对自动驾驶汽车接受度的看法:来自自组织地图和随机森林的信息挖掘

IF 3.2 Q3 TRANSPORTATION IATSS Research Pub Date : 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.11.002
Apostolos Ziakopoulos , Christina Telidou , Apostolos Anagnostopoulos , Fotini Kehagia , George Yannis
{"title":"对自动驾驶汽车接受度的看法:来自自组织地图和随机森林的信息挖掘","authors":"Apostolos Ziakopoulos ,&nbsp;Christina Telidou ,&nbsp;Apostolos Anagnostopoulos ,&nbsp;Fotini Kehagia ,&nbsp;George Yannis","doi":"10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present research investigates a range of factors affecting autonomous vehicle (AV) acceptance of Greek citizens through a questionnaire distributed to 563 respondents. Following the extraction of descriptive statistics, self-organizing maps (SOMs) were employed to meaningfully categorize and aggregate questions pertaining to four main pillars of the questionnaire, which are conceptually relevant namely: (i) how several factors affect general car choices of respondents, (ii) what the respondents perceived that AVs would offer, (iii) how much they agreed with stated expected technology and efficiency-oriented AV traits and (iv) how they believe several factors affect driving behavior overall. A Random Forest (RF) algorithm was applied to classify the AV acceptance decisions of a training subset of the respondents, and was subsequently assessed on a test subset. SOM results indicate that participants can be meaningfully separated into two SOM cluster groups for pillars (i), (ii) and (iv), while pillar (iii) yielded separations into three SOM cluster groups. RF feature importance calculation indicated a number of affecting variables; the five most contributing ones are: distance covering capabilities of AVs was a major factor affecting acceptance decisions, followed (by a wide margin) by responder opinions on whether the principles and conscience of drivers can be replaced by an AI navigator without reducing safety levels, while the algorithm itself conducted successful classification to about 80% of test cases. Present results can be used to anticipate AV penetration levels based on sample characteristics and to improve AV traits in cases where higher AV penetration is sought.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47059,"journal":{"name":"IATSS Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S038611122300047X/pdfft?md5=da47557f29b5fae70c820885b02bc03f&pid=1-s2.0-S038611122300047X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions towards autonomous vehicle acceptance: Information mining from Self-Organizing Maps and Random Forests\",\"authors\":\"Apostolos Ziakopoulos ,&nbsp;Christina Telidou ,&nbsp;Apostolos Anagnostopoulos ,&nbsp;Fotini Kehagia ,&nbsp;George Yannis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present research investigates a range of factors affecting autonomous vehicle (AV) acceptance of Greek citizens through a questionnaire distributed to 563 respondents. Following the extraction of descriptive statistics, self-organizing maps (SOMs) were employed to meaningfully categorize and aggregate questions pertaining to four main pillars of the questionnaire, which are conceptually relevant namely: (i) how several factors affect general car choices of respondents, (ii) what the respondents perceived that AVs would offer, (iii) how much they agreed with stated expected technology and efficiency-oriented AV traits and (iv) how they believe several factors affect driving behavior overall. A Random Forest (RF) algorithm was applied to classify the AV acceptance decisions of a training subset of the respondents, and was subsequently assessed on a test subset. SOM results indicate that participants can be meaningfully separated into two SOM cluster groups for pillars (i), (ii) and (iv), while pillar (iii) yielded separations into three SOM cluster groups. RF feature importance calculation indicated a number of affecting variables; the five most contributing ones are: distance covering capabilities of AVs was a major factor affecting acceptance decisions, followed (by a wide margin) by responder opinions on whether the principles and conscience of drivers can be replaced by an AI navigator without reducing safety levels, while the algorithm itself conducted successful classification to about 80% of test cases. Present results can be used to anticipate AV penetration levels based on sample characteristics and to improve AV traits in cases where higher AV penetration is sought.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IATSS Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S038611122300047X/pdfft?md5=da47557f29b5fae70c820885b02bc03f&pid=1-s2.0-S038611122300047X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IATSS Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S038611122300047X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IATSS Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S038611122300047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究调查了一系列影响自动驾驶汽车(AV)接受希腊公民通过调查问卷分发给563名受访者的因素。在提取描述性统计数据之后,采用自组织图(SOMs)对与问卷的四个主要支柱有关的问题进行有意义的分类和汇总,这些问题在概念上是相关的,即:(i)几个因素如何影响受访者的一般汽车选择,(ii)受访者认为自动驾驶汽车将提供什么,(iii)他们在多大程度上同意所述的预期技术和以效率为导向的自动驾驶汽车特征,以及(iv)他们如何认为几个因素影响整体驾驶行为。随机森林(RF)算法应用于对应答者的训练子集的AV接受决策进行分类,随后在测试子集上进行评估。SOM结果表明,对于支柱(i)、(ii)和(iv),参与者可以有意义地分为两个SOM集群组,而支柱(iii)产生了三个SOM集群组的分离。射频特征重要性计算表明了一些影响变量;贡献最大的五个问题是:自动驾驶汽车的覆盖距离能力是影响接受决策的主要因素,其次是受访者对人工智能导航仪能否在不降低安全水平的情况下取代驾驶员的原则和良心的意见(差距很大),而算法本身对大约80%的测试用例进行了成功分类。目前的结果可用于根据样本特征预测AV渗透水平,并在寻求更高AV渗透的情况下改善AV特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions towards autonomous vehicle acceptance: Information mining from Self-Organizing Maps and Random Forests

The present research investigates a range of factors affecting autonomous vehicle (AV) acceptance of Greek citizens through a questionnaire distributed to 563 respondents. Following the extraction of descriptive statistics, self-organizing maps (SOMs) were employed to meaningfully categorize and aggregate questions pertaining to four main pillars of the questionnaire, which are conceptually relevant namely: (i) how several factors affect general car choices of respondents, (ii) what the respondents perceived that AVs would offer, (iii) how much they agreed with stated expected technology and efficiency-oriented AV traits and (iv) how they believe several factors affect driving behavior overall. A Random Forest (RF) algorithm was applied to classify the AV acceptance decisions of a training subset of the respondents, and was subsequently assessed on a test subset. SOM results indicate that participants can be meaningfully separated into two SOM cluster groups for pillars (i), (ii) and (iv), while pillar (iii) yielded separations into three SOM cluster groups. RF feature importance calculation indicated a number of affecting variables; the five most contributing ones are: distance covering capabilities of AVs was a major factor affecting acceptance decisions, followed (by a wide margin) by responder opinions on whether the principles and conscience of drivers can be replaced by an AI navigator without reducing safety levels, while the algorithm itself conducted successful classification to about 80% of test cases. Present results can be used to anticipate AV penetration levels based on sample characteristics and to improve AV traits in cases where higher AV penetration is sought.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IATSS Research
IATSS Research TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: First published in 1977 as an international journal sponsored by the International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, IATSS Research has contributed to the dissemination of interdisciplinary wisdom on ideal mobility, particularly in Asia. IATSS Research is an international refereed journal providing a platform for the exchange of scientific findings on transportation and safety across a wide range of academic fields, with particular emphasis on the links between scientific findings and practice in society and cultural contexts. IATSS Research welcomes submission of original research articles and reviews that satisfy the following conditions: 1.Relevant to transportation and safety, and the multiple impacts of transportation systems on security, human health, and the environment. 2.Contains important policy and practical implications based on scientific evidence in the applicable academic field. In addition to welcoming general submissions, IATSS Research occasionally plans and publishes special feature sections and special issues composed of invited articles addressing specific topics.
期刊最新文献
Evolution in Japan's legal system for ensuring traffic safety Discomfort in pedestrian-electric scooter interactions during frontal approaches A comprehensive view of factors influencing child passenger safety in low- and middle-income countries Understanding the influence of environmental factors on driver speed: A structural equation modeling analysis Effect of luminance of head-up displays on recognition of visual objects on roads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1