Davide Genovese, Laura De Michieli, Giacomo Prete, Manuel De Lazzari, Marco Previtero, Donato Mele, Carlo Cernetti, Giuseppe Tarantini, Sabino Iliceto, Martina Perazzolo Marra
{"title":"用心血管磁共振测量左心房扩张指数估计扩张型心肌病的肺毛细血管楔压。","authors":"Davide Genovese, Laura De Michieli, Giacomo Prete, Manuel De Lazzari, Marco Previtero, Donato Mele, Carlo Cernetti, Giuseppe Tarantini, Sabino Iliceto, Martina Perazzolo Marra","doi":"10.1186/s12968-023-00977-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment is fundamental for managing dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the gold-standard imaging technique for evaluating cardiac chamber volume and function, PCWP is not routinely assessed with CMR. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the left atrial expansion index (LAEI), a LA reservoir function parameter able to estimate filling pressure with echocardiography, as a novel CMR-measured parameter for non-invasive PCWP estimation in DCM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study. We included electively admitted DCM patients referred to our tertiary center for further diagnostic evaluation that underwent a clinically indicated right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR within 24 h. PCWP invasively measured during RHC was used as the reference. LAEI was calculated from CMR-measured LA maximal and minimal volumes as LAEI = ( (LAVmax-LAVmin)/LAVmin) × 100.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 126 patients (47 ± 14 years; 68% male; PCWP = 17 ± 9.3 mmHg) randomly divided into derivation (n = 92) and validation (n = 34) cohorts with comparable characteristics. In the derivation cohort, the log-transformed (ln) LAEI showed a strong linear correlation with PCWP (r = 0.81, p < 0.001) and remained a strong independent PCWP determinant over clinical and conventional CMR parameters. Moreover, lnLAEI accurately identified PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg (AUC = 0.939, p < 0.001), and the optimal cut-off identified (lnLAEI ≤ 3.85) in the derivation cohort discriminated PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg with 82.4% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, and 85.3% accuracy in the validation cohort. Finally, the equation PCWP = 52.33- (9.17xlnLAEI) obtained from the derivation cohort predicted PCWP (-0.1 ± 5.7 mmHg) in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of DCM patients, CMR-measured LAEI resulted in a novel and useful parameter for non-invasive PCWP evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left atrial expansion index measured with cardiovascular magnetic resonance estimates pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in dilated cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Genovese, Laura De Michieli, Giacomo Prete, Manuel De Lazzari, Marco Previtero, Donato Mele, Carlo Cernetti, Giuseppe Tarantini, Sabino Iliceto, Martina Perazzolo Marra\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12968-023-00977-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment is fundamental for managing dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the gold-standard imaging technique for evaluating cardiac chamber volume and function, PCWP is not routinely assessed with CMR. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the left atrial expansion index (LAEI), a LA reservoir function parameter able to estimate filling pressure with echocardiography, as a novel CMR-measured parameter for non-invasive PCWP estimation in DCM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study. We included electively admitted DCM patients referred to our tertiary center for further diagnostic evaluation that underwent a clinically indicated right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR within 24 h. PCWP invasively measured during RHC was used as the reference. LAEI was calculated from CMR-measured LA maximal and minimal volumes as LAEI = ( (LAVmax-LAVmin)/LAVmin) × 100.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 126 patients (47 ± 14 years; 68% male; PCWP = 17 ± 9.3 mmHg) randomly divided into derivation (n = 92) and validation (n = 34) cohorts with comparable characteristics. In the derivation cohort, the log-transformed (ln) LAEI showed a strong linear correlation with PCWP (r = 0.81, p < 0.001) and remained a strong independent PCWP determinant over clinical and conventional CMR parameters. Moreover, lnLAEI accurately identified PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg (AUC = 0.939, p < 0.001), and the optimal cut-off identified (lnLAEI ≤ 3.85) in the derivation cohort discriminated PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg with 82.4% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, and 85.3% accuracy in the validation cohort. Finally, the equation PCWP = 52.33- (9.17xlnLAEI) obtained from the derivation cohort predicted PCWP (-0.1 ± 5.7 mmHg) in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort of DCM patients, CMR-measured LAEI resulted in a novel and useful parameter for non-invasive PCWP evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00977-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00977-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Left atrial expansion index measured with cardiovascular magnetic resonance estimates pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) assessment is fundamental for managing dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the gold-standard imaging technique for evaluating cardiac chamber volume and function, PCWP is not routinely assessed with CMR. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the left atrial expansion index (LAEI), a LA reservoir function parameter able to estimate filling pressure with echocardiography, as a novel CMR-measured parameter for non-invasive PCWP estimation in DCM patients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study. We included electively admitted DCM patients referred to our tertiary center for further diagnostic evaluation that underwent a clinically indicated right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR within 24 h. PCWP invasively measured during RHC was used as the reference. LAEI was calculated from CMR-measured LA maximal and minimal volumes as LAEI = ( (LAVmax-LAVmin)/LAVmin) × 100.
Results: We enrolled 126 patients (47 ± 14 years; 68% male; PCWP = 17 ± 9.3 mmHg) randomly divided into derivation (n = 92) and validation (n = 34) cohorts with comparable characteristics. In the derivation cohort, the log-transformed (ln) LAEI showed a strong linear correlation with PCWP (r = 0.81, p < 0.001) and remained a strong independent PCWP determinant over clinical and conventional CMR parameters. Moreover, lnLAEI accurately identified PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg (AUC = 0.939, p < 0.001), and the optimal cut-off identified (lnLAEI ≤ 3.85) in the derivation cohort discriminated PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg with 82.4% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, and 85.3% accuracy in the validation cohort. Finally, the equation PCWP = 52.33- (9.17xlnLAEI) obtained from the derivation cohort predicted PCWP (-0.1 ± 5.7 mmHg) in the validation cohort.
Conclusions: In this cohort of DCM patients, CMR-measured LAEI resulted in a novel and useful parameter for non-invasive PCWP evaluation.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system.
New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis.
Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR.
Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
