斯里兰卡健康饮食的财政政策和法规:对含糖饮料的税收和交通灯标签的政治经济分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Action Pub Date : 2023-12-31 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339
Sunimalee Madurawala, Kimuthu Kiringoda, Anne Marie Thow, Nisha Arunatilake
{"title":"斯里兰卡健康饮食的财政政策和法规:对含糖饮料的税收和交通灯标签的政治经济分析。","authors":"Sunimalee Madurawala, Kimuthu Kiringoda, Anne Marie Thow, Nisha Arunatilake","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy dietary patterns significantly contribute to rising non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Sri Lanka. The government has implemented policy measures to promote healthy dietary patterns, including the traffic light labelling (TLL) system for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in 2016 and taxation on SSBs in 2017.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse how ideas, institutions, and power dynamics influence the formulation and implementation of these two interventions, and to identify strategies for public health actors to advocate for more effective food environment policies in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study drew on Kingdon's theory of agenda-setting and Campbell's institutionalist approach to develop the theoretical framework. We examined the political economy at the policy development and implementation stages, adopting a deductive framework approach for data collection and analysis. Data were collected from documents and key informants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NCDs and nutrition are recognised and framed as important policy issues in health-sector policy documents, and the SSB tax and TLL system are seen as means of improving diets and health. Sri Lanka's commitment to addressing NCDs and nutrition-related issues is evident through these policies. The Ministry of Health led policy development, and key stakeholders were involved. However, there are opportunities to learn and strengthen policy in Sri Lanka and elsewhere. Limited involvement and commitment of some stakeholders in developing national policies, industry interferences, and other gaps resulted in weaker policy design. Gender considerations were also given minimal attention in policy formulation and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To enhance the effectiveness of the policies and regulations to promote healthy diets in Sri Lanka, comprehensive policy coverage, multistakeholder involvement and commitment to national policies, balanced power dynamics, technical feasibility, government commitment backed with high-level political support, awareness, and knowledge creation, managing industry interferences, integrating gender considerations are crucial factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal policies and regulations for healthy diets in Sri Lanka: an analysis of the political economy of taxation and traffic light labelling for sugar-sweetened beverages.\",\"authors\":\"Sunimalee Madurawala, Kimuthu Kiringoda, Anne Marie Thow, Nisha Arunatilake\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy dietary patterns significantly contribute to rising non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Sri Lanka. The government has implemented policy measures to promote healthy dietary patterns, including the traffic light labelling (TLL) system for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in 2016 and taxation on SSBs in 2017.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyse how ideas, institutions, and power dynamics influence the formulation and implementation of these two interventions, and to identify strategies for public health actors to advocate for more effective food environment policies in Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study drew on Kingdon's theory of agenda-setting and Campbell's institutionalist approach to develop the theoretical framework. We examined the political economy at the policy development and implementation stages, adopting a deductive framework approach for data collection and analysis. Data were collected from documents and key informants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NCDs and nutrition are recognised and framed as important policy issues in health-sector policy documents, and the SSB tax and TLL system are seen as means of improving diets and health. Sri Lanka's commitment to addressing NCDs and nutrition-related issues is evident through these policies. The Ministry of Health led policy development, and key stakeholders were involved. However, there are opportunities to learn and strengthen policy in Sri Lanka and elsewhere. Limited involvement and commitment of some stakeholders in developing national policies, industry interferences, and other gaps resulted in weaker policy design. Gender considerations were also given minimal attention in policy formulation and implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To enhance the effectiveness of the policies and regulations to promote healthy diets in Sri Lanka, comprehensive policy coverage, multistakeholder involvement and commitment to national policies, balanced power dynamics, technical feasibility, government commitment backed with high-level political support, awareness, and knowledge creation, managing industry interferences, integrating gender considerations are crucial factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2280339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不健康的饮食模式在很大程度上导致了斯里兰卡非传染性疾病(NCDs)的上升。政府已经实施了促进健康饮食模式的政策措施,包括2016年对含糖饮料(ssb)实行红绿灯标签制度,以及2017年对含糖饮料征税。目标:分析思想、制度和权力动态如何影响这两项干预措施的制定和实施,并确定公共卫生行为体在斯里兰卡倡导更有效的粮食环境政策的战略。方法:本研究借鉴金登的议程设置理论和坎贝尔的制度主义研究方法,构建议程设置的理论框架。我们研究了政策制定和实施阶段的政治经济学,采用演绎框架方法进行数据收集和分析。数据是从文件和主要举报人那里收集的。结果:在卫生部门的政策文件中,非传染性疾病和营养被认为是重要的政策问题,SSB税和TLL系统被视为改善饮食和健康的手段。通过这些政策,斯里兰卡对解决非传染性疾病和营养相关问题的承诺显而易见。卫生部领导了政策制定工作,主要利益攸关方也参与其中。然而,斯里兰卡和其他地方有机会学习和加强政策。一些利益相关者在制定国家政策方面的参与和承诺有限,行业干预和其他差距导致政策设计较弱。在制定和执行政策时也很少注意性别问题。结论:为了提高斯里兰卡促进健康饮食的政策和法规的有效性,全面的政策覆盖、多方利益相关者的参与和对国家政策的承诺、平衡的权力动态、技术可行性、有高层政治支持的政府承诺、意识和知识创造、管理行业干扰、整合性别因素是至关重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fiscal policies and regulations for healthy diets in Sri Lanka: an analysis of the political economy of taxation and traffic light labelling for sugar-sweetened beverages.

Background: Unhealthy dietary patterns significantly contribute to rising non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Sri Lanka. The government has implemented policy measures to promote healthy dietary patterns, including the traffic light labelling (TLL) system for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in 2016 and taxation on SSBs in 2017.

Objectives: To analyse how ideas, institutions, and power dynamics influence the formulation and implementation of these two interventions, and to identify strategies for public health actors to advocate for more effective food environment policies in Sri Lanka.

Methods: This study drew on Kingdon's theory of agenda-setting and Campbell's institutionalist approach to develop the theoretical framework. We examined the political economy at the policy development and implementation stages, adopting a deductive framework approach for data collection and analysis. Data were collected from documents and key informants.

Results: NCDs and nutrition are recognised and framed as important policy issues in health-sector policy documents, and the SSB tax and TLL system are seen as means of improving diets and health. Sri Lanka's commitment to addressing NCDs and nutrition-related issues is evident through these policies. The Ministry of Health led policy development, and key stakeholders were involved. However, there are opportunities to learn and strengthen policy in Sri Lanka and elsewhere. Limited involvement and commitment of some stakeholders in developing national policies, industry interferences, and other gaps resulted in weaker policy design. Gender considerations were also given minimal attention in policy formulation and implementation.

Conclusions: To enhance the effectiveness of the policies and regulations to promote healthy diets in Sri Lanka, comprehensive policy coverage, multistakeholder involvement and commitment to national policies, balanced power dynamics, technical feasibility, government commitment backed with high-level political support, awareness, and knowledge creation, managing industry interferences, integrating gender considerations are crucial factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and associated factors for poor mental health among young migrants in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. The effectiveness of rural community health workers in improving health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Adaptation and validation of the Children's Surgical Assessment Tool for Rwandan district hospitals. Electronic health record and primary care physician self-reported quality of care: a multilevel study in China. Recruiting hard-to-reach populations via respondent driven sampling for mobile phone surveys in Colombia: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1