探讨社区财富存量、国家农场到学校政策和农场到学校活动强度之间的关系

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102570
Pratyoosh Kashyap, Becca B.R. Jablonski, Allison Bauman
{"title":"探讨社区财富存量、国家农场到学校政策和农场到学校活动强度之间的关系","authors":"Pratyoosh Kashyap,&nbsp;Becca B.R. Jablonski,&nbsp;Allison Bauman","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Farm to School (FTS) is a widely implemented public food procurement program in the U.S., and the number of state and Federal policies promoting it continue to grow. However, previous research has found inconclusive results associated with state-level policies. One reason may be that FTS adoption is associated with different stocks of community wealth (assets including human, social, and financial capital, net of liabilities). This research leverages the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 2019 FTS Census, a new disaggregated database on state-level FTS policies, and a new comprehensive dataset of stocks of community wealth to assess this relationship. We find positive associations between cultural and social capital and FTS intensity (an index representing the extent of FTS participation), highlighting community assets that are often overlooked in community development programs. Further, we find that different types of state FTS policies are associated with FTS intensity; procurement policies have positive associations and education policies have negative associations. Results provide rationale for more nuanced consideration of local assets in prioritizing the types of FTS policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationships among stocks of community wealth, state farm to school policies, and the intensity of farm to school activities\",\"authors\":\"Pratyoosh Kashyap,&nbsp;Becca B.R. Jablonski,&nbsp;Allison Bauman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Farm to School (FTS) is a widely implemented public food procurement program in the U.S., and the number of state and Federal policies promoting it continue to grow. However, previous research has found inconclusive results associated with state-level policies. One reason may be that FTS adoption is associated with different stocks of community wealth (assets including human, social, and financial capital, net of liabilities). This research leverages the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 2019 FTS Census, a new disaggregated database on state-level FTS policies, and a new comprehensive dataset of stocks of community wealth to assess this relationship. We find positive associations between cultural and social capital and FTS intensity (an index representing the extent of FTS participation), highlighting community assets that are often overlooked in community development programs. Further, we find that different types of state FTS policies are associated with FTS intensity; procurement policies have positive associations and education policies have negative associations. Results provide rationale for more nuanced consideration of local assets in prioritizing the types of FTS policy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001689\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001689","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农场到学校(FTS)是美国广泛实施的一项公共食品采购计划,推动这一计划的州和联邦政策的数量在不断增加。然而,之前的研究发现,与州一级政策相关的结果并不确定。一个原因可能是FTS的采用与不同的社区财富存量(包括人力、社会和金融资本的资产,净负债)有关。本研究利用了美国农业部2019年的FTS人口普查,一个关于州一级FTS政策的新分类数据库,以及一个新的社区财富存量综合数据集来评估这种关系。我们发现文化和社会资本与家庭服务强度(代表家庭服务参与程度的指数)之间存在正相关关系,突出了社区发展计划中经常被忽视的社区资产。此外,我们发现不同类型的州FTS政策与FTS强度相关;采购政策具有积极的关联,而教育政策具有消极的关联。结果为在确定FTS政策类型的优先级时更细致地考虑本地资产提供了基本原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the relationships among stocks of community wealth, state farm to school policies, and the intensity of farm to school activities

Farm to School (FTS) is a widely implemented public food procurement program in the U.S., and the number of state and Federal policies promoting it continue to grow. However, previous research has found inconclusive results associated with state-level policies. One reason may be that FTS adoption is associated with different stocks of community wealth (assets including human, social, and financial capital, net of liabilities). This research leverages the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 2019 FTS Census, a new disaggregated database on state-level FTS policies, and a new comprehensive dataset of stocks of community wealth to assess this relationship. We find positive associations between cultural and social capital and FTS intensity (an index representing the extent of FTS participation), highlighting community assets that are often overlooked in community development programs. Further, we find that different types of state FTS policies are associated with FTS intensity; procurement policies have positive associations and education policies have negative associations. Results provide rationale for more nuanced consideration of local assets in prioritizing the types of FTS policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on food policy in the context of healthy and sustainable diets The impact of pre-empting dual food quality regulation on product reformulation and packaging Autopsy of a futures market failure: Japan’s Dojima rice futures in the early 21st century Women improving nutrition through self-help groups in India: Does nutrition information help? Integrating system dynamics to value chain analysis to address price volatility in the Indonesian chilli value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1