成人非选择性德尔尼多和圣托马斯心脏骤停:使用倾向匹配的早期临床经验分析。

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17539447231210713
Faizus Sazzad, Zhi Xian Ong, Geok Seen Ong, Hai Dong Luo, Si Guim Goh, Theo Kofidis, Sorokin Vitaly
{"title":"成人非选择性德尔尼多和圣托马斯心脏骤停:使用倾向匹配的早期临床经验分析。","authors":"Faizus Sazzad, Zhi Xian Ong, Geok Seen Ong, Hai Dong Luo, Si Guim Goh, Theo Kofidis, Sorokin Vitaly","doi":"10.1177/17539447231210713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) is a single-dose, high potassium, low-volume cardioplegia solution that has grown in favor recently. However, the use of DNC in the Asian population may be associated with certain challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and April 2022, DNC was used for myocardial protection in this single-center retrospective study. In total, 5731 patients underwent open heart surgeries, where 310 patients received DNC for single or multiple procedures. A total of 307 pair of propensity-matched patients from DNC and cold blood St. Thomas cardioplegia (STC) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5085 patients with STC and 310 patients with DNC from the cohort were matched, reflecting the initial group sizes before propensity matching. About 307 patient pairs were included in the final analysis after propensity matching with the interest variables. In the STC group, the requirement for an immediate postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was significantly higher [18 (5.9%) in DNC <i>versus</i> 28 (9.1%) in STC, <i>p</i> = 0.021]. A 30-day mortality was comparable between the DNC and STC groups (2.9% <i>versus</i> 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 1.00). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (2.6% <i>versus</i> 3.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.648) showed no difference between the groups. In both single and multiple procedure subgroups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and MACE incidences when comparing STC and DNC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of DNC in adults is acceptable and adaptable. Comparable clinical outcomes between STC patients and DNC were revealed by our investigation. There were no appreciable differences in 30-day mortality or MACE despite the STC group having a much higher need for immediate postoperative IABP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23035,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"17539447231210713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-selective Del Nido and St Thomas cardioplegia in adults: analysis of early clinical experience using propensity matching.\",\"authors\":\"Faizus Sazzad, Zhi Xian Ong, Geok Seen Ong, Hai Dong Luo, Si Guim Goh, Theo Kofidis, Sorokin Vitaly\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17539447231210713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) is a single-dose, high potassium, low-volume cardioplegia solution that has grown in favor recently. However, the use of DNC in the Asian population may be associated with certain challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and April 2022, DNC was used for myocardial protection in this single-center retrospective study. In total, 5731 patients underwent open heart surgeries, where 310 patients received DNC for single or multiple procedures. A total of 307 pair of propensity-matched patients from DNC and cold blood St. Thomas cardioplegia (STC) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5085 patients with STC and 310 patients with DNC from the cohort were matched, reflecting the initial group sizes before propensity matching. About 307 patient pairs were included in the final analysis after propensity matching with the interest variables. In the STC group, the requirement for an immediate postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was significantly higher [18 (5.9%) in DNC <i>versus</i> 28 (9.1%) in STC, <i>p</i> = 0.021]. A 30-day mortality was comparable between the DNC and STC groups (2.9% <i>versus</i> 3.3%, <i>p</i> = 1.00). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (2.6% <i>versus</i> 3.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.648) showed no difference between the groups. In both single and multiple procedure subgroups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and MACE incidences when comparing STC and DNC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of DNC in adults is acceptable and adaptable. Comparable clinical outcomes between STC patients and DNC were revealed by our investigation. There were no appreciable differences in 30-day mortality or MACE despite the STC group having a much higher need for immediate postoperative IABP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17539447231210713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447231210713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447231210713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Del Nido心脏停搏液(DNC)是一种单剂量、高钾、小体积的心脏停搏液,最近越来越受欢迎。然而,在亚洲人群中使用DNC可能存在一定的挑战。方法:在2017年1月至2022年4月的单中心回顾性研究中,DNC用于心肌保护。总共有5731名患者接受了心内直视手术,其中310名患者接受了单次或多次手术的DNC。对307对DNC和STC患者进行了倾向匹配的比较。结果:该队列共匹配了5085例STC患者和310例DNC患者,反映了倾向匹配前的初始群体规模。在与感兴趣变量进行倾向匹配后,最终分析纳入了约307对患者。在STC组,术后立即使用主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的需求明显更高[DNC组为18例(5.9%),STC组为28例(9.1%),p = 0.021]。DNC组和STC组的30天死亡率具有可比性(2.9%对3.3%,p = 1.00)。主要心脏不良事件(MACE) (2.6% vs 3.6%, p = 0.648)组间无差异。在单次和多次手术亚组中,与STC和DNC相比,30天死亡率和MACE发生率均无统计学差异。结论:在成人中使用DNC是可接受的,适应性强。我们的调查揭示了STC患者和DNC患者之间可比较的临床结果。尽管STC组对术后即刻IABP的需求要高得多,但30天死亡率和MACE没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-selective Del Nido and St Thomas cardioplegia in adults: analysis of early clinical experience using propensity matching.

Background: Del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) is a single-dose, high potassium, low-volume cardioplegia solution that has grown in favor recently. However, the use of DNC in the Asian population may be associated with certain challenges.

Methods: Between January 2017 and April 2022, DNC was used for myocardial protection in this single-center retrospective study. In total, 5731 patients underwent open heart surgeries, where 310 patients received DNC for single or multiple procedures. A total of 307 pair of propensity-matched patients from DNC and cold blood St. Thomas cardioplegia (STC) were compared.

Results: In total, 5085 patients with STC and 310 patients with DNC from the cohort were matched, reflecting the initial group sizes before propensity matching. About 307 patient pairs were included in the final analysis after propensity matching with the interest variables. In the STC group, the requirement for an immediate postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was significantly higher [18 (5.9%) in DNC versus 28 (9.1%) in STC, p = 0.021]. A 30-day mortality was comparable between the DNC and STC groups (2.9% versus 3.3%, p = 1.00). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (2.6% versus 3.6%, p = 0.648) showed no difference between the groups. In both single and multiple procedure subgroups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality and MACE incidences when comparing STC and DNC.

Conclusion: The use of DNC in adults is acceptable and adaptable. Comparable clinical outcomes between STC patients and DNC were revealed by our investigation. There were no appreciable differences in 30-day mortality or MACE despite the STC group having a much higher need for immediate postoperative IABP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is aimed at clinicians and researchers from the cardiovascular disease field and will be a forum for all views and reviews relating to this discipline.Topics covered will include: ·arteriosclerosis ·cardiomyopathies ·coronary artery disease ·diabetes ·heart failure ·hypertension ·metabolic syndrome ·obesity ·peripheral arterial disease ·stroke ·arrhythmias ·genetics
期刊最新文献
Evolocumab use in clinical practice in Switzerland: final data of the observational HEYMANS cohort study. The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasospastic angina: a review on diagnostic approach and management. Percutaneous image-guided management of a misplaced pericardiocentesis catheter into the inferior vena cava. Safety and potential usefulness of sequential intracoronary acetylcholine and ergonovine administration for spasm provocation testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1