儿童与美国社会安全网:平衡成人的不利因素与儿童的有利因素。

IF 6.9 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1257/jep.36.2.149
Anna Aizer, Hilary Hoynes, Adriana Lleras-Muney
{"title":"儿童与美国社会安全网:平衡成人的不利因素与儿童的有利因素。","authors":"Anna Aizer, Hilary Hoynes, Adriana Lleras-Muney","doi":"10.1257/jep.36.2.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A hallmark of every developed nation is the provision of a social safety net-a collection of public programs that deliver aid to the poor. Because of their higher rates of poverty, children are often a major beneficiary of safety net programs. Countries vary considerably in both the amount of safety net aid to children and the design of their programs. The United States provides less aid to families with children as a share of GDP (0.6 percent) than most countries: Among 37 OECD countries, only Turkey provides less, as shown in Figure 1. Countries that provide less aid to families with children have higher rates of child poverty. Among these same 37 countries, only Turkey and Costa Rica have higher child poverty rates than the United States. Why does the United States appear to be such an outlier in terms of the amount of aid it provides to families and child poverty rates? While there are likely multiple reasons, in this paper we focus on one possible explanation: Past emphasis on the negative behavioral effects of safety net programs for families over the benefits of such programs for children.</p>","PeriodicalId":15611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Perspectives","volume":"36 2","pages":"149-174"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children and the US Social Safety Net: Balancing Disincentives for Adults and Benefits for Children.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Aizer, Hilary Hoynes, Adriana Lleras-Muney\",\"doi\":\"10.1257/jep.36.2.149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A hallmark of every developed nation is the provision of a social safety net-a collection of public programs that deliver aid to the poor. Because of their higher rates of poverty, children are often a major beneficiary of safety net programs. Countries vary considerably in both the amount of safety net aid to children and the design of their programs. The United States provides less aid to families with children as a share of GDP (0.6 percent) than most countries: Among 37 OECD countries, only Turkey provides less, as shown in Figure 1. Countries that provide less aid to families with children have higher rates of child poverty. Among these same 37 countries, only Turkey and Costa Rica have higher child poverty rates than the United States. Why does the United States appear to be such an outlier in terms of the amount of aid it provides to families and child poverty rates? While there are likely multiple reasons, in this paper we focus on one possible explanation: Past emphasis on the negative behavioral effects of safety net programs for families over the benefits of such programs for children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"149-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.2.149\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.36.2.149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每个发达国家的一个特点是提供社会安全网——一系列向穷人提供援助的公共项目。由于儿童的贫困率较高,他们往往是社会安全网项目的主要受益者。各国在为儿童提供的安全网援助数量和方案设计方面差异很大。美国为有孩子的家庭提供的援助占GDP的比例(0.6%)低于大多数国家:在37个经合组织国家中,只有土耳其提供的援助比美国少,如图1所示。对有孩子的家庭提供较少援助的国家,其儿童贫困率较高。在这37个国家中,只有土耳其和哥斯达黎加的儿童贫困率高于美国。为什么美国在为家庭提供的援助数量和儿童贫困率方面显得如此异常?虽然可能有多种原因,但在本文中,我们将重点放在一个可能的解释上:过去强调安全网计划对家庭的负面行为影响,而不是这些计划对儿童的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Children and the US Social Safety Net: Balancing Disincentives for Adults and Benefits for Children.

A hallmark of every developed nation is the provision of a social safety net-a collection of public programs that deliver aid to the poor. Because of their higher rates of poverty, children are often a major beneficiary of safety net programs. Countries vary considerably in both the amount of safety net aid to children and the design of their programs. The United States provides less aid to families with children as a share of GDP (0.6 percent) than most countries: Among 37 OECD countries, only Turkey provides less, as shown in Figure 1. Countries that provide less aid to families with children have higher rates of child poverty. Among these same 37 countries, only Turkey and Costa Rica have higher child poverty rates than the United States. Why does the United States appear to be such an outlier in terms of the amount of aid it provides to families and child poverty rates? While there are likely multiple reasons, in this paper we focus on one possible explanation: Past emphasis on the negative behavioral effects of safety net programs for families over the benefits of such programs for children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP) bridges the gap between general interest press and typical academic economics journals. It aims to publish articles that synthesize economic research, analyze public policy issues, encourage interdisciplinary thinking, and offer accessible insights into state-of-the-art economic concepts. The journal also serves to suggest future research directions, provide materials for classroom use, and address issues within the economics profession. Articles are typically solicited by editors and associate editors, and proposals for topics and authors can be directed to the journal office.
期刊最新文献
The Evolution of Work from Home The Economics of Electricity Reliability The Economics Profession’s Socioeconomic Diversity Problem Why Did the Best Prepared Country in the World Fare So Poorly during COVID? Recommendations for Further Reading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1