空间平衡中的垄断

IF 3.5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Regional Science and Urban Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103956
Matthew E. Kahn , Joseph Tracy
{"title":"空间平衡中的垄断","authors":"Matthew E. Kahn ,&nbsp;Joseph Tracy","doi":"10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>An emerging labor economics literature examines the consequences of firms exercising market power in local labor markets. The extent of this market power is likely to vary across local labor markets. In choosing what local labor market to live and work in, workers tradeoff wages, </span>house prices<span><span> and local amenities. Building on the Rosen/Roback spatial equilibrium model, we investigate how the existence of local monopsony power affects the cross-sectional spatial distribution of house prices across cities. We find that house prices decline with increases in the employment concentration in the local market. For renters, this offsets roughly 70 percent of the estimated monopsony wage effect and shifts part of the costs of monopsony to homeowners. We find evidence that </span>collective bargaining and minimum wages limit the extent of capitalization of monopsony power into house prices.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48196,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science and Urban Economics","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 103956"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monopsony in spatial equilibrium\",\"authors\":\"Matthew E. Kahn ,&nbsp;Joseph Tracy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>An emerging labor economics literature examines the consequences of firms exercising market power in local labor markets. The extent of this market power is likely to vary across local labor markets. In choosing what local labor market to live and work in, workers tradeoff wages, </span>house prices<span><span> and local amenities. Building on the Rosen/Roback spatial equilibrium model, we investigate how the existence of local monopsony power affects the cross-sectional spatial distribution of house prices across cities. We find that house prices decline with increases in the employment concentration in the local market. For renters, this offsets roughly 70 percent of the estimated monopsony wage effect and shifts part of the costs of monopsony to homeowners. We find evidence that </span>collective bargaining and minimum wages limit the extent of capitalization of monopsony power into house prices.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Science and Urban Economics\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Science and Urban Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046223000911\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science and Urban Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046223000911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新兴的劳动经济学文献研究了企业在当地劳动力市场中行使市场力量的后果。这种市场力量的程度可能因当地劳动力市场而异。在选择在当地哪个劳动力市场生活和工作时,工人们权衡了工资、房价和当地的便利设施。在Rosen/Roback空间均衡模型的基础上,研究了地方垄断权力的存在对城市房价横截面空间分布的影响。我们发现房价随着当地市场就业集中度的增加而下降。对于租房者来说,这抵消了大约70%的垄断工资效应,并将部分垄断成本转嫁给了房主。我们发现证据表明,集体谈判和最低工资限制了垄断力量资本化到房价的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monopsony in spatial equilibrium

An emerging labor economics literature examines the consequences of firms exercising market power in local labor markets. The extent of this market power is likely to vary across local labor markets. In choosing what local labor market to live and work in, workers tradeoff wages, house prices and local amenities. Building on the Rosen/Roback spatial equilibrium model, we investigate how the existence of local monopsony power affects the cross-sectional spatial distribution of house prices across cities. We find that house prices decline with increases in the employment concentration in the local market. For renters, this offsets roughly 70 percent of the estimated monopsony wage effect and shifts part of the costs of monopsony to homeowners. We find evidence that collective bargaining and minimum wages limit the extent of capitalization of monopsony power into house prices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Regional Science and Urban Economics facilitates and encourages high-quality scholarship on important issues in regional and urban economics. It publishes significant contributions that are theoretical or empirical, positive or normative. It solicits original papers with a spatial dimension that can be of interest to economists. Empirical papers studying causal mechanisms are expected to propose a convincing identification strategy.
期刊最新文献
Rational cuts? The local impact of closing undersized schools Centrality bias in inter-city trade Your room is ready: Tourism and urban revival Employer-provided parking: Departure time choice, investment decision, and welfare effects Hospital closure in urban and rural areas and patients’ welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1