学习数字的顺序是普遍的吗?证据来自八个国家和六种语言

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Cognitive Development Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101391
Lee Copping , Peter Tymms , Gabrijela Aleksić , Tiago Bartholo , Sarah J Howie , Mariane Campelo Koslinski , Christine Merrell , Maša Vidmar , Helen Wildy
{"title":"学习数字的顺序是普遍的吗?证据来自八个国家和六种语言","authors":"Lee Copping ,&nbsp;Peter Tymms ,&nbsp;Gabrijela Aleksić ,&nbsp;Tiago Bartholo ,&nbsp;Sarah J Howie ,&nbsp;Mariane Campelo Koslinski ,&nbsp;Christine Merrell ,&nbsp;Maša Vidmar ,&nbsp;Helen Wildy","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cramman et al. (2018) proposed that numerical symbol identification may constitute a universally predictive measure of early mathematical development. While a broad pathway to learning number symbols is unsurprising, lack of systematic variation in acquisition order relative to factors such as teaching, age, country, progression stage, is. This study evidences unidimensionality of measurement of the order of ability clusters of numbers, showing that variations are minor across eight countries and, importantly, six instructional languages. This invariance suggests early symbol identification could represent a universal measurement which could a) instructionally inform teaching and learning of classroom mathematics, b) work predictively as an educational research tool and c) offer a foundation for valid international comparisons of the mathematical development of children. Tentatively, this study suggests numerical symbol identification may be a universal measure to assess mathematical cognition in early years education that is unaffected by language of instruction, gender, time of assessment and country.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000965/pdfft?md5=5da52fdc0e8a8c06bf520202cdd54d03&pid=1-s2.0-S0885201423000965-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the order of learning numerals universal? Evidence from eight countries and six languages\",\"authors\":\"Lee Copping ,&nbsp;Peter Tymms ,&nbsp;Gabrijela Aleksić ,&nbsp;Tiago Bartholo ,&nbsp;Sarah J Howie ,&nbsp;Mariane Campelo Koslinski ,&nbsp;Christine Merrell ,&nbsp;Maša Vidmar ,&nbsp;Helen Wildy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogdev.2023.101391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cramman et al. (2018) proposed that numerical symbol identification may constitute a universally predictive measure of early mathematical development. While a broad pathway to learning number symbols is unsurprising, lack of systematic variation in acquisition order relative to factors such as teaching, age, country, progression stage, is. This study evidences unidimensionality of measurement of the order of ability clusters of numbers, showing that variations are minor across eight countries and, importantly, six instructional languages. This invariance suggests early symbol identification could represent a universal measurement which could a) instructionally inform teaching and learning of classroom mathematics, b) work predictively as an educational research tool and c) offer a foundation for valid international comparisons of the mathematical development of children. Tentatively, this study suggests numerical symbol identification may be a universal measure to assess mathematical cognition in early years education that is unaffected by language of instruction, gender, time of assessment and country.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000965/pdfft?md5=5da52fdc0e8a8c06bf520202cdd54d03&pid=1-s2.0-S0885201423000965-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000965\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Cramman等人(2018)提出,数字符号识别可能构成早期数学发展的普遍预测指标。虽然学习数字符号的广泛途径并不令人惊讶,但缺乏与教学、年龄、国家、进步阶段等因素相关的习得顺序的系统变化是令人惊讶的。这项研究证明了数字能力集群顺序测量的单维性,表明八个国家之间的差异很小,更重要的是,六种教学语言之间的差异很小。这种不变性表明,早期符号识别可以代表一种普遍的测量方法,它可以a)为课堂数学的教学提供指导,b)作为一种教育研究工具进行预测性工作,c)为儿童数学发展的有效国际比较提供基础。本研究初步表明,数字符号识别可能是评估早期教育数学认知的一种普遍措施,不受教学语言、性别、评估时间和国家的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the order of learning numerals universal? Evidence from eight countries and six languages

Cramman et al. (2018) proposed that numerical symbol identification may constitute a universally predictive measure of early mathematical development. While a broad pathway to learning number symbols is unsurprising, lack of systematic variation in acquisition order relative to factors such as teaching, age, country, progression stage, is. This study evidences unidimensionality of measurement of the order of ability clusters of numbers, showing that variations are minor across eight countries and, importantly, six instructional languages. This invariance suggests early symbol identification could represent a universal measurement which could a) instructionally inform teaching and learning of classroom mathematics, b) work predictively as an educational research tool and c) offer a foundation for valid international comparisons of the mathematical development of children. Tentatively, this study suggests numerical symbol identification may be a universal measure to assess mathematical cognition in early years education that is unaffected by language of instruction, gender, time of assessment and country.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
期刊最新文献
From spontaneous focusing on numerosity to mathematics achievement: The mediating role of non-symbolic number processing and mapping between symbolic and non-symbolic representations of number Preschoolers prioritize humans over robots less than adults do: An eye-tracking study Sociolinguistic development in a diverse, multilinguistic environment: Evidence from multilingual children in Gujarat, India Attentional skills, developmental areas, and phonological awareness in children aged 5–6 years Attending to talker characteristics: Word learning and recognition in monolingually- and multilingually-raised infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1