Margareta A. Clarke, Rachael Cheek, Habeeb F. Kazimuddin, Bryan Hernandez, Reece Clarke, Colin D. McKnight, Joy Derwenskus, James Eaton, Rebecca Irlmeier, Fei Ye, Kristin P. O'Grady, Baxter Rogers, Seth A. Smith, Francesca Bagnato
{"title":"顺磁边缘病变和中心静脉征象:多发性硬化症影像学标志的特征。","authors":"Margareta A. Clarke, Rachael Cheek, Habeeb F. Kazimuddin, Bryan Hernandez, Reece Clarke, Colin D. McKnight, Joy Derwenskus, James Eaton, Rebecca Irlmeier, Fei Ye, Kristin P. O'Grady, Baxter Rogers, Seth A. Smith, Francesca Bagnato","doi":"10.1111/jon.13173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Paramagnetic rims and the central vein sign (CVS) are proposed imaging markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Using 7 tesla magnetic resonance imaging, we aimed to: (1) characterize the appearance of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs); (2) assess whether PRLs and the CVS are associated with higher levels of MS pathology; and (3) compare the characteristics between subjects with and without PRLs in early MS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective study of 32 treatment-naïve subjects around the time of diagnosis who were assessed for the presence of PRLs and the CVS. Comparisons of lesion volume and macromolecular pool size ratio (PSR) index, a proxy of myelin integrity, between PRLs and non-PRLs, and CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions were carried out. Differences in clinical/demographic characteristics between patients with PRLs and those without were tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen subjects had ≥1 PRL for a total of 36 PRLs, of which two-thirds had a full rim. PRLs predicted a larger lesion size and decreased PSR signal. Lesion volume and presence of cervical spine lesions were significantly different between subjects with PRLs and those without, although neither remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. One hundred and eighty-one lesions with CVS were identified with no differences between CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions in volume (<i>p</i> = .27) and PSR values (<i>p</i> = .62).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PRLs, but not CVS-positive lesions, are larger and have lower myelin integrity. Our findings indicate that PRLs are associated with higher levels of lesion-specific pathology prior to the start of disease-modifying therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"34 1","pages":"86-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.13173","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paramagnetic rim lesions and the central vein sign: Characterizing multiple sclerosis imaging markers\",\"authors\":\"Margareta A. Clarke, Rachael Cheek, Habeeb F. Kazimuddin, Bryan Hernandez, Reece Clarke, Colin D. McKnight, Joy Derwenskus, James Eaton, Rebecca Irlmeier, Fei Ye, Kristin P. O'Grady, Baxter Rogers, Seth A. Smith, Francesca Bagnato\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.13173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Paramagnetic rims and the central vein sign (CVS) are proposed imaging markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Using 7 tesla magnetic resonance imaging, we aimed to: (1) characterize the appearance of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs); (2) assess whether PRLs and the CVS are associated with higher levels of MS pathology; and (3) compare the characteristics between subjects with and without PRLs in early MS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective study of 32 treatment-naïve subjects around the time of diagnosis who were assessed for the presence of PRLs and the CVS. Comparisons of lesion volume and macromolecular pool size ratio (PSR) index, a proxy of myelin integrity, between PRLs and non-PRLs, and CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions were carried out. Differences in clinical/demographic characteristics between patients with PRLs and those without were tested.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifteen subjects had ≥1 PRL for a total of 36 PRLs, of which two-thirds had a full rim. PRLs predicted a larger lesion size and decreased PSR signal. Lesion volume and presence of cervical spine lesions were significantly different between subjects with PRLs and those without, although neither remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. One hundred and eighty-one lesions with CVS were identified with no differences between CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions in volume (<i>p</i> = .27) and PSR values (<i>p</i> = .62).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>PRLs, but not CVS-positive lesions, are larger and have lower myelin integrity. Our findings indicate that PRLs are associated with higher levels of lesion-specific pathology prior to the start of disease-modifying therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"86-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.13173\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.13173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paramagnetic rim lesions and the central vein sign: Characterizing multiple sclerosis imaging markers
Background and Purpose
Paramagnetic rims and the central vein sign (CVS) are proposed imaging markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Using 7 tesla magnetic resonance imaging, we aimed to: (1) characterize the appearance of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs); (2) assess whether PRLs and the CVS are associated with higher levels of MS pathology; and (3) compare the characteristics between subjects with and without PRLs in early MS.
Methods
Prospective study of 32 treatment-naïve subjects around the time of diagnosis who were assessed for the presence of PRLs and the CVS. Comparisons of lesion volume and macromolecular pool size ratio (PSR) index, a proxy of myelin integrity, between PRLs and non-PRLs, and CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions were carried out. Differences in clinical/demographic characteristics between patients with PRLs and those without were tested.
Results
Fifteen subjects had ≥1 PRL for a total of 36 PRLs, of which two-thirds had a full rim. PRLs predicted a larger lesion size and decreased PSR signal. Lesion volume and presence of cervical spine lesions were significantly different between subjects with PRLs and those without, although neither remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. One hundred and eighty-one lesions with CVS were identified with no differences between CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions in volume (p = .27) and PSR values (p = .62).
Conclusions
PRLs, but not CVS-positive lesions, are larger and have lower myelin integrity. Our findings indicate that PRLs are associated with higher levels of lesion-specific pathology prior to the start of disease-modifying therapy.
期刊介绍:
Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on:
MRI
CT
Carotid Ultrasound and TCD
SPECT
PET
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology
Functional MRI
Xenon CT
and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!