了解穆斯林社区对心理健康问题的信仰和态度以及认知行为疗法作为一种治疗方法的可接受性:系统审查和专题综合。

Hind alHarbi, Paul Farrand, Ken Laidlaw
{"title":"了解穆斯林社区对心理健康问题的信仰和态度以及认知行为疗法作为一种治疗方法的可接受性:系统审查和专题综合。","authors":"Hind alHarbi, Paul Farrand, Ken Laidlaw","doi":"10.1007/s44192-023-00053-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muslims experience the lowest recovery rate from mental health difficulties across all religious groups. The aim of this research is to understand the barriers that prevent Muslims from accessing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and the extent to which these may vary across country of residence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and thematic synthesis for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in English and Arabic informed by the SPIDER search tool. Methodological quality and risk of bias of included papers were critically appraised independently according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A search of seven databases in the Arabic and English language yielded 3836 studies with 210 studies assessed for eligibility. Employing the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool resulted in 14 studies included in the thematic synthesis. Seven studies adopted a qualitative methodology employing semi-structured interviews and seven were quantitative descriptive studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Muslim communities experience barriers accessing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy at the level of the individual, culture, provider and management. The main barriers were experienced at the individual level which was dominated by the influence of Islam regarding the cause of mental health difficulties, which also influenced the way in which difficulties were managed.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO and registration number: CRD42020192854.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":"3 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the beliefs and attitudes towards mental health problems held by Muslim communities and acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as a treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Hind alHarbi, Paul Farrand, Ken Laidlaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44192-023-00053-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Muslims experience the lowest recovery rate from mental health difficulties across all religious groups. The aim of this research is to understand the barriers that prevent Muslims from accessing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and the extent to which these may vary across country of residence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and thematic synthesis for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in English and Arabic informed by the SPIDER search tool. Methodological quality and risk of bias of included papers were critically appraised independently according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A search of seven databases in the Arabic and English language yielded 3836 studies with 210 studies assessed for eligibility. Employing the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool resulted in 14 studies included in the thematic synthesis. Seven studies adopted a qualitative methodology employing semi-structured interviews and seven were quantitative descriptive studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Muslim communities experience barriers accessing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy at the level of the individual, culture, provider and management. The main barriers were experienced at the individual level which was dominated by the influence of Islam regarding the cause of mental health difficulties, which also influenced the way in which difficulties were managed.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO and registration number: CRD42020192854.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discover mental health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10667170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discover mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00053-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00053-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在所有宗教团体中,穆斯林从心理健康问题中恢复的比率最低。本研究的目的是了解阻止穆斯林接受认知行为疗法(CBT)的障碍,以及这些障碍在居住国家之间的差异程度。方法:通过SPIDER搜索工具对以英语和阿拉伯语发表的定量、定性和混合方法研究进行系统回顾和专题综合。纳入论文的方法学质量和偏倚风险根据混合方法评价工具进行独立的批判性评价。结果:检索了阿拉伯文和英文的7个数据库,得到3836项研究,其中210项研究被评估为合格。采用混合方法评估工具的结果是14项研究纳入专题综合。7项研究采用半结构化访谈的定性方法,7项研究采用定量描述性研究。结论:穆斯林社区在个体、文化、提供者和管理层面上存在认知行为治疗的障碍。主要的障碍是在个人层面上遇到的,主要是伊斯兰教对精神健康困难原因的影响,这也影响到处理困难的方式。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42020192854。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the beliefs and attitudes towards mental health problems held by Muslim communities and acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as a treatment: systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Background: Muslims experience the lowest recovery rate from mental health difficulties across all religious groups. The aim of this research is to understand the barriers that prevent Muslims from accessing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and the extent to which these may vary across country of residence.

Methods: Systematic review and thematic synthesis for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in English and Arabic informed by the SPIDER search tool. Methodological quality and risk of bias of included papers were critically appraised independently according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: A search of seven databases in the Arabic and English language yielded 3836 studies with 210 studies assessed for eligibility. Employing the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool resulted in 14 studies included in the thematic synthesis. Seven studies adopted a qualitative methodology employing semi-structured interviews and seven were quantitative descriptive studies.

Conclusions: Muslim communities experience barriers accessing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy at the level of the individual, culture, provider and management. The main barriers were experienced at the individual level which was dominated by the influence of Islam regarding the cause of mental health difficulties, which also influenced the way in which difficulties were managed.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO and registration number: CRD42020192854.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distribution and association of road traffic accident with depression among Indian population aged 45 years and above: nested multilevel modelling analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Unveiling the burden: prevalence and predictors of psychological distress among domestic workers in Kigali-Rwanda. Patterns and outcomes of individuals admitted at emergency units following intentional self-harm in Northern Uganda. Prevalence of substance use among a sample of patients attending an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Amman, Jordan. The role of emotion regulation strategies as the mediator between self-compassion and depression among undergraduates in Yunnan province, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1