腹腔镜辅助阴囊入路治疗腹股沟隐睾伴阴道突未闭的临床疗效分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1089/lap.2023.0361
Chengpin Tao, Yongsheng Cao, Xiang Liu, Changkun Mao
{"title":"腹腔镜辅助阴囊入路治疗腹股沟隐睾伴阴道突未闭的临床疗效分析。","authors":"Chengpin Tao, Yongsheng Cao, Xiang Liu, Changkun Mao","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of two surgical approaches, laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision and conventional inguinal-scrotal incision, for treating cryptorchidism with unobliterated processus vaginalis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Clinical data from 60 pediatric patients with inguinal cryptorchidism who were admitted to our institution between January 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Depending on the surgical technique used, the patients were split into two groups: the laparoscopic group (<i>n</i> = 30) underwent a laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision, whereas the conventional group (<i>n</i> = 30) underwent a conventional inguinal-scrotal incision for testicular descent and fixation. The length of the procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and the typical hospital stay following the procedure were compared between the two groups. Also assessed was the frequency of postoperative complications including wound infection and hematoma development. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The laparoscopic group demonstrated a notably shortened average surgical duration compared with the traditional group, and this discrepancy held statistical significance (<i>P</i> = .017). Moreover, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a reduced volume of intraoperative blood loss, with a statistically significant distinction (<i>P</i> = .002), along with a decreased average length of hospital stay after surgery, also statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .009). Testicular retraction, atrophy, inguinal hernias, or hydrocele were not present in any group. Although the difference between the laparoscopic and open groups was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05), the laparoscopic group saw a reduced frequency of scrotal hematoma. The frequency of wound infection was also decreased in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group, although there was no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision approach for testicular descent and fixation offers precise localization of cryptorchidism, reduced surgical trauma, shorter postoperative recovery time, and results in smaller scars with minimal tissue damage. The procedure showcases enhanced overall clinical effectiveness, fewer postoperative complications, heightened safety, and superior cosmetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"664-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic-Assisted Scrotal Approach for the Treatment of Inguinal Cryptorchidism with Patent Processus Vaginalis: Clinical Efficacy Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chengpin Tao, Yongsheng Cao, Xiang Liu, Changkun Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2023.0361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of two surgical approaches, laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision and conventional inguinal-scrotal incision, for treating cryptorchidism with unobliterated processus vaginalis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Clinical data from 60 pediatric patients with inguinal cryptorchidism who were admitted to our institution between January 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Depending on the surgical technique used, the patients were split into two groups: the laparoscopic group (<i>n</i> = 30) underwent a laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision, whereas the conventional group (<i>n</i> = 30) underwent a conventional inguinal-scrotal incision for testicular descent and fixation. The length of the procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and the typical hospital stay following the procedure were compared between the two groups. Also assessed was the frequency of postoperative complications including wound infection and hematoma development. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The laparoscopic group demonstrated a notably shortened average surgical duration compared with the traditional group, and this discrepancy held statistical significance (<i>P</i> = .017). Moreover, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a reduced volume of intraoperative blood loss, with a statistically significant distinction (<i>P</i> = .002), along with a decreased average length of hospital stay after surgery, also statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .009). Testicular retraction, atrophy, inguinal hernias, or hydrocele were not present in any group. Although the difference between the laparoscopic and open groups was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05), the laparoscopic group saw a reduced frequency of scrotal hematoma. The frequency of wound infection was also decreased in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group, although there was no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision approach for testicular descent and fixation offers precise localization of cryptorchidism, reduced surgical trauma, shorter postoperative recovery time, and results in smaller scars with minimal tissue damage. The procedure showcases enhanced overall clinical effectiveness, fewer postoperative complications, heightened safety, and superior cosmetic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"664-669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0361\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2023.0361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较腹腔镜下阴囊切开与常规腹股沟-阴囊切开两种手术方式治疗隐睾伴阴道突未消隐的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院2018年1月至2022年1月收治的60例小儿腹股沟隐睾患者的临床资料。根据所使用的手术技术,将患者分为两组:腹腔镜组(n = 30)采用腹腔镜辅助阴囊切口,而常规组(n = 30)采用常规腹股沟-阴囊切口进行睾丸下降和固定。比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量和手术后的典型住院时间。还评估了术后并发症的频率,包括伤口感染和血肿的发展。结果:腹腔镜组比传统组平均手术时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.017)。此外,腹腔镜入路术中出血量减少,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002),术后平均住院时间缩短,差异也有统计学意义(P = 0.009)。任何组均未出现睾丸缩回、萎缩、腹股沟疝或鞘膜积液。虽然腹腔镜组与开放组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但腹腔镜组阴囊血肿发生率明显降低。与开放组相比,腹腔镜组伤口感染发生率也有所降低,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助下阴囊切口入路睾丸下降固定能精确定位隐睾,手术创伤小,术后恢复时间短,瘢痕小,组织损伤小。该手术显示了增强的整体临床效果,更少的术后并发症,更高的安全性和更好的美容效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laparoscopic-Assisted Scrotal Approach for the Treatment of Inguinal Cryptorchidism with Patent Processus Vaginalis: Clinical Efficacy Analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of two surgical approaches, laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision and conventional inguinal-scrotal incision, for treating cryptorchidism with unobliterated processus vaginalis. Methods: Clinical data from 60 pediatric patients with inguinal cryptorchidism who were admitted to our institution between January 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Depending on the surgical technique used, the patients were split into two groups: the laparoscopic group (n = 30) underwent a laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision, whereas the conventional group (n = 30) underwent a conventional inguinal-scrotal incision for testicular descent and fixation. The length of the procedure, intraoperative blood loss, and the typical hospital stay following the procedure were compared between the two groups. Also assessed was the frequency of postoperative complications including wound infection and hematoma development. Results: The laparoscopic group demonstrated a notably shortened average surgical duration compared with the traditional group, and this discrepancy held statistical significance (P = .017). Moreover, the laparoscopic approach resulted in a reduced volume of intraoperative blood loss, with a statistically significant distinction (P = .002), along with a decreased average length of hospital stay after surgery, also statistically significant (P = .009). Testicular retraction, atrophy, inguinal hernias, or hydrocele were not present in any group. Although the difference between the laparoscopic and open groups was not statistically significant (P > .05), the laparoscopic group saw a reduced frequency of scrotal hematoma. The frequency of wound infection was also decreased in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group, although there was no statistically significant difference (P > .05). Conclusion: The laparoscopic-assisted scrotal incision approach for testicular descent and fixation offers precise localization of cryptorchidism, reduced surgical trauma, shorter postoperative recovery time, and results in smaller scars with minimal tissue damage. The procedure showcases enhanced overall clinical effectiveness, fewer postoperative complications, heightened safety, and superior cosmetic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Cystic Duct Ligation Techniques in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Analysis of 73 Cases of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Patient Selection is Key. Application of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Pringle Maneuver: A Comparative Study with the Pringle Maneuver. Short-Term Efficacy of LCBDE+LC Versus ERCP/EST+LC in the Treatment of Cholelithiasis Combined with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1