量化澳大利亚创新在整个经济中的回报

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-04-23 DOI:10.1111/1467-8454.12262
Katherine Wynn, Mingji Liu, Jasmine Cohen
{"title":"量化澳大利亚创新在整个经济中的回报","authors":"Katherine Wynn,&nbsp;Mingji Liu,&nbsp;Jasmine Cohen","doi":"10.1111/1467-8454.12262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Innovation plays a vital role in driving Australia's economic growth, and the desire to quantify this relationship is ever present. This article quantifies the relationship between domestic gross expenditure on research and development (R&amp;D) and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita growth to estimate the return on investment (ROI) to innovation for Australia. This article adopts the Jones and Summers (2020) approach to quantify the ROI of gross R&amp;D spending for Australia. This novel yet simple macroeconomic approach complements other existing methodologies. It quantifies only economic benefits, excluding non-monetary societal and environmental benefits. The baseline results state that $1 of R&amp;D investment creates an average of $20.8 in economy-wide benefits in today's dollars, and investment in R&amp;D creates an average annual return of 104% for Australia. Importantly, this baseline result can be recalculated with adjustments to account for specific features of innovation activity. Incorporating a 10-year delay between R&amp;D and payoffs, combined with a correction for building R&amp;D into new capital inputs (known as embodied capital deepening) to account for the additional time and costs associated with R&amp;D expenditure yields lower results of $3.5 of economy-wide benefits and 10% average annual return for every dollar spent on R&amp;D. Even when corrections are applied to the baseline for conservative estimates, the economy-wide returns to innovation are comparable to historical private investment returns in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8454.12262","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the economy-wide returns to innovation for Australia\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Wynn,&nbsp;Mingji Liu,&nbsp;Jasmine Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8454.12262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Innovation plays a vital role in driving Australia's economic growth, and the desire to quantify this relationship is ever present. This article quantifies the relationship between domestic gross expenditure on research and development (R&amp;D) and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita growth to estimate the return on investment (ROI) to innovation for Australia. This article adopts the Jones and Summers (2020) approach to quantify the ROI of gross R&amp;D spending for Australia. This novel yet simple macroeconomic approach complements other existing methodologies. It quantifies only economic benefits, excluding non-monetary societal and environmental benefits. The baseline results state that $1 of R&amp;D investment creates an average of $20.8 in economy-wide benefits in today's dollars, and investment in R&amp;D creates an average annual return of 104% for Australia. Importantly, this baseline result can be recalculated with adjustments to account for specific features of innovation activity. Incorporating a 10-year delay between R&amp;D and payoffs, combined with a correction for building R&amp;D into new capital inputs (known as embodied capital deepening) to account for the additional time and costs associated with R&amp;D expenditure yields lower results of $3.5 of economy-wide benefits and 10% average annual return for every dollar spent on R&amp;D. Even when corrections are applied to the baseline for conservative estimates, the economy-wide returns to innovation are comparable to historical private investment returns in Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8454.12262\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8454.12262\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8454.12262","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创新在推动澳大利亚经济增长方面发挥着至关重要的作用,量化这种关系的愿望一直存在。本文量化了国内研发总支出(R&D)与人均国内生产总值(GDP)增长之间的关系,以估计澳大利亚创新的投资回报率(ROI)。本文采用Jones和Summers(2020)的方法来量化澳大利亚总研发支出的投资回报率。这种新颖而简单的宏观经济方法是对其他现有方法的补充。它只量化经济效益,不包括非货币性的社会和环境效益。基线结果表明,以今天的美元计算,1美元的研发投资平均创造20.8美元的经济效益,而研发投资为澳大利亚创造了104%的平均年回报率。重要的是,这个基线结果可以通过调整来重新计算,以考虑创新活动的具体特征。将研发与回报之间的10年延迟,结合将研发纳入新资本投入的修正(称为隐含资本深化),以解释与研发支出相关的额外时间和成本,产生较低的结果,即3.5美元的经济效益和研发每花费1美元的平均年回报率为10%。即使对保守估计的基线进行修正,整个经济的创新回报也与澳大利亚历史上的私人投资回报相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying the economy-wide returns to innovation for Australia

Innovation plays a vital role in driving Australia's economic growth, and the desire to quantify this relationship is ever present. This article quantifies the relationship between domestic gross expenditure on research and development (R&D) and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita growth to estimate the return on investment (ROI) to innovation for Australia. This article adopts the Jones and Summers (2020) approach to quantify the ROI of gross R&D spending for Australia. This novel yet simple macroeconomic approach complements other existing methodologies. It quantifies only economic benefits, excluding non-monetary societal and environmental benefits. The baseline results state that $1 of R&D investment creates an average of $20.8 in economy-wide benefits in today's dollars, and investment in R&D creates an average annual return of 104% for Australia. Importantly, this baseline result can be recalculated with adjustments to account for specific features of innovation activity. Incorporating a 10-year delay between R&D and payoffs, combined with a correction for building R&D into new capital inputs (known as embodied capital deepening) to account for the additional time and costs associated with R&D expenditure yields lower results of $3.5 of economy-wide benefits and 10% average annual return for every dollar spent on R&D. Even when corrections are applied to the baseline for conservative estimates, the economy-wide returns to innovation are comparable to historical private investment returns in Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1