对自制和商业婴儿食品的质量和安全方面的评估。

Juliana Sarmiento-Santos, Leticia Arca da Silva, Carla A Monaco Lourenço, Roice Eliana Rosim, Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira, Sérgio Henrique Monteiro, Fernanda Maria Vanin
{"title":"对自制和商业婴儿食品的质量和安全方面的评估。","authors":"Juliana Sarmiento-Santos, Leticia Arca da Silva, Carla A Monaco Lourenço, Roice Eliana Rosim, Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira, Sérgio Henrique Monteiro, Fernanda Maria Vanin","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dietary Guidelines in some countries recommend avoiding commercially processed baby food, while others encourage the consultation of ingredients and nutritional information. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically analyze different baby foods obtained from commercial market and \"homemade\" produced, in order to verify whether comercial products have low nutritional and unsafety attributes. The samples were analyzed for chemical composition, physicochemical aspects, texture, microbiological and mycotoxin contamination, and pesticide residues. Results showed that, in general, commercial samples have a higher energy density and better ratio of macronutrients. The sodium, pH, and texture of both products were in accordance with the recommendations. None of the baby foods evaluated were contaminated with yeast and molds, total coliforms, or Escherichia coli; however, Salmonella sp. was confirmed in one homemade sample. Pesticide residues were detected in all analyzed baby food samples; however, at lower levels than the limit of quantification. Ochratoxin A was detected in one homemade baby food sample (5.76 µg /kg). Considering the samples evaluated, commercial baby food samples appeared to be safer in relation to microbiological, pesticide residue standards, and mycotoxin contamination. Therefore, it could be concluded that the quality of commercial and homemade baby foods still needs to be improved, as well as more studies related to a critical analyses of both types of processes used.</p>","PeriodicalId":94010,"journal":{"name":"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of quality and safety aspects of homemade and commercial baby foods.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Sarmiento-Santos, Leticia Arca da Silva, Carla A Monaco Lourenço, Roice Eliana Rosim, Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira, Sérgio Henrique Monteiro, Fernanda Maria Vanin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dietary Guidelines in some countries recommend avoiding commercially processed baby food, while others encourage the consultation of ingredients and nutritional information. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically analyze different baby foods obtained from commercial market and \\\"homemade\\\" produced, in order to verify whether comercial products have low nutritional and unsafety attributes. The samples were analyzed for chemical composition, physicochemical aspects, texture, microbiological and mycotoxin contamination, and pesticide residues. Results showed that, in general, commercial samples have a higher energy density and better ratio of macronutrients. The sodium, pH, and texture of both products were in accordance with the recommendations. None of the baby foods evaluated were contaminated with yeast and molds, total coliforms, or Escherichia coli; however, Salmonella sp. was confirmed in one homemade sample. Pesticide residues were detected in all analyzed baby food samples; however, at lower levels than the limit of quantification. Ochratoxin A was detected in one homemade baby food sample (5.76 µg /kg). Considering the samples evaluated, commercial baby food samples appeared to be safer in relation to microbiological, pesticide residue standards, and mycotoxin contamination. Therefore, it could be concluded that the quality of commercial and homemade baby foods still needs to be improved, as well as more studies related to a critical analyses of both types of processes used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些国家的膳食指南建议避免商业加工的婴儿食品,而另一些国家则鼓励咨询成分和营养信息。因此,本研究的目的是系统地分析从商业市场获得的不同婴儿食品和“自制”生产的不同婴儿食品,以验证商业产品是否具有低营养和不安全属性。分析了样品的化学成分、理化性质、质地、微生物和霉菌毒素污染以及农药残留。结果表明,一般情况下,商品样品具有较高的能量密度和较好的常量营养素比例。两种产品的钠、pH值和质地都符合建议。被评估的婴儿食品中没有酵母菌和霉菌、总大肠菌群或大肠杆菌污染;然而,在一个自制样品中证实了沙门氏菌。所有被分析的婴儿食品样本均检出农药残留;然而,在较低的水平上超过了量化的极限。自制婴儿食品中检出赭曲霉毒素A(5.76µg /kg)。考虑到评估的样品,商业婴儿食品样品在微生物、农药残留标准和霉菌毒素污染方面似乎更安全。因此,可以得出结论,商业和自制婴儿食品的质量仍然需要改进,以及对所使用的两种工艺进行批判性分析的更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of quality and safety aspects of homemade and commercial baby foods.

Dietary Guidelines in some countries recommend avoiding commercially processed baby food, while others encourage the consultation of ingredients and nutritional information. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically analyze different baby foods obtained from commercial market and "homemade" produced, in order to verify whether comercial products have low nutritional and unsafety attributes. The samples were analyzed for chemical composition, physicochemical aspects, texture, microbiological and mycotoxin contamination, and pesticide residues. Results showed that, in general, commercial samples have a higher energy density and better ratio of macronutrients. The sodium, pH, and texture of both products were in accordance with the recommendations. None of the baby foods evaluated were contaminated with yeast and molds, total coliforms, or Escherichia coli; however, Salmonella sp. was confirmed in one homemade sample. Pesticide residues were detected in all analyzed baby food samples; however, at lower levels than the limit of quantification. Ochratoxin A was detected in one homemade baby food sample (5.76 µg /kg). Considering the samples evaluated, commercial baby food samples appeared to be safer in relation to microbiological, pesticide residue standards, and mycotoxin contamination. Therefore, it could be concluded that the quality of commercial and homemade baby foods still needs to be improved, as well as more studies related to a critical analyses of both types of processes used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An optimized 3D-printed capsule scaffold utilizing artificial neural network for the targeted delivery of chlorogenic acid to the colon. Analysis of commercial fetal bovine serum (FBS) and its substitutes in the development of cultured meat. Analytical determination of tryptoquialanines A and B: Ensuring the quality and safety of orange juices. Assessment of quality and safety aspects of homemade and commercial baby foods. Bacterial community succession and volatile compound changes in Xinjiang smoked horsemeat sausage during fermentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1