机器人肺叶前路切除术的挑战。

Atsushi Osoegawa, Miyuki Abe, Michiyo Miyawaki, Takashi Karashima, Yohei Takumi, Shinkichi Takamori, Kenji Sugio
{"title":"机器人肺叶前路切除术的挑战。","authors":"Atsushi Osoegawa, Miyuki Abe, Michiyo Miyawaki, Takashi Karashima, Yohei Takumi, Shinkichi Takamori, Kenji Sugio","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become popular because of its minimally invasive nature and reduced burden on surgeons. The anterior approach (AA) is beneficial because it utilizes the same field of view and procedures as thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery, although the disadvantages are less well-known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined 35 consecutive patients who underwent RATS lobectomy via the AA, focusing on clinical factors and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 12 males and 23 females with a median console time of 177 (120-346) min, median blood loss of 0 (0-100) mL, and median stapler usage of 5 (2-10) units. Postoperative complications, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III, included three cases of grade IIIa (prolonged air leakage) and one case each of grade IIIb and grade IVa (middle lobe torsion and ventricular arrhythmia). The influence of stapling device operation cannot be ruled out in prolonged air leakage and middle lobe torsion. A moderate correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.492, p = 0.003) was observed between console time and the number of staplers used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no severe incidence of vascular injury was observed with the AA, complications related to the use of stapling devices were noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in Robotic Lung Lobectomy through the Anterior Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Atsushi Osoegawa, Miyuki Abe, Michiyo Miyawaki, Takashi Karashima, Yohei Takumi, Shinkichi Takamori, Kenji Sugio\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become popular because of its minimally invasive nature and reduced burden on surgeons. The anterior approach (AA) is beneficial because it utilizes the same field of view and procedures as thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery, although the disadvantages are less well-known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively examined 35 consecutive patients who underwent RATS lobectomy via the AA, focusing on clinical factors and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 12 males and 23 females with a median console time of 177 (120-346) min, median blood loss of 0 (0-100) mL, and median stapler usage of 5 (2-10) units. Postoperative complications, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III, included three cases of grade IIIa (prolonged air leakage) and one case each of grade IIIb and grade IVa (middle lobe torsion and ventricular arrhythmia). The influence of stapling device operation cannot be ruled out in prolonged air leakage and middle lobe torsion. A moderate correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.492, p = 0.003) was observed between console time and the number of staplers used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although no severe incidence of vascular injury was observed with the AA, complications related to the use of stapling devices were noted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10902646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)因其微创性和减轻外科医生负担而受到欢迎。前路入路(AA)是有益的,因为它与开胸手术和视频辅助胸外科手术使用相同的视野和程序,尽管缺点不太为人所知。方法:我们回顾性分析35例经AA行大鼠肺叶切除术的患者,重点分析临床因素和术后并发症。结果:该研究包括12名男性和23名女性,中位控制时间为177 (120-346)min,中位失血量为0 (0-100)mL,中位订书机使用量为5(2-10)个单位。术后并发症Clavien-Dindo分级≥III, IIIa级(长时间漏气)3例,IIIb级和IVa级(中肺叶扭转和室性心律失常)各1例。在长时间的漏气和中间瓣扭扭中,不能排除吻合器操作的影响。控制台时间与订书机使用次数有中等相关性(相关系数= 0.492,p = 0.003)。结论:虽然没有观察到严重的血管损伤,但注意到与吻合器使用相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Challenges in Robotic Lung Lobectomy through the Anterior Approach.

Purpose: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become popular because of its minimally invasive nature and reduced burden on surgeons. The anterior approach (AA) is beneficial because it utilizes the same field of view and procedures as thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery, although the disadvantages are less well-known.

Methods: We retrospectively examined 35 consecutive patients who underwent RATS lobectomy via the AA, focusing on clinical factors and postoperative complications.

Results: The study included 12 males and 23 females with a median console time of 177 (120-346) min, median blood loss of 0 (0-100) mL, and median stapler usage of 5 (2-10) units. Postoperative complications, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III, included three cases of grade IIIa (prolonged air leakage) and one case each of grade IIIb and grade IVa (middle lobe torsion and ventricular arrhythmia). The influence of stapling device operation cannot be ruled out in prolonged air leakage and middle lobe torsion. A moderate correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.492, p = 0.003) was observed between console time and the number of staplers used.

Conclusion: Although no severe incidence of vascular injury was observed with the AA, complications related to the use of stapling devices were noted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lateral Dorsal Basal Lung Resection Based on Functional Preserving Sublobectomy Method: Single-Center Experience. A Novel Method of Real-Time Assessment for Coronary Artery Anastomosis Skill. Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection? Long-Term Outcomes of Simple Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Based on the Initial Aortic Diameter. Total Arterial Revascularization: Evaluating the Length of the Radial Artery in a Composite Graft Configuration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1