Lisanne Koomen, Ilona van de Meent, Floor Elferink, Ingeborg Wilting, Wiepke Cahn
{"title":"严重精神疾病门诊患者处方不当的患病率及预测因素。","authors":"Lisanne Koomen, Ilona van de Meent, Floor Elferink, Ingeborg Wilting, Wiepke Cahn","doi":"10.1177/20451253231211576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is frequent in geriatrics and results in an increased risk for adverse effects, morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life. Research on PIP in psychiatry has mainly focused on elderly patients and inpatients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence and the predictors of PIP of psychotropic medication in outpatients with severe mental illness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is part of the Muva study, a pragmatic open Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial of a physical activity intervention for patients (age ⩾ 16 years) with severe mental illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured medication interview, questionnaires on social functioning, quality of life and psychiatric symptoms, and BMI and waist circumference measurements were performed followed by a structured medication review. Patients were divided into groups: PIP <i>versus</i> no PIP. Between-group differences were calculated and a multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to examine predictors for PIP. A receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 75 patients, an average of 5.2 medications of which 2.5 psychotropic medication was used. 35 (46.7%) patients were identified with PIP. Unindicated long-term benzodiazepine use was the most frequently occurring PIP (34.1%). Predictors of PIP were female gender [odds ratio (OR) = 4.88, confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-20.58, <i>p</i> = 0.03], number of medications (OR = 1.41, CI = 1.07-1.86, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and lower social functioning (OR = 1.42, CI = 1.01-2.00, <i>p</i> = 0.05). The AUC was 0.88 for the combined prediction model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of PIP of psychotropic medication in outpatients with severe mental illness is high. It is therefore important to identify, and where possible, resolve PIP by frequently performing a medication review with specific attention to females, patients with a higher number of medications and patients with lower social functioning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered in The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) as NTR NL9163 on 20 December 2020 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9163).</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and predictors of inappropriate prescribing in outpatients with severe mental illness.\",\"authors\":\"Lisanne Koomen, Ilona van de Meent, Floor Elferink, Ingeborg Wilting, Wiepke Cahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20451253231211576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is frequent in geriatrics and results in an increased risk for adverse effects, morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life. Research on PIP in psychiatry has mainly focused on elderly patients and inpatients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence and the predictors of PIP of psychotropic medication in outpatients with severe mental illness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is part of the Muva study, a pragmatic open Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial of a physical activity intervention for patients (age ⩾ 16 years) with severe mental illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured medication interview, questionnaires on social functioning, quality of life and psychiatric symptoms, and BMI and waist circumference measurements were performed followed by a structured medication review. Patients were divided into groups: PIP <i>versus</i> no PIP. Between-group differences were calculated and a multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to examine predictors for PIP. A receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 75 patients, an average of 5.2 medications of which 2.5 psychotropic medication was used. 35 (46.7%) patients were identified with PIP. Unindicated long-term benzodiazepine use was the most frequently occurring PIP (34.1%). Predictors of PIP were female gender [odds ratio (OR) = 4.88, confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-20.58, <i>p</i> = 0.03], number of medications (OR = 1.41, CI = 1.07-1.86, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and lower social functioning (OR = 1.42, CI = 1.01-2.00, <i>p</i> = 0.05). The AUC was 0.88 for the combined prediction model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of PIP of psychotropic medication in outpatients with severe mental illness is high. It is therefore important to identify, and where possible, resolve PIP by frequently performing a medication review with specific attention to females, patients with a higher number of medications and patients with lower social functioning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered in The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) as NTR NL9163 on 20 December 2020 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9163).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231211576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253231211576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:潜在不当处方(PIP)在老年医学中很常见,并导致不良反应、发病率、死亡率和生活质量降低的风险增加。精神病学对PIP的研究主要集中在老年患者和住院患者。目的:了解重症精神疾病门诊患者精神药物PIP的患病率及预测因素。设计:该研究是Muva研究的一部分,Muva研究是对患有严重精神疾病的患者(年龄大于或等于16岁)进行身体活动干预的一项实用的开放阶梯楔形簇随机试验。方法:采用结构化的药物访谈、社会功能、生活质量和精神症状问卷、BMI和腰围测量,然后进行结构化的药物回顾。患者分为两组:有PIP组和无PIP组。计算组间差异,并进行多元二元逻辑回归来检查PIP的预测因子。进行受试者工作特性分析以确定曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:75例患者平均使用5.2种药物,其中平均使用2.5种精神药物。35例(46.7%)患者被确诊为PIP。无指征的长期苯二氮卓类药物使用是最常见的PIP(34.1%)。PIP的预测因子为女性[优势比(OR) = 4.88,可信区间(CI) = 1.16 ~ 20.58, p = 0.03]、用药数量(OR = 1.41, CI = 1.07 ~ 1.86, p = 0.02)和社会功能低下(OR = 1.42, CI = 1.01 ~ 2.00, p = 0.05)。联合预测模型的AUC为0.88。结论:门诊重症精神疾病患者精神药物的PIP患病率较高。因此,重要的是要确定,并在可能的情况下,通过经常进行药物审查来解决PIP,特别关注女性,药物数量较多的患者和社会功能较低的患者。试验注册:该试验于2020年12月20日在荷兰试验登记处(NTR)注册为NTR NL9163 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9163)。
Prevalence and predictors of inappropriate prescribing in outpatients with severe mental illness.
Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is frequent in geriatrics and results in an increased risk for adverse effects, morbidity, mortality and reduced quality of life. Research on PIP in psychiatry has mainly focused on elderly patients and inpatients.
Objectives: To determine the prevalence and the predictors of PIP of psychotropic medication in outpatients with severe mental illness.
Design: This study is part of the Muva study, a pragmatic open Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial of a physical activity intervention for patients (age ⩾ 16 years) with severe mental illness.
Methods: A structured medication interview, questionnaires on social functioning, quality of life and psychiatric symptoms, and BMI and waist circumference measurements were performed followed by a structured medication review. Patients were divided into groups: PIP versus no PIP. Between-group differences were calculated and a multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to examine predictors for PIP. A receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed to determine the area under the curve (AUC).
Results: In 75 patients, an average of 5.2 medications of which 2.5 psychotropic medication was used. 35 (46.7%) patients were identified with PIP. Unindicated long-term benzodiazepine use was the most frequently occurring PIP (34.1%). Predictors of PIP were female gender [odds ratio (OR) = 4.88, confidence interval (CI) = 1.16-20.58, p = 0.03], number of medications (OR = 1.41, CI = 1.07-1.86, p = 0.02) and lower social functioning (OR = 1.42, CI = 1.01-2.00, p = 0.05). The AUC was 0.88 for the combined prediction model.
Conclusion: The prevalence of PIP of psychotropic medication in outpatients with severe mental illness is high. It is therefore important to identify, and where possible, resolve PIP by frequently performing a medication review with specific attention to females, patients with a higher number of medications and patients with lower social functioning.
Trial registration: This trial was registered in The Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) as NTR NL9163 on 20 December 2020 (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL9163).
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.