insulate corporate managers from investor pressure, Professor Roe contends that our policymakers should instead be focusing action on areas that are much more likely to have positive outcomes for society. Chief among them have been failure to resist the persistent decline in government-funded (not corporate sector) R&amp;D or to beef up regulation and regulatory staffing to ensure that companies bear the costs of externalities that are currently offloaded onto society.</p><p>While ignoring these opportunities, we continue to devote too much attention to policies and actions—such as efforts to tax buybacks and limit shareholder activism—that are bound to be ineffective at best, and counterproductive at worst. <i>Missing the Target</i> is essential reading for policymakers, regulators, and anyone else interested in corporate governance, financial markets, and regulation that can and will actually make a positive difference to the rest of us.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jacf.12506\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacf.12506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacf.12506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股市引发的普遍短视主义,以及保护企业和经济免受短视影响的必要性,如今已成为公认的观点。狂热的短期交易和追求利润即刻增长的激进激进分子,阻止了企业思考自身长期成功的要求。机构投资者通过迫使企业过度回购股票,而不是支持研发和技能开发方面的长期投资,从企业部门挤出现金。追求短期业绩的无情压力,也导致企业在寻求满足股市对季度收益的预期时,忽视了气候变化、人权和不平等等长期社会问题。这一套观点被广泛接受,甚至在相对成熟的商业和政策制定圈子里也不受质疑,这使得马克·罗伊的新书显得尤为重要和及时。这位哈佛大学法学教授以一种有节制、平衡、完全没有争议的方式,利用最高质量的学术证据,权衡了支持和反对股市短期主义是美国经济严重问题的证据。剧透警告:他发现没有令人信服的案件需要回答。股市驱动的短视主义顶多是个小问题。这一发现很重要,因为罗伊教授认为,我们的政策制定者应该把行动重点放在更有可能对社会产生积极影响的领域,而不是谴责股票回购,阻挠股东激进主义,并试图使公司经理免受投资者的压力。其中最主要的是未能抵制政府资助(而非企业部门)研发持续下降的趋势,也未能加强监管和监管人员配备,以确保企业承担目前转嫁给社会的外部性成本。在忽视这些机会的同时,我们继续把过多的注意力放在政策和行动上——比如对回购征税和限制股东维权的努力——这些政策和行动往好了说必然是无效的,往坏了说必然是适得其反的。对于政策制定者、监管者,以及任何对公司治理、金融市场和监管感兴趣的人来说,《错失目标》都是必读之书,因为它们能够而且将会对我们其他人产生积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Missing the Target: A Review of Mark Roe's New Book on U.S. Stock-Market Short-Termism

The narrative of pervasive short-termism caused by the stock market, and the need to protect corporations and the economy from it, is now a well established one. Frenetic short-term trading and aggressive activists chasing immediate increases in profit prevent corporations from thinking about the requirements for their own long-run success. Institutional investors squeeze cash out of the corporate sector by pressuring companies into excessive share buybacks instead of supporting long-term investments in R&D and skills development. The relentless pressure for short-term results also causes companies to neglect long-term social problems like climate change, human rights, and inequality as they seek to meet the stock market's expectations for quarterly earnings.

That this set of views is so widely accepted, and allowed to pass unchallenged, even in relatively sophisticated business and policy-making circles, makes Mark Roe's new book particularly important and timely. In a measured, balanced, and utterly non-polemical fashion, and using the highest quality academic evidence, the Harvard Law professor weighs the evidence for and against the charge that stock-market short-termism is a serious problem for the U.S. economy. Spoiler alert: he finds that there is no compelling case to answer. Stock-market-driven short-termism is at most a minor problem.

This finding matters because rather than railing against share buybacks, putting sand in the wheels of shareholder activism, and seeking to insulate corporate managers from investor pressure, Professor Roe contends that our policymakers should instead be focusing action on areas that are much more likely to have positive outcomes for society. Chief among them have been failure to resist the persistent decline in government-funded (not corporate sector) R&D or to beef up regulation and regulatory staffing to ensure that companies bear the costs of externalities that are currently offloaded onto society.

While ignoring these opportunities, we continue to devote too much attention to policies and actions—such as efforts to tax buybacks and limit shareholder activism—that are bound to be ineffective at best, and counterproductive at worst. Missing the Target is essential reading for policymakers, regulators, and anyone else interested in corporate governance, financial markets, and regulation that can and will actually make a positive difference to the rest of us.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Michael C. Jensen: Scholar, mentor, colleague Michael Jensen's contributions to the theory of the firm: A tribute in three acts A message from the editor Issue Information - TOC A message from the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1