混合鱼类渔业的配额使用

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES Fish and Fisheries Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1111/faf.12806
William A. Karp, Michael C. Melnychuk, Robyn E. Forrest, Lorne Richard Little, Kristin McQuaw, Chad Demarest, Ray Hilborn, Nicole Baker, Brian Mose, Bruce Turris, Ernesto Penas Lado
{"title":"混合鱼类渔业的配额使用","authors":"William A. Karp,&nbsp;Michael C. Melnychuk,&nbsp;Robyn E. Forrest,&nbsp;Lorne Richard Little,&nbsp;Kristin McQuaw,&nbsp;Chad Demarest,&nbsp;Ray Hilborn,&nbsp;Nicole Baker,&nbsp;Brian Mose,&nbsp;Bruce Turris,&nbsp;Ernesto Penas Lado","doi":"10.1111/faf.12806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although most fisheries assessment and management focuses on the status of individual stocks, and regulations are commonly established as single-species total allowable catch limits (TACs), much of the catch from global fisheries comes from mixed-stock fisheries where species cannot be harvested separately. We show that in some fisheries where TAC and catch of demersal fish stocks are tracked, the average fraction of TAC harvested ranges from 21% to 68% overall and is declining. This is, in part, related to efforts to protect all species from overfishing, leading to ‘choke species’, which limit fishing pressure on other target species. While some choke species arise from a mix of low and high-productivity species, others result from allocation processes, which can be aggravated by shifting distributions due to climate change. Underutilization of TACs can also result from market limitations, low value of individual species, undercapacity or management measures. Proposed methods for increasing long-term yield require species to be managed in stock groups, or allowing the abundance of some stocks to fall below target reference points. We suggest that the observed low and declining aggregate harvests are due, primarily, to the focus on single-stock sustainability measures, rather than performance of the fisheries in relation to potential overall yield. While there is a growing consensus that single-species management should be replaced by an ecosystem-based approach, this will require clear legislative directives regarding management of the trade-offs involved. Time series considered in this analysis do not extend beyond 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"25 2","pages":"251-267"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quota use in mixed-stock fisheries\",\"authors\":\"William A. Karp,&nbsp;Michael C. Melnychuk,&nbsp;Robyn E. Forrest,&nbsp;Lorne Richard Little,&nbsp;Kristin McQuaw,&nbsp;Chad Demarest,&nbsp;Ray Hilborn,&nbsp;Nicole Baker,&nbsp;Brian Mose,&nbsp;Bruce Turris,&nbsp;Ernesto Penas Lado\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.12806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although most fisheries assessment and management focuses on the status of individual stocks, and regulations are commonly established as single-species total allowable catch limits (TACs), much of the catch from global fisheries comes from mixed-stock fisheries where species cannot be harvested separately. We show that in some fisheries where TAC and catch of demersal fish stocks are tracked, the average fraction of TAC harvested ranges from 21% to 68% overall and is declining. This is, in part, related to efforts to protect all species from overfishing, leading to ‘choke species’, which limit fishing pressure on other target species. While some choke species arise from a mix of low and high-productivity species, others result from allocation processes, which can be aggravated by shifting distributions due to climate change. Underutilization of TACs can also result from market limitations, low value of individual species, undercapacity or management measures. Proposed methods for increasing long-term yield require species to be managed in stock groups, or allowing the abundance of some stocks to fall below target reference points. We suggest that the observed low and declining aggregate harvests are due, primarily, to the focus on single-stock sustainability measures, rather than performance of the fisheries in relation to potential overall yield. While there is a growing consensus that single-species management should be replaced by an ecosystem-based approach, this will require clear legislative directives regarding management of the trade-offs involved. Time series considered in this analysis do not extend beyond 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"251-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12806\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12806","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然大多数渔业评估和管理侧重于单个鱼类种群的状况,并且通常将法规建立为单一物种的总允许捕捞量限制(tac),但全球渔业的大部分捕捞量来自混合鱼类渔业,其中物种不能单独捕捞。我们的研究表明,在一些追踪总TAC和底栖鱼类种群捕捞量的渔业中,总TAC的平均捕捞比例从21%到68%不等,并且正在下降。这在一定程度上与保护所有物种免受过度捕捞的努力有关,从而导致“窒息物种”,从而限制对其他目标物种的捕捞压力。虽然一些窒息物种是由低生产力和高生产力物种混合产生的,但其他物种是由分配过程产生的,而气候变化导致的分布变化可能会加剧这种情况。市场限制、个别物种价值低、能力不足或管理措施也可能导致tac利用不足。拟议的增加长期产量的方法要求对物种进行种群管理,或允许某些种群的丰度低于目标参考点。我们认为,所观察到的低总产量和下降的主要原因是对单一种群可持续性措施的关注,而不是与潜在总体产量相关的渔业绩效。虽然越来越多的人一致认为单一物种的管理应该被基于生态系统的方法所取代,但这将需要关于管理所涉及的权衡的明确立法指令。本分析中考虑的时间序列不超过2019年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quota use in mixed-stock fisheries

Although most fisheries assessment and management focuses on the status of individual stocks, and regulations are commonly established as single-species total allowable catch limits (TACs), much of the catch from global fisheries comes from mixed-stock fisheries where species cannot be harvested separately. We show that in some fisheries where TAC and catch of demersal fish stocks are tracked, the average fraction of TAC harvested ranges from 21% to 68% overall and is declining. This is, in part, related to efforts to protect all species from overfishing, leading to ‘choke species’, which limit fishing pressure on other target species. While some choke species arise from a mix of low and high-productivity species, others result from allocation processes, which can be aggravated by shifting distributions due to climate change. Underutilization of TACs can also result from market limitations, low value of individual species, undercapacity or management measures. Proposed methods for increasing long-term yield require species to be managed in stock groups, or allowing the abundance of some stocks to fall below target reference points. We suggest that the observed low and declining aggregate harvests are due, primarily, to the focus on single-stock sustainability measures, rather than performance of the fisheries in relation to potential overall yield. While there is a growing consensus that single-species management should be replaced by an ecosystem-based approach, this will require clear legislative directives regarding management of the trade-offs involved. Time series considered in this analysis do not extend beyond 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
期刊最新文献
Rebuilding and Reference Points Under Compensatory and Depensatory Recruitment: A Meta‐Analysis of Northeast Atlantic Fish Stocks A Global Synthesis of Environmental Enrichment Effect on Fish Stress Accounting for Salmon Body Size Declines in Fishery Management Can Reduce Conservation Risks Mesopelagic Fish Traits: Functions and Trade‐Offs Closing the Gaps in Fish Welfare: The Case for More Fundamental Work Into Physical Enrichment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1