急诊胆囊切除术的范式转变:Chole-QuiC过程的一个部位经验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084
M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa
{"title":"急诊胆囊切除术的范式转变:Chole-QuiC过程的一个部位经验。","authors":"M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Substantial evidence exists for the superiority of emergency over delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone disease during primary admission. Despite this, emergency surgery rates in the UK remain low compared with other developed countries, with great variation in care across the nation. We aimed to describe the local paradigm shift towards emergency surgery and investigate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational study examining patients enrolled onto an emergency cholecystectomy pathway, following the hospital's subscription to the Royal College of Surgeons of England's Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC), between 1 December 2021 and 31 January 2023. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 307 suitable acute admissions, 261 (85%) had an emergency cholecystectomy, compared with 5% preceding the Chole-QuIC interventions. Waiting time dropped from 67 to 5 days. A total of 208 (79.7%) patients were primary presentations, 92 (35.2%) were classed Tokyo grade 2 and 142 (54.4%) were obese. A total of 23 (8.8%) patients underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 26 (10%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. Favourable outcomes (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were observed in first presentations (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; <i>p</i>=0.042) and for operation times within 7 days (OR 0.32; <i>p</i>=0.037), with worse outcomes in BMI ≥35 (OR 3.32; <i>p</i>=0.005) and operation time >7 days (OR 3.11; <i>p</i>=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy benefits both the patient and the service. Positive outcomes are apparent for early operation in patients presenting for the first time and recurrent attendees, with early operation (<7 days) providing the most favourable outcome in a select patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.\",\"authors\":\"M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Substantial evidence exists for the superiority of emergency over delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone disease during primary admission. Despite this, emergency surgery rates in the UK remain low compared with other developed countries, with great variation in care across the nation. We aimed to describe the local paradigm shift towards emergency surgery and investigate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational study examining patients enrolled onto an emergency cholecystectomy pathway, following the hospital's subscription to the Royal College of Surgeons of England's Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC), between 1 December 2021 and 31 January 2023. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 307 suitable acute admissions, 261 (85%) had an emergency cholecystectomy, compared with 5% preceding the Chole-QuIC interventions. Waiting time dropped from 67 to 5 days. A total of 208 (79.7%) patients were primary presentations, 92 (35.2%) were classed Tokyo grade 2 and 142 (54.4%) were obese. A total of 23 (8.8%) patients underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 26 (10%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. Favourable outcomes (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were observed in first presentations (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; <i>p</i>=0.042) and for operation times within 7 days (OR 0.32; <i>p</i>=0.037), with worse outcomes in BMI ≥35 (OR 3.32; <i>p</i>=0.005) and operation time >7 days (OR 3.11; <i>p</i>=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy benefits both the patient and the service. Positive outcomes are apparent for early operation in patients presenting for the first time and recurrent attendees, with early operation (<7 days) providing the most favourable outcome in a select patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365725/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:有大量证据表明,在初次入院时,急诊优于延迟胆囊切除术。尽管如此,与其他发达国家相比,英国的急诊手术率仍然很低,全国各地的护理差异很大。我们的目的是描述当地向急诊手术的范式转变并调查结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,在医院于2021年12月1日至2023年1月31日期间订阅英国皇家外科学院胆囊切除术质量改善协作(Chole-QuIC)后,对入组急诊胆囊切除术途径的患者进行检查。多变量逻辑回归模型用于确定与术后结果相关的患者和医院因素。结果:在307例合适的急性入院患者中,261例(85%)进行了紧急胆囊切除术,而在进行Chole-QuIC干预之前,这一比例为5%。等待时间由67天缩短至5天。共有208例(79.7%)患者为原发性症状,92例(35.2%)为东京2级,142例(54.4%)为肥胖。共有23例(8.8%)患者术前行内镜逆行胆管造影,26例(10%)患者行胆囊次全切除术。首次就诊时观察到良好的结果(Clavien Dindo≥3)(优势比(OR) 0.35;p=0.042),手术时间在7天内(OR 0.32;p=0.037), BMI≥35者预后较差(OR 3.32;p=0.005),手术时间>7天(OR 3.11;p = 0.037)。结论:急诊胆囊切除术的模式转变对患者和服务都有利。对于首次就诊和复发的患者,早期手术效果明显,早期手术(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.

Introduction: Substantial evidence exists for the superiority of emergency over delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone disease during primary admission. Despite this, emergency surgery rates in the UK remain low compared with other developed countries, with great variation in care across the nation. We aimed to describe the local paradigm shift towards emergency surgery and investigate outcomes.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study examining patients enrolled onto an emergency cholecystectomy pathway, following the hospital's subscription to the Royal College of Surgeons of England's Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC), between 1 December 2021 and 31 January 2023. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with postoperative outcomes.

Results: Of the 307 suitable acute admissions, 261 (85%) had an emergency cholecystectomy, compared with 5% preceding the Chole-QuIC interventions. Waiting time dropped from 67 to 5 days. A total of 208 (79.7%) patients were primary presentations, 92 (35.2%) were classed Tokyo grade 2 and 142 (54.4%) were obese. A total of 23 (8.8%) patients underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 26 (10%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. Favourable outcomes (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were observed in first presentations (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; p=0.042) and for operation times within 7 days (OR 0.32; p=0.037), with worse outcomes in BMI ≥35 (OR 3.32; p=0.005) and operation time >7 days (OR 3.11; p=0.037).

Conclusion: A paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy benefits both the patient and the service. Positive outcomes are apparent for early operation in patients presenting for the first time and recurrent attendees, with early operation (<7 days) providing the most favourable outcome in a select patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
期刊最新文献
Impact of endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy on lower oesophageal sphincter physiology. Kommerell's diverticulum: an unusual cause of unilateral vocal cord palsy? The novel use of a vacuum-assisted closure dressing in the management of Fournier's gangrene. Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool. A new setup for single surgeon paediatric supracondylar fracture pinning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1