S P Narayanan, S Mahapatra, H Rath, N N Nagarajan, M Mahakur
{"title":"提取还是保存?EXPRESS调查了东印度公共卫生机构患者对牙痛的偏好。","authors":"S P Narayanan, S Mahapatra, H Rath, N N Nagarajan, M Mahakur","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00085Narayanan07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate patients' preference for extraction or preservation for toothache and hypothetical anterior tooth pain along with the specific reason for their choice.</p><p><strong>Basic research design: </strong>Cross-sectional analytical semi-structured interview study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A sample of 703 adult dental outpatients visiting secondary and tertiary government health centres with toothache due to dental caries in Eastern India.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patients preferring restorative or extraction services for toothache, specific reason, and socio-demographic background factors for anterior and posterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (50.1%) choose preservation for present toothache and 79.9% for hypothetical front tooth pain. Immediate relief from toothache for extraction and the motive to preserve natural teeth for preservation were the main reasons expressed. In logistic regression, participants preferring extraction were more likely to be aged 25-34 years (OR = 1.94), 55+ years (OR=33.32), have primary and below education level (OR=1.99), have had a previous extraction (OR=1.99) and be unaware of preservation options (OR=2.34). For assumed anterior tooth pain, those between 25-34 years (OR=0.39) were more likely to choose preservation. Participants with primary and below education levels (OR=1.99) and unaware of preservation options (OR=1.95) chose extraction of the front tooth irrespective of their choice of treatment for the present toothache.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notable differences between the choices to preserve or extract a posterior tooth were not found. There was greater preference towards preserving anterior teeth. Future research should identify additional barriers to the preference and utilization of restorative services.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXtraction or PREServation? EXPRESS survey of patients' preference for toothache in public health facilities of Eastern India.\",\"authors\":\"S P Narayanan, S Mahapatra, H Rath, N N Nagarajan, M Mahakur\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/CDH_00085Narayanan07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate patients' preference for extraction or preservation for toothache and hypothetical anterior tooth pain along with the specific reason for their choice.</p><p><strong>Basic research design: </strong>Cross-sectional analytical semi-structured interview study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A sample of 703 adult dental outpatients visiting secondary and tertiary government health centres with toothache due to dental caries in Eastern India.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patients preferring restorative or extraction services for toothache, specific reason, and socio-demographic background factors for anterior and posterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (50.1%) choose preservation for present toothache and 79.9% for hypothetical front tooth pain. Immediate relief from toothache for extraction and the motive to preserve natural teeth for preservation were the main reasons expressed. In logistic regression, participants preferring extraction were more likely to be aged 25-34 years (OR = 1.94), 55+ years (OR=33.32), have primary and below education level (OR=1.99), have had a previous extraction (OR=1.99) and be unaware of preservation options (OR=2.34). For assumed anterior tooth pain, those between 25-34 years (OR=0.39) were more likely to choose preservation. Participants with primary and below education levels (OR=1.99) and unaware of preservation options (OR=1.95) chose extraction of the front tooth irrespective of their choice of treatment for the present toothache.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notable differences between the choices to preserve or extract a posterior tooth were not found. There was greater preference towards preserving anterior teeth. Future research should identify additional barriers to the preference and utilization of restorative services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community dental health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community dental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00085Narayanan07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00085Narayanan07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
EXtraction or PREServation? EXPRESS survey of patients' preference for toothache in public health facilities of Eastern India.
Objective: To investigate patients' preference for extraction or preservation for toothache and hypothetical anterior tooth pain along with the specific reason for their choice.
Basic research design: Cross-sectional analytical semi-structured interview study.
Participants: A sample of 703 adult dental outpatients visiting secondary and tertiary government health centres with toothache due to dental caries in Eastern India.
Main outcome measures: Patients preferring restorative or extraction services for toothache, specific reason, and socio-demographic background factors for anterior and posterior teeth.
Results: Half (50.1%) choose preservation for present toothache and 79.9% for hypothetical front tooth pain. Immediate relief from toothache for extraction and the motive to preserve natural teeth for preservation were the main reasons expressed. In logistic regression, participants preferring extraction were more likely to be aged 25-34 years (OR = 1.94), 55+ years (OR=33.32), have primary and below education level (OR=1.99), have had a previous extraction (OR=1.99) and be unaware of preservation options (OR=2.34). For assumed anterior tooth pain, those between 25-34 years (OR=0.39) were more likely to choose preservation. Participants with primary and below education levels (OR=1.99) and unaware of preservation options (OR=1.95) chose extraction of the front tooth irrespective of their choice of treatment for the present toothache.
Conclusion: Notable differences between the choices to preserve or extract a posterior tooth were not found. There was greater preference towards preserving anterior teeth. Future research should identify additional barriers to the preference and utilization of restorative services.
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with dental public health and related subjects. Dental public health is the science and the art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organised efforts of society.
The discipline covers a wide range and includes such topics as:
-oral epidemiology-
oral health services research-
preventive dentistry - especially in relation to communities-
oral health education and promotion-
clinical research - with particular emphasis on the care of special groups-
behavioural sciences related to dentistry-
decision theory-
quality of life-
risk analysis-
ethics and oral health economics-
quality assessment.
The journal publishes scientific articles on the relevant fields, review articles, discussion papers, news items, and editorials. It is of interest to dentists working in dental public health and to other professionals concerned with disease prevention, health service planning, and health promotion throughout the world. In the case of epidemiology of oral diseases the Journal prioritises national studies unless local studies have major methodological innovations or information of particular interest.