[注射速度对高压布比卡因和丁卡因阻滞特性的影响]。

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1989-07-01
R Janik, W Dick, M Stanton-Hicks
{"title":"[注射速度对高压布比卡因和丁卡因阻滞特性的影响]。","authors":"R Janik,&nbsp;W Dick,&nbsp;M Stanton-Hicks","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A lack of uniform methodology used in the assessment of different injection speeds in spinal anesthesia by different authors formed the basis of the current study, which compared under randomized conditions the effects of various injection speeds during intrathecal administration of 4 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty male ASA Physical Status II and III patients scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia were selected. They were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Patients were given 4 ml of either 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine according to the following scheme: I: 4 ml tetracaine/0.25 ml.s-1; II: 4 ml tetracaine/0.5 ml.s-1: III: 4 ml bupivacaine/0.25 ml.s-1; IV: 4 ml bupivacaine/0.5 ml.s-1. The study was carried out in a double-blind fashion and puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace using a 25-gauge needle with the patient in the sitting position. Following injection of the anesthetic solution (0.25 ml.s-1 or 0.5 ml.s-1 without barbotage), the patient was immediately placed in the lithotomy position with the table remaining horizontal. The level of anesthesia using pin prick and the degree of motor blockade, using a 0 to 3+ scale where 0 represented no motor weakness and 3+ complete motor block, were assessed at specific intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test: P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. Bupivacaine injected at 0.25 ml.s-1 was associated with a higher dermatome level than at 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05). Time to highest dermatome, however, was shorter with bupivacaine 0.5 ml.s-1 compared to 0.25 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05) (Table 3, Fig. 1). Time to highest level of analgesia was shorter with tetracaine 0.25 ml.s-1 compared to 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05) (Fig. 2). At 0.25 ml.s-1, tetracaine achieved the highest dermatome faster than bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). Tetracaine injected at 0.5 ml.s-1, however, was associated with a higher segmental level than bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). At 0.25 ml.s-1 bupivacaine and tetracaine achieved a 3+ motor block faster than at 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05). Complete motor blockade, however, was significantly longer with tetracaine at both injection speeds (0.25 and 0.5 ml.s-1) compared to bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that 4 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or tetracaine injected at 0.25 or 0.5 ml.s-1 provides a rapid and reproducible spread of analgesia for transurethral surgery. However, our findings suggest that speed of injection is of little i</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"12 4","pages":"63-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The effect of the injection speed on the blockade characteristics of hyperbaric bupivacaine and tetracaine in spinal anesthesia].\",\"authors\":\"R Janik,&nbsp;W Dick,&nbsp;M Stanton-Hicks\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A lack of uniform methodology used in the assessment of different injection speeds in spinal anesthesia by different authors formed the basis of the current study, which compared under randomized conditions the effects of various injection speeds during intrathecal administration of 4 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty male ASA Physical Status II and III patients scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia were selected. They were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Patients were given 4 ml of either 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine according to the following scheme: I: 4 ml tetracaine/0.25 ml.s-1; II: 4 ml tetracaine/0.5 ml.s-1: III: 4 ml bupivacaine/0.25 ml.s-1; IV: 4 ml bupivacaine/0.5 ml.s-1. The study was carried out in a double-blind fashion and puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace using a 25-gauge needle with the patient in the sitting position. Following injection of the anesthetic solution (0.25 ml.s-1 or 0.5 ml.s-1 without barbotage), the patient was immediately placed in the lithotomy position with the table remaining horizontal. The level of anesthesia using pin prick and the degree of motor blockade, using a 0 to 3+ scale where 0 represented no motor weakness and 3+ complete motor block, were assessed at specific intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test: P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. Bupivacaine injected at 0.25 ml.s-1 was associated with a higher dermatome level than at 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05). Time to highest dermatome, however, was shorter with bupivacaine 0.5 ml.s-1 compared to 0.25 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05) (Table 3, Fig. 1). Time to highest level of analgesia was shorter with tetracaine 0.25 ml.s-1 compared to 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05) (Fig. 2). At 0.25 ml.s-1, tetracaine achieved the highest dermatome faster than bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). Tetracaine injected at 0.5 ml.s-1, however, was associated with a higher segmental level than bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). At 0.25 ml.s-1 bupivacaine and tetracaine achieved a 3+ motor block faster than at 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05). Complete motor blockade, however, was significantly longer with tetracaine at both injection speeds (0.25 and 0.5 ml.s-1) compared to bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that 4 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or tetracaine injected at 0.25 or 0.5 ml.s-1 provides a rapid and reproducible spread of analgesia for transurethral surgery. However, our findings suggest that speed of injection is of little i</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"63-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏统一的方法来评估不同作者在脊髓麻醉中不同的注射速度,因此本研究在随机条件下比较了鞘内给药4ml 0.5%高压布比卡因或0.5%高压丁卡因时不同注射速度的影响。材料和方法。选择80例ASA身体状态为II和III的男性患者在脊髓麻醉下行经尿道前列腺切除术。他们被随机分成四组,每组20人。患者按以下方案给予4 ml 0.5%高压布比卡因或0.5%高压丁卡因:1:4 ml丁卡因/0.25 ml.s-1;II:丁卡因4 ml /0.5 ml.s-1; III:布比卡因4 ml /0.25 ml.s-1;静脉注射:布比卡因4ml /0.5 ml.s-1。该研究以双盲方式进行,使用25号针在L3-4间隙穿刺,患者处于坐姿。注射麻醉溶液(0.25 ml.s-1或0.5 ml.s-1)后,立即将患者置于取石位,保持桌面水平。针刺麻醉水平和运动阻滞程度采用0 - 3+评分,其中0代表无运动无力,3+代表完全运动阻滞,每隔一段时间评估一次。采用Mann-Whitney秩和检验进行统计学分析,认为P值小于0.05有统计学意义。结果。注射剂量为0.25 ml.s-1的布比卡因与皮肤组织的相关性高于注射剂量为0.5 ml.s-1的布比卡因(P < 0.05)。然而,与0.25 ml.s-1相比,布比卡因0.5 ml.s-1组达到最高皮节的时间更短(P < 0.05)(表3,图1)。与0.5 ml.s-1相比,丁卡因0.25 ml.s-1组达到最高镇痛水平的时间更短(P < 0.05)(图2)。在0.25 ml.s-1组,丁卡因比布比卡因更快达到最高皮节(P < 0.05)。而注射剂量为0.5 ml.s-1的丁卡因,其节段水平高于布比卡因(P < 0.05)。布比卡因和丁卡因在0.25 ml.s-1时比在0.5 ml.s-1时更快达到3+运动阻滞(P < 0.05)。然而,与布比卡因相比,丁卡因在注射速度(0.25和0.5 ml.s-1)下的完全运动阻断时间明显更长(P < 0.05)。结论。结果表明,4 ml 0.5%高压布比卡因或丁卡因以0.25或0.5 ml.s-1注射可为经尿道手术提供快速且可重复的镇痛扩散。然而,我们的研究结果表明,注射速度很小
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The effect of the injection speed on the blockade characteristics of hyperbaric bupivacaine and tetracaine in spinal anesthesia].

A lack of uniform methodology used in the assessment of different injection speeds in spinal anesthesia by different authors formed the basis of the current study, which compared under randomized conditions the effects of various injection speeds during intrathecal administration of 4 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty male ASA Physical Status II and III patients scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate under spinal anesthesia were selected. They were randomly divided into four groups of 20 each. Patients were given 4 ml of either 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 0.5% hyperbaric tetracaine according to the following scheme: I: 4 ml tetracaine/0.25 ml.s-1; II: 4 ml tetracaine/0.5 ml.s-1: III: 4 ml bupivacaine/0.25 ml.s-1; IV: 4 ml bupivacaine/0.5 ml.s-1. The study was carried out in a double-blind fashion and puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace using a 25-gauge needle with the patient in the sitting position. Following injection of the anesthetic solution (0.25 ml.s-1 or 0.5 ml.s-1 without barbotage), the patient was immediately placed in the lithotomy position with the table remaining horizontal. The level of anesthesia using pin prick and the degree of motor blockade, using a 0 to 3+ scale where 0 represented no motor weakness and 3+ complete motor block, were assessed at specific intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test: P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS. Bupivacaine injected at 0.25 ml.s-1 was associated with a higher dermatome level than at 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05). Time to highest dermatome, however, was shorter with bupivacaine 0.5 ml.s-1 compared to 0.25 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05) (Table 3, Fig. 1). Time to highest level of analgesia was shorter with tetracaine 0.25 ml.s-1 compared to 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05) (Fig. 2). At 0.25 ml.s-1, tetracaine achieved the highest dermatome faster than bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). Tetracaine injected at 0.5 ml.s-1, however, was associated with a higher segmental level than bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). At 0.25 ml.s-1 bupivacaine and tetracaine achieved a 3+ motor block faster than at 0.5 ml.s-1 (P less than 0.05). Complete motor blockade, however, was significantly longer with tetracaine at both injection speeds (0.25 and 0.5 ml.s-1) compared to bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that 4 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or tetracaine injected at 0.25 or 0.5 ml.s-1 provides a rapid and reproducible spread of analgesia for transurethral surgery. However, our findings suggest that speed of injection is of little i

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1