第二语言协作写作中谈判的方式和质量

IF 3.6 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1093/applin/amad081
Zhenhao Cao, Rachael Ruegg, Stephen Skalicky
{"title":"第二语言协作写作中谈判的方式和质量","authors":"Zhenhao Cao, Rachael Ruegg, Stephen Skalicky","doi":"10.1093/applin/amad081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although peer interaction has received attention in second language (L2) collaborative writing (CW) research, the manner and quality of peer interaction have been less investigated. Previous studies usually examined peer interaction by looking at language-related episodes, overlooking the ways students negotiate for different types of knowledge for successful writing, such as content, organisation, and discourse. Moreover, the association between quality of negotiation and students’ writing process is elusive. This study aims to examine the way students discussed different aspects of writing during interaction and explore the impact of quality of negotiation on students’ subsequent writing and revisions. Data were collected from an intact academic writing class at a New Zealand university, where students formed groups to produce a single text per group over 12 weeks. Results showed that students discussed content and organisation more than language, and different qualities of negotiation were associated with different writing and revision outcomes. In addition, students discussed both local and global aspects of writing, and quality of negotiation is an important factor that mediates students’ writing and revision behaviours.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":" 747","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manner and Quality of Negotiation During L2 Collaborative Writing\",\"authors\":\"Zhenhao Cao, Rachael Ruegg, Stephen Skalicky\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/applin/amad081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although peer interaction has received attention in second language (L2) collaborative writing (CW) research, the manner and quality of peer interaction have been less investigated. Previous studies usually examined peer interaction by looking at language-related episodes, overlooking the ways students negotiate for different types of knowledge for successful writing, such as content, organisation, and discourse. Moreover, the association between quality of negotiation and students’ writing process is elusive. This study aims to examine the way students discussed different aspects of writing during interaction and explore the impact of quality of negotiation on students’ subsequent writing and revisions. Data were collected from an intact academic writing class at a New Zealand university, where students formed groups to produce a single text per group over 12 weeks. Results showed that students discussed content and organisation more than language, and different qualities of negotiation were associated with different writing and revision outcomes. In addition, students discussed both local and global aspects of writing, and quality of negotiation is an important factor that mediates students’ writing and revision behaviours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" 747\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad081\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然同伴互动在第二语言协作写作(CW)研究中受到关注,但对同伴互动的方式和质量的研究却很少。以前的研究通常通过观察与语言相关的情节来考察同伴互动,而忽略了学生为成功写作而争取不同类型知识的方式,比如内容、组织和话语。此外,谈判的质量和学生的写作过程之间的联系是难以捉摸的。本研究旨在考察学生在互动中讨论写作不同方面的方式,并探讨谈判质量对学生后续写作和修改的影响。数据是从新西兰一所大学的完整学术写作课上收集的,学生们组成小组,在12周的时间里每组写一篇文章。结果表明,学生讨论的内容和组织多于语言,不同的谈判质量与不同的写作和修改结果相关。此外,学生们讨论了写作的本地和全球方面,谈判质量是调节学生写作和修改行为的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Manner and Quality of Negotiation During L2 Collaborative Writing
Although peer interaction has received attention in second language (L2) collaborative writing (CW) research, the manner and quality of peer interaction have been less investigated. Previous studies usually examined peer interaction by looking at language-related episodes, overlooking the ways students negotiate for different types of knowledge for successful writing, such as content, organisation, and discourse. Moreover, the association between quality of negotiation and students’ writing process is elusive. This study aims to examine the way students discussed different aspects of writing during interaction and explore the impact of quality of negotiation on students’ subsequent writing and revisions. Data were collected from an intact academic writing class at a New Zealand university, where students formed groups to produce a single text per group over 12 weeks. Results showed that students discussed content and organisation more than language, and different qualities of negotiation were associated with different writing and revision outcomes. In addition, students discussed both local and global aspects of writing, and quality of negotiation is an important factor that mediates students’ writing and revision behaviours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
期刊最新文献
Decolonizing language learning in digital environments through the voices of plurilingual learners in the Global South Overcoming COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: An investigation of the Foreign Language Effect ‘We can fix this. Let’s get you out of trouble, son’: an analysis of the transitivity and appraisal patterns in the Netflix TV show When They See Us How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation Linking adverbials in children’s writing: Exploring variation across year groups, genres, and disciplines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1