在哈萨克斯坦共和国塞米巴拉金斯克核试验场附近居民点使用不同回顾性剂量学方法进行的外剂量估计比较。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Radiation Research Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrad082
Valeriy Stepanenko, Sergey Shinkarev, Andrey Kaprin, Kazbek Apsalikov, Sergey Ivanov, Peter Shegay, Evgenia Ostroumova, Ausrele Kesminiene, Alexandra Lipikhina, Viktoria Bogacheva, Kassym Zhumadilov, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Aya Sakaguchi, Satoru Endo, Nariaki Fujimoto, Bernd Grosche, Vladimir Iatsenko, Alla Androsova, Zukhra Apsalikova, Noriyuki Kawano, Masaharu Hoshi
{"title":"在哈萨克斯坦共和国塞米巴拉金斯克核试验场附近居民点使用不同回顾性剂量学方法进行的外剂量估计比较。","authors":"Valeriy Stepanenko, Sergey Shinkarev, Andrey Kaprin, Kazbek Apsalikov, Sergey Ivanov, Peter Shegay, Evgenia Ostroumova, Ausrele Kesminiene, Alexandra Lipikhina, Viktoria Bogacheva, Kassym Zhumadilov, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Aya Sakaguchi, Satoru Endo, Nariaki Fujimoto, Bernd Grosche, Vladimir Iatsenko, Alla Androsova, Zukhra Apsalikova, Noriyuki Kawano, Masaharu Hoshi","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrad082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For correct assessment of health risks after low-dose irradiation, calculation of radiation exposure estimates is crucial. To verify the calculated absorbed doses, instrumental methods of retrospective dosimetry are used. We compared calculated and instrumental-based estimates of external absorbed doses in the residents of Dolon, Mostik and Cheremushki villages, Kazakhstan, affected by the first nuclear weapon test performed at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS) on August 29, 1949. The 'instrumental' doses were retrospectively estimated using the Luminescence Retrospective Dosimetry (LRD) and Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) methods. Correlation between the calculated individual cumulative external absorbed whole-body doses based on typical input data and ESR-based individual doses in the same people was strong (r = 0.782). It was even stronger between the calculated doses based on individual questionnaires' input data and the ESR-based doses (r = 0.940). Application of the LRD method is useful for validation of the calculated settlement-average cumulated external absorbed dose to air. Reconstruction of external exposure can be supplemented with the data from later measurements of soil contamination with long-lived radionuclides, such as, 137Cs. Our results show the reliability of the calculational method used for the retrospective assessment of individual external doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":"36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of external dose estimates using different retrospective dosimetry methods in the settlements located near Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, Republic of Kazakhstan.\",\"authors\":\"Valeriy Stepanenko, Sergey Shinkarev, Andrey Kaprin, Kazbek Apsalikov, Sergey Ivanov, Peter Shegay, Evgenia Ostroumova, Ausrele Kesminiene, Alexandra Lipikhina, Viktoria Bogacheva, Kassym Zhumadilov, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Aya Sakaguchi, Satoru Endo, Nariaki Fujimoto, Bernd Grosche, Vladimir Iatsenko, Alla Androsova, Zukhra Apsalikova, Noriyuki Kawano, Masaharu Hoshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrr/rrad082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For correct assessment of health risks after low-dose irradiation, calculation of radiation exposure estimates is crucial. To verify the calculated absorbed doses, instrumental methods of retrospective dosimetry are used. We compared calculated and instrumental-based estimates of external absorbed doses in the residents of Dolon, Mostik and Cheremushki villages, Kazakhstan, affected by the first nuclear weapon test performed at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS) on August 29, 1949. The 'instrumental' doses were retrospectively estimated using the Luminescence Retrospective Dosimetry (LRD) and Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) methods. Correlation between the calculated individual cumulative external absorbed whole-body doses based on typical input data and ESR-based individual doses in the same people was strong (r = 0.782). It was even stronger between the calculated doses based on individual questionnaires' input data and the ESR-based doses (r = 0.940). Application of the LRD method is useful for validation of the calculated settlement-average cumulated external absorbed dose to air. Reconstruction of external exposure can be supplemented with the data from later measurements of soil contamination with long-lived radionuclides, such as, 137Cs. Our results show the reliability of the calculational method used for the retrospective assessment of individual external doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"36-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrad082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了正确评估低剂量辐照后的健康风险,辐射照射估计的计算至关重要。为了验证计算的吸收剂量,使用回顾性剂量测定的仪器方法。我们比较了1949年8月29日在塞米巴拉金斯克核试验场(SNTS)进行的第一次核武器试验对哈萨克斯坦Dolon、Mostik和Cheremushki村居民外部吸收剂量的计算和基于仪器的估计。使用发光回顾性剂量法(LRD)和电子自旋共振(ESR)方法对“仪器”剂量进行回顾性估计。基于典型输入数据计算的个体累积外部吸收全身剂量与基于esr的同一人群个体剂量之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.782)。基于个人问卷输入数据计算的剂量与基于esr的剂量之间的相关性更强(r = 0.940)。LRD法的应用有助于验证计算的沉降-平均累积外空气吸收剂量。外部暴露的重建可以用后来对土壤污染的长寿命放射性核素(如137Cs)的测量数据加以补充。我们的结果表明,用于个体外剂量回顾性评估的计算方法是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of external dose estimates using different retrospective dosimetry methods in the settlements located near Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site, Republic of Kazakhstan.

For correct assessment of health risks after low-dose irradiation, calculation of radiation exposure estimates is crucial. To verify the calculated absorbed doses, instrumental methods of retrospective dosimetry are used. We compared calculated and instrumental-based estimates of external absorbed doses in the residents of Dolon, Mostik and Cheremushki villages, Kazakhstan, affected by the first nuclear weapon test performed at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site (SNTS) on August 29, 1949. The 'instrumental' doses were retrospectively estimated using the Luminescence Retrospective Dosimetry (LRD) and Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) methods. Correlation between the calculated individual cumulative external absorbed whole-body doses based on typical input data and ESR-based individual doses in the same people was strong (r = 0.782). It was even stronger between the calculated doses based on individual questionnaires' input data and the ESR-based doses (r = 0.940). Application of the LRD method is useful for validation of the calculated settlement-average cumulated external absorbed dose to air. Reconstruction of external exposure can be supplemented with the data from later measurements of soil contamination with long-lived radionuclides, such as, 137Cs. Our results show the reliability of the calculational method used for the retrospective assessment of individual external doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal. Articles considered fall into two broad categories: Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable. Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences. Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry. The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of acrylic phantom for use in quality assurance of BNCT beam output procedure. Cost-effectiveness analysis for multi adverse events of proton beam therapy for pediatric medulloblastoma in Japan. Feasibility of creating a daily adaptive plan using automatic DIR-created target and OARs contours in patients with prostate cancer magnetic-resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern magnetic resonance imaging era may be omitted: a propensity score-matched analysis. Elevated α/β ratio after hypofractionated radiotherapy correlated with DNA damage repairment in an experimental model of prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1