国际安全标志的理解:未来技术工人语境

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103523
Ardiyanto Ardiyanto , Luthfia Aurensa Saraswati , Fanny Rahmatika , Ardian Rahman Afandi , Fitri Trapsilawati
{"title":"国际安全标志的理解:未来技术工人语境","authors":"Ardiyanto Ardiyanto ,&nbsp;Luthfia Aurensa Saraswati ,&nbsp;Fanny Rahmatika ,&nbsp;Ardian Rahman Afandi ,&nbsp;Fitri Trapsilawati","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An effective method for educating workers about occupational hazards is the use of safety signs in the workplace. However, workers' understanding may vary due to factors such as cultural background, familiarity, and training. This study aimed to assess the comprehension of international safety signs among participants representing the prospective technical workforce in Indonesian<span> industries. Two groups of participants (n = 71), comprising vocational high school students and college-level engineering students, were involved to assess their comprehension of symbol elements, comprehension of complete signs, compliance intention, and familiarity towards a selected set of international safety signs. The study revealed that the complete signs significantly increased the comprehension and compliance intention of the prospective technical workers regarding the selected signs (p &lt; .001). However, most safety signs under the fire equipment and safe condition categories investigated in the study had low comprehension and compliance intention scores (&lt;67%). Conversely, signs under the mandatory and warning categories generally exhibited better comprehension and compliance intention scores. Additionally, participants in the study were generally not familiar with the investigated signs (&lt;50%). The familiarity with the signs was strongly correlated with the comprehension and compliance intention of the participants (p &lt; .001).</span></p></div><div><h3>Relevance to industry</h3><p>Understanding the findings, which revealed that the comprehension, compliance intention, and familiarity of the prospective technical worker participants with some international safety signs generally did not meet the standards, interventions such as training and redesigning the safety signs are highly recommended to minimize future adverse safety outcomes when they enter the workforce.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehension of international safety signs: A prospective technical workers context\",\"authors\":\"Ardiyanto Ardiyanto ,&nbsp;Luthfia Aurensa Saraswati ,&nbsp;Fanny Rahmatika ,&nbsp;Ardian Rahman Afandi ,&nbsp;Fitri Trapsilawati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An effective method for educating workers about occupational hazards is the use of safety signs in the workplace. However, workers' understanding may vary due to factors such as cultural background, familiarity, and training. This study aimed to assess the comprehension of international safety signs among participants representing the prospective technical workforce in Indonesian<span> industries. Two groups of participants (n = 71), comprising vocational high school students and college-level engineering students, were involved to assess their comprehension of symbol elements, comprehension of complete signs, compliance intention, and familiarity towards a selected set of international safety signs. The study revealed that the complete signs significantly increased the comprehension and compliance intention of the prospective technical workers regarding the selected signs (p &lt; .001). However, most safety signs under the fire equipment and safe condition categories investigated in the study had low comprehension and compliance intention scores (&lt;67%). Conversely, signs under the mandatory and warning categories generally exhibited better comprehension and compliance intention scores. Additionally, participants in the study were generally not familiar with the investigated signs (&lt;50%). The familiarity with the signs was strongly correlated with the comprehension and compliance intention of the participants (p &lt; .001).</span></p></div><div><h3>Relevance to industry</h3><p>Understanding the findings, which revealed that the comprehension, compliance intention, and familiarity of the prospective technical worker participants with some international safety signs generally did not meet the standards, interventions such as training and redesigning the safety signs are highly recommended to minimize future adverse safety outcomes when they enter the workforce.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814123001154\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814123001154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对工人进行职业危害教育的有效方法是在工作场所使用安全标志。然而,由于文化背景、熟悉程度和培训等因素,员工的理解可能会有所不同。本研究旨在评估国际安全标志的理解在参与者中代表未来的技术劳动力在印度尼西亚的工业。两组参与者(n = 71),包括职业高中学生和大学水平的工科学生,参与评估他们对符号元素的理解,对完整标志的理解,依从性意图和对选定的一组国际安全标志的熟悉程度。研究发现,完整的标志显著增加了未来技术工人对所选标志的理解和依从意愿(p <措施)。然而,研究调查的消防设备和安全状况类别下的大多数安全标志的理解和依从性意愿得分较低(67%)。相反,强制性和警告类别下的标志通常表现出更好的理解和遵守意愿得分。此外,研究中的参与者通常不熟悉所调查的体征(<50%)。对标志的熟悉程度与被试的理解意向和依从意向呈显著正相关(p <措施)。了解研究结果,发现未来的技术工人参与者对一些国际安全标志的理解、遵从意图和熟悉程度通常不符合标准,强烈建议进行干预,如培训和重新设计安全标志,以尽量减少未来进入劳动力市场时的不良安全后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehension of international safety signs: A prospective technical workers context

An effective method for educating workers about occupational hazards is the use of safety signs in the workplace. However, workers' understanding may vary due to factors such as cultural background, familiarity, and training. This study aimed to assess the comprehension of international safety signs among participants representing the prospective technical workforce in Indonesian industries. Two groups of participants (n = 71), comprising vocational high school students and college-level engineering students, were involved to assess their comprehension of symbol elements, comprehension of complete signs, compliance intention, and familiarity towards a selected set of international safety signs. The study revealed that the complete signs significantly increased the comprehension and compliance intention of the prospective technical workers regarding the selected signs (p < .001). However, most safety signs under the fire equipment and safe condition categories investigated in the study had low comprehension and compliance intention scores (<67%). Conversely, signs under the mandatory and warning categories generally exhibited better comprehension and compliance intention scores. Additionally, participants in the study were generally not familiar with the investigated signs (<50%). The familiarity with the signs was strongly correlated with the comprehension and compliance intention of the participants (p < .001).

Relevance to industry

Understanding the findings, which revealed that the comprehension, compliance intention, and familiarity of the prospective technical worker participants with some international safety signs generally did not meet the standards, interventions such as training and redesigning the safety signs are highly recommended to minimize future adverse safety outcomes when they enter the workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the link between occupational risk factors, work-related musculoskeletal disorders and quality of work life: An analysis using PLS-SEM Ergonomic design of mastectomy bra based on emotion measurements Sedentary behavior and musculoskeletal symptoms among work from home employees Research on similarity bias in dual objective visual search based on nuclear power human-machine interface icons The impact of camera-monitor system viewing angles on drivers’ distance perception: A simulated driving study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1