台湾首次检出一种新型巴贝斯虫。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102284
Pai-Shan Chiang, Yi-Wen Lai, Han-Hsuan Chung, Yung-Ting Chia, Chien-Cheng Wang, Hwa-Jen Teng, Shiu-Ling Chen
{"title":"台湾首次检出一种新型巴贝斯虫。","authors":"Pai-Shan Chiang,&nbsp;Yi-Wen Lai,&nbsp;Han-Hsuan Chung,&nbsp;Yung-Ting Chia,&nbsp;Chien-Cheng Wang,&nbsp;Hwa-Jen Teng,&nbsp;Shiu-Ling Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Newly recorded ticks and emerging tick-borne pathogens have recently been reported in subtropical and tropical East Asia. In this study, a total of 1,615 ticks (259 <em>Haemaphysalis hystricis</em>, 1334 <em>Rhipicephalus microplus</em>, 19 <em>H. flava</em>, and 3 <em>R. haemaphysaloides</em>) were collected by flagging from vegetation in Taiwan during 2019–2021. All 1,615 captured tick samples tested negative for SFTSV and <em>Borrelia</em>, but 12 of 356 tick samples tested positive for PCR amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of <em>Babesia</em> spp., with an infection rate of 3.37 % (12/356) and a minimum infection rate of 0.74 % (12/1,615). Among the 12 detected <em>Babesia</em> spp., 11 were identified as <em>Babesia bigemina</em> in <em>R. microplus</em>, and the other one, detected in <em>H. hystricis</em>, was classified as an unnamed novel <em>Babesia</em> sp. Interestingly, the 18S rRNA sequence from the isolate detected in <em>H. hystricis</em> shared 98.79 % to 99.50 % identity with those of recent isolates from Japan, China and Nigeria. The exact origin of the <em>Babesia</em> species is not known, but the findings highlight the importance of international cooperation and the exchange of information on ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This represents a rare report of a <em>Babesia</em> sp. identified in <em>H. hystricis</em>, a tick species that has been proposed as a novel vector for some <em>Babesia</em> spp. This study supports <em>H. hystricis</em> as a possible vector of <em>Babesia</em> spp.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49320,"journal":{"name":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","volume":"15 1","pages":"Article 102284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656/pdfft?md5=be329c489f2313612e305fb2af2856bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X23001656-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First molecular detection of a novel Babesia species from Haemaphysalis hystricis in Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Pai-Shan Chiang,&nbsp;Yi-Wen Lai,&nbsp;Han-Hsuan Chung,&nbsp;Yung-Ting Chia,&nbsp;Chien-Cheng Wang,&nbsp;Hwa-Jen Teng,&nbsp;Shiu-Ling Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Newly recorded ticks and emerging tick-borne pathogens have recently been reported in subtropical and tropical East Asia. In this study, a total of 1,615 ticks (259 <em>Haemaphysalis hystricis</em>, 1334 <em>Rhipicephalus microplus</em>, 19 <em>H. flava</em>, and 3 <em>R. haemaphysaloides</em>) were collected by flagging from vegetation in Taiwan during 2019–2021. All 1,615 captured tick samples tested negative for SFTSV and <em>Borrelia</em>, but 12 of 356 tick samples tested positive for PCR amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of <em>Babesia</em> spp., with an infection rate of 3.37 % (12/356) and a minimum infection rate of 0.74 % (12/1,615). Among the 12 detected <em>Babesia</em> spp., 11 were identified as <em>Babesia bigemina</em> in <em>R. microplus</em>, and the other one, detected in <em>H. hystricis</em>, was classified as an unnamed novel <em>Babesia</em> sp. Interestingly, the 18S rRNA sequence from the isolate detected in <em>H. hystricis</em> shared 98.79 % to 99.50 % identity with those of recent isolates from Japan, China and Nigeria. The exact origin of the <em>Babesia</em> species is not known, but the findings highlight the importance of international cooperation and the exchange of information on ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This represents a rare report of a <em>Babesia</em> sp. identified in <em>H. hystricis</em>, a tick species that has been proposed as a novel vector for some <em>Babesia</em> spp. This study supports <em>H. hystricis</em> as a possible vector of <em>Babesia</em> spp.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 102284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656/pdfft?md5=be329c489f2313612e305fb2af2856bb&pid=1-s2.0-S1877959X23001656-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877959X23001656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近在亚热带和热带东亚报告了新记录的蜱和新出现的蜱传病原体。本研究于2019-2021年在台湾地区的植被上采集蜱类共1615只,其中有血蜱259只、微头蜱1334只、黄血蜱19只、血蜱3只。捕获的1615份蜱虫SFTSV和伯氏疏螺旋体均阴性,但356份蜱虫18S rRNA基因片段PCR扩增阳性12份,感染率为3.37%(12/356),最低感染率为0.74%(12/ 1615)。12种巴贝斯虫中,11种鉴定为微型巴贝斯虫,另一种鉴定为未命名的新型巴贝斯虫。有趣的是,从巴贝斯虫中分离到的18S rRNA序列与最近从日本、中国和尼日利亚分离到的巴贝斯虫具有98.79% ~ 99.50%的一致性。巴贝斯虫物种的确切起源尚不清楚,但这一发现强调了国际合作和交换关于蜱虫和蜱传病原体信息的重要性。这是在巴贝斯虫中发现巴贝斯虫的罕见报道,该蜱种被认为是某些巴贝斯虫的新媒介,本研究支持了巴贝斯虫作为巴贝斯虫的可能媒介。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First molecular detection of a novel Babesia species from Haemaphysalis hystricis in Taiwan

Newly recorded ticks and emerging tick-borne pathogens have recently been reported in subtropical and tropical East Asia. In this study, a total of 1,615 ticks (259 Haemaphysalis hystricis, 1334 Rhipicephalus microplus, 19 H. flava, and 3 R. haemaphysaloides) were collected by flagging from vegetation in Taiwan during 2019–2021. All 1,615 captured tick samples tested negative for SFTSV and Borrelia, but 12 of 356 tick samples tested positive for PCR amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of Babesia spp., with an infection rate of 3.37 % (12/356) and a minimum infection rate of 0.74 % (12/1,615). Among the 12 detected Babesia spp., 11 were identified as Babesia bigemina in R. microplus, and the other one, detected in H. hystricis, was classified as an unnamed novel Babesia sp. Interestingly, the 18S rRNA sequence from the isolate detected in H. hystricis shared 98.79 % to 99.50 % identity with those of recent isolates from Japan, China and Nigeria. The exact origin of the Babesia species is not known, but the findings highlight the importance of international cooperation and the exchange of information on ticks and tick-borne pathogens. This represents a rare report of a Babesia sp. identified in H. hystricis, a tick species that has been proposed as a novel vector for some Babesia spp. This study supports H. hystricis as a possible vector of Babesia spp.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original research papers, short communications, state-of-the-art mini-reviews, letters to the editor, clinical-case studies, announcements of pertinent international meetings, and editorials. The journal covers a broad spectrum and brings together various disciplines, for example, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, genetics, mathematical modelling, veterinary and human medicine. Multidisciplinary approaches and the use of conventional and novel methods/methodologies (in the field and in the laboratory) are crucial for deeper understanding of the natural processes and human behaviour/activities that result in human or animal diseases and in economic effects of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. Such understanding is essential for management of tick populations and tick-borne diseases in an effective and environmentally acceptable manner.
期刊最新文献
Genome sequence of Ehrlichia muris from Ixodes ricinus collected in Italy on a migratory bird provides epidemiological and evolutionary insights Clinical manifestations and outcomes of Tick-borne encephalitis: A systematic literature review Natural Panola Mountain Ehrlichia infections in cattle in a longitudinal study of Angus beef calves Microbial genetic variation impacts host eco-immunological strategies and microparasite fitness in Lyme borreliae-reptile system Detection of Anaplasma bovis-like agent in the Southcentral United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1