为应对东部和南部非洲卫生挑战而采取部门间行动的需求及其评价方法

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2023.09.001
Francesco Ramponi PhD , Aloysius Ssennyonjo MSc , Stephen Banda MSc , Tom Aliti PhD , Dominic Nkhoma PhD , Oliver Kaonga PhD , Susan Griffin PhD , Paul Revill MSc , Edward Kataika MA , Juliet Nabyonga-Orem PhD
{"title":"为应对东部和南部非洲卫生挑战而采取部门间行动的需求及其评价方法","authors":"Francesco Ramponi PhD ,&nbsp;Aloysius Ssennyonjo MSc ,&nbsp;Stephen Banda MSc ,&nbsp;Tom Aliti PhD ,&nbsp;Dominic Nkhoma PhD ,&nbsp;Oliver Kaonga PhD ,&nbsp;Susan Griffin PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Revill MSc ,&nbsp;Edward Kataika MA ,&nbsp;Juliet Nabyonga-Orem PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Focusing on the East, Central, and Southern African region, this study examines both regional and country-level initiatives aimed at promoting multisectoral collaboration to improve population health and the methods for their economic evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We explored the interventions that necessitate cooperation among policymakers from diverse sectors and the mechanisms that facilitate effective collaboration and coordination across these sectors. To gain insights into the demand for multisectoral collaboration in the East, Central, and Southern African region, we presented 3 country briefs, highlighting policy areas and initiatives that have successfully incorporated health-promoting actions from outside the health sector in Zimbabwe, Uganda, and Malawi. Additionally, we showcased initiatives undertaken by the Ministry of Health in each country to foster coordination with national and international stakeholders, along with existing coordination mechanisms established for intersectoral collaboration. Drawing on these examples, we identified the primary challenges in the economic evaluation of multisectoral programs aimed at improving health in the region.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We illustrated how decision making in reality differs from the traditional single-sector and single-decision-maker perspective commonly used in cost-effectiveness analyses. To ensure economic evaluations can inform decision making in diverse settings and facilitate regional collaboration, we highlighted 3 fundamental principles: identifying policy objectives, defining the perspective of the analysis, and considering opportunity costs. We emphasized the importance of adopting a flexible and context-specific approach to economic evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Through this work, we contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice in the context of intersectoral activities aimed at improving health outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000870/pdfft?md5=ebc240833e7b3e50a02a2c2a55eaf084&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109923000870-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demands for Intersectoral Actions to Meet Health Challenges in East and Southern Africa and Methods for Their Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Ramponi PhD ,&nbsp;Aloysius Ssennyonjo MSc ,&nbsp;Stephen Banda MSc ,&nbsp;Tom Aliti PhD ,&nbsp;Dominic Nkhoma PhD ,&nbsp;Oliver Kaonga PhD ,&nbsp;Susan Griffin PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Revill MSc ,&nbsp;Edward Kataika MA ,&nbsp;Juliet Nabyonga-Orem PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Focusing on the East, Central, and Southern African region, this study examines both regional and country-level initiatives aimed at promoting multisectoral collaboration to improve population health and the methods for their economic evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We explored the interventions that necessitate cooperation among policymakers from diverse sectors and the mechanisms that facilitate effective collaboration and coordination across these sectors. To gain insights into the demand for multisectoral collaboration in the East, Central, and Southern African region, we presented 3 country briefs, highlighting policy areas and initiatives that have successfully incorporated health-promoting actions from outside the health sector in Zimbabwe, Uganda, and Malawi. Additionally, we showcased initiatives undertaken by the Ministry of Health in each country to foster coordination with national and international stakeholders, along with existing coordination mechanisms established for intersectoral collaboration. Drawing on these examples, we identified the primary challenges in the economic evaluation of multisectoral programs aimed at improving health in the region.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We illustrated how decision making in reality differs from the traditional single-sector and single-decision-maker perspective commonly used in cost-effectiveness analyses. To ensure economic evaluations can inform decision making in diverse settings and facilitate regional collaboration, we highlighted 3 fundamental principles: identifying policy objectives, defining the perspective of the analysis, and considering opportunity costs. We emphasized the importance of adopting a flexible and context-specific approach to economic evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Through this work, we contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice in the context of intersectoral activities aimed at improving health outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000870/pdfft?md5=ebc240833e7b3e50a02a2c2a55eaf084&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109923000870-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923000870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究以东部、中部和南部非洲地区为重点,审查了旨在促进多部门合作以改善人口健康的区域和国家一级举措及其经济评估方法。方法:我们探讨了需要不同部门决策者之间合作的干预措施,以及促进这些部门之间有效合作和协调的机制。为了深入了解东非、中非和南部非洲区域对多部门合作的需求,我们提出了3个国家简报,重点介绍了津巴布韦、乌干达和马拉维卫生部门以外已成功纳入健康促进行动的政策领域和举措。此外,我们还展示了各国卫生部为促进与国家和国际利益攸关方的协调而采取的举措,以及为部门间协作建立的现有协调机制。根据这些例子,我们确定了旨在改善该地区健康状况的多部门项目的经济评估面临的主要挑战。结果我们说明了现实中的决策与成本效益分析中常用的传统单一部门和单一决策者的观点有何不同。为了确保经济评估能够为不同环境下的决策提供信息,并促进区域合作,我们强调了3个基本原则:确定政策目标,定义分析视角,考虑机会成本。我们强调对经济评价采取灵活和具体情况的办法的重要性。通过这项工作,我们有助于在旨在改善健康结果的部门间活动中弥合理论与实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demands for Intersectoral Actions to Meet Health Challenges in East and Southern Africa and Methods for Their Evaluation

Objectives

Focusing on the East, Central, and Southern African region, this study examines both regional and country-level initiatives aimed at promoting multisectoral collaboration to improve population health and the methods for their economic evaluation.

Methods

We explored the interventions that necessitate cooperation among policymakers from diverse sectors and the mechanisms that facilitate effective collaboration and coordination across these sectors. To gain insights into the demand for multisectoral collaboration in the East, Central, and Southern African region, we presented 3 country briefs, highlighting policy areas and initiatives that have successfully incorporated health-promoting actions from outside the health sector in Zimbabwe, Uganda, and Malawi. Additionally, we showcased initiatives undertaken by the Ministry of Health in each country to foster coordination with national and international stakeholders, along with existing coordination mechanisms established for intersectoral collaboration. Drawing on these examples, we identified the primary challenges in the economic evaluation of multisectoral programs aimed at improving health in the region.

Results

We illustrated how decision making in reality differs from the traditional single-sector and single-decision-maker perspective commonly used in cost-effectiveness analyses. To ensure economic evaluations can inform decision making in diverse settings and facilitate regional collaboration, we highlighted 3 fundamental principles: identifying policy objectives, defining the perspective of the analysis, and considering opportunity costs. We emphasized the importance of adopting a flexible and context-specific approach to economic evaluation.

Conclusions

Through this work, we contribute to bridging the gap between theory and practice in the context of intersectoral activities aimed at improving health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Understanding What Matters: Stakeholder Views on Decision Criteria for Cancer Drug Selection in the Public Sector in Malaysia. Postpartum Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Singapore Cost-Utility Analysis of Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Comparison With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in the Treatment of Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Iran. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1