立体定向脑干预:确定活检失败和出血的风险

Mohamed Salah Mohamed, Wael Elmesallamy, Ahmed Mohammad Alaa Eldin Shalaby
{"title":"立体定向脑干预:确定活检失败和出血的风险","authors":"Mohamed Salah Mohamed,&nbsp;Wael Elmesallamy,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammad Alaa Eldin Shalaby","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The advent of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized stereotactic brain interventions, which enabled precise targeting of deep brain structures and enhanced patient safety in modern neurosurgery. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with biopsy failure and hemorrhage in CT-guided brain stereotactic surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the current study, we present a retrospective descriptive analysis of cases that showed biopsy failures and hemorrhage after CT-guided stereotactic brain biopsy surgeries at our department from January 2019 to January 2021. Biopsies were obtained using a Sedan-type needle.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 80 patients who underwent CT-guided stereotactic surgeries, two patients (2.5 %) experienced biopsy failure, necessitating a repeat procedure. There was a notably higher risk of biopsy failure when fewer than four biopsy attempts were made (adjusted odds ratio = 6.4, 95 % CI 1.8 to 16.7). A postprocedural CT scan revealed intracranial hemorrhage in five patients (6.25 %); four of these cases were silent, with no accompanying neurological complications. Four out of the five hemorrhage cases were associated with astrocytoma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Stereotactic surgery provides a precise and minimally invasive approach to target lesions with a relatively low risk of biopsy failures and hemorrhage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101885"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001688/pdfft?md5=e8213b6f26b979ff37eda5a5cf589b1b&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751923001688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic brain Interventions: Identifying risks for biopsy failures and hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Salah Mohamed,&nbsp;Wael Elmesallamy,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammad Alaa Eldin Shalaby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inat.2023.101885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The advent of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized stereotactic brain interventions, which enabled precise targeting of deep brain structures and enhanced patient safety in modern neurosurgery. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with biopsy failure and hemorrhage in CT-guided brain stereotactic surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the current study, we present a retrospective descriptive analysis of cases that showed biopsy failures and hemorrhage after CT-guided stereotactic brain biopsy surgeries at our department from January 2019 to January 2021. Biopsies were obtained using a Sedan-type needle.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 80 patients who underwent CT-guided stereotactic surgeries, two patients (2.5 %) experienced biopsy failure, necessitating a repeat procedure. There was a notably higher risk of biopsy failure when fewer than four biopsy attempts were made (adjusted odds ratio = 6.4, 95 % CI 1.8 to 16.7). A postprocedural CT scan revealed intracranial hemorrhage in five patients (6.25 %); four of these cases were silent, with no accompanying neurological complications. Four out of the five hemorrhage cases were associated with astrocytoma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Stereotactic surgery provides a precise and minimally invasive approach to target lesions with a relatively low risk of biopsy failures and hemorrhage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001688/pdfft?md5=e8213b6f26b979ff37eda5a5cf589b1b&pid=1-s2.0-S2214751923001688-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751923001688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)的出现彻底改变了立体定向脑干预,使现代神经外科能够精确定位脑深部结构并提高患者的安全性。本研究旨在探讨ct引导下脑立体定向手术中活检失败和出血的相关危险因素。方法回顾性分析2019年1月至2021年1月我科ct引导下立体定向脑活检术后活检失败出血病例。使用sedan型针头进行活检。结果80例接受ct引导立体定向手术的患者中,2例(2.5%)活检失败,需要重复手术。当活检次数少于4次时,活检失败的风险明显更高(校正优势比= 6.4,95% CI 1.8 ~ 16.7)。术后CT扫描显示颅内出血5例(6.25%);其中4例无症状,没有伴随的神经系统并发症。5例出血病例中有4例伴有星形细胞瘤。结论立体定向手术提供了一种精确和微创的方法来定位病变,活检失败和出血的风险相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stereotactic brain Interventions: Identifying risks for biopsy failures and hemorrhage

Background

The advent of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized stereotactic brain interventions, which enabled precise targeting of deep brain structures and enhanced patient safety in modern neurosurgery. This study aims to investigate the risk factors associated with biopsy failure and hemorrhage in CT-guided brain stereotactic surgeries.

Methods

In the current study, we present a retrospective descriptive analysis of cases that showed biopsy failures and hemorrhage after CT-guided stereotactic brain biopsy surgeries at our department from January 2019 to January 2021. Biopsies were obtained using a Sedan-type needle.

Results

Out of the 80 patients who underwent CT-guided stereotactic surgeries, two patients (2.5 %) experienced biopsy failure, necessitating a repeat procedure. There was a notably higher risk of biopsy failure when fewer than four biopsy attempts were made (adjusted odds ratio = 6.4, 95 % CI 1.8 to 16.7). A postprocedural CT scan revealed intracranial hemorrhage in five patients (6.25 %); four of these cases were silent, with no accompanying neurological complications. Four out of the five hemorrhage cases were associated with astrocytoma.

Conclusions

Stereotactic surgery provides a precise and minimally invasive approach to target lesions with a relatively low risk of biopsy failures and hemorrhage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain using ReActiv8® in a patient with a large lumbar disc herniation Topical dexamethason effectiveness combined with surgical intervention in patients suffering from chronic subdural hematoma Cerebellopontine angle epidermoid cyst presenting with only trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective study at the single-center in Vietnam Teta injury at the craniovertebral junction: A case report Clinical characteristics and management of vertebral artery dissection without definitive imaging features: A single center cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1