儿科急诊科腹痛患者镇痛药的性别差异

Marie E. Vastola , Bryn E. Mumma , Jeffrey R. Fine , Daniel J. Tancredi , Joshua W. Elder , Angela F. Jarman
{"title":"儿科急诊科腹痛患者镇痛药的性别差异","authors":"Marie E. Vastola ,&nbsp;Bryn E. Mumma ,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Fine ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Tancredi ,&nbsp;Joshua W. Elder ,&nbsp;Angela F. Jarman","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2023.100062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is conflicting data about sex-based differences in the treatment of acute pain in the ED. Little is known about sex-based disparities in analgesia in pediatric ED patients.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our objective was to determine whether analgesic administration rates differ between female and male pediatric patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED patients 5–21 years old with abdominal pain between 6/1/19 and 6/30/21. The primary outcome was receipt of any analgesia, and secondary outcomes were receipt of opioid analgesia and time to receipt of analgesia. Multivariable regression models were fitted for each outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We studied 1087 patients; 681 (63%) were female with a median age of 17 years (IQR 13, 19) and 406 (37%) were male with a median age of 14 years (IQR 9, 18). 371 female patients (55%) and 180 male patients (44%) received any analgesia. 132 female patients (19%) and 83 male patients (20%) received opioid analgesia. In multivariate analyses, female patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97–1.74, p ​= ​0.07), but time to analgesia was 14% longer (GMR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.29, p ​= ​0.04). Non-White patients were 32% less likely to receive opioids (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.97, p ​= ​0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Female pediatric ED patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia as male patients, but their time to analgesia was longer. Non-White patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia than White patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000585/pdfft?md5=aa8735fb0f9497e52c0656b3f7c4399c&pid=1-s2.0-S2773232023000585-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesia administration by sex among pediatric emergency department patients with abdominal pain\",\"authors\":\"Marie E. Vastola ,&nbsp;Bryn E. Mumma ,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Fine ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Tancredi ,&nbsp;Joshua W. Elder ,&nbsp;Angela F. Jarman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2023.100062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is conflicting data about sex-based differences in the treatment of acute pain in the ED. Little is known about sex-based disparities in analgesia in pediatric ED patients.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our objective was to determine whether analgesic administration rates differ between female and male pediatric patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED patients 5–21 years old with abdominal pain between 6/1/19 and 6/30/21. The primary outcome was receipt of any analgesia, and secondary outcomes were receipt of opioid analgesia and time to receipt of analgesia. Multivariable regression models were fitted for each outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We studied 1087 patients; 681 (63%) were female with a median age of 17 years (IQR 13, 19) and 406 (37%) were male with a median age of 14 years (IQR 9, 18). 371 female patients (55%) and 180 male patients (44%) received any analgesia. 132 female patients (19%) and 83 male patients (20%) received opioid analgesia. In multivariate analyses, female patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97–1.74, p ​= ​0.07), but time to analgesia was 14% longer (GMR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.29, p ​= ​0.04). Non-White patients were 32% less likely to receive opioids (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.97, p ​= ​0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Female pediatric ED patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia as male patients, but their time to analgesia was longer. Non-White patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia than White patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JEM reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000585/pdfft?md5=aa8735fb0f9497e52c0656b3f7c4399c&pid=1-s2.0-S2773232023000585-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JEM reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232023000585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于急诊科急性疼痛治疗的性别差异存在矛盾的数据。关于儿科急诊科患者镇痛的性别差异知之甚少。目的:我们的目的是确定以腹痛就诊的儿科女性和男性患者的镇痛给药率是否存在差异。方法对19年6月1日至21年6月30日期间伴有腹痛的5-21岁ED患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要结局是接受任何镇痛,次要结局是接受阿片类镇痛和接受镇痛的时间。对每个结果拟合多变量回归模型。结果共纳入1087例患者;681例(63%)为女性,中位年龄为17岁(IQR 13,19), 406例(37%)为男性,中位年龄为14岁(IQR 9,18)。女性371例(55%),男性180例(44%)。女性132例(19%),男性83例(20%)。在多变量分析中,女性患者同样可能接受任何镇痛(OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97-1.74, p = 0.07),但镇痛时间长14% (GMR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29, p = 0.04)。非白人患者接受阿片类药物治疗的可能性降低32% (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97, p = 0.04)。结论小儿急诊科女性患者接受镇痛的可能性与男性患者相同,但她们接受镇痛的时间更长。非白人患者接受阿片类镇痛的可能性低于白人患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analgesia administration by sex among pediatric emergency department patients with abdominal pain

Background

There is conflicting data about sex-based differences in the treatment of acute pain in the ED. Little is known about sex-based disparities in analgesia in pediatric ED patients.

Objectives

Our objective was to determine whether analgesic administration rates differ between female and male pediatric patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED patients 5–21 years old with abdominal pain between 6/1/19 and 6/30/21. The primary outcome was receipt of any analgesia, and secondary outcomes were receipt of opioid analgesia and time to receipt of analgesia. Multivariable regression models were fitted for each outcome.

Results

We studied 1087 patients; 681 (63%) were female with a median age of 17 years (IQR 13, 19) and 406 (37%) were male with a median age of 14 years (IQR 9, 18). 371 female patients (55%) and 180 male patients (44%) received any analgesia. 132 female patients (19%) and 83 male patients (20%) received opioid analgesia. In multivariate analyses, female patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97–1.74, p ​= ​0.07), but time to analgesia was 14% longer (GMR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00–1.29, p ​= ​0.04). Non-White patients were 32% less likely to receive opioids (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.97, p ​= ​0.04).

Conclusions

Female pediatric ED patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia as male patients, but their time to analgesia was longer. Non-White patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia than White patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blocks for acute knee pain in the emergency department: A case series The presentation and diagnostic utility of xanthochromia in current practice Erratum regarding previously published articles Erratum regarding previously published articles Lactate gap - A clinical tool for diagnosing and managing ethylene glycol poisoning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1