与女性发生性关系的女性是宫颈癌的“高危”人群吗?对新西兰奥特罗阿妇女的探索性研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexual health Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1071/SH23145
Sonja J Ellis
{"title":"与女性发生性关系的女性是宫颈癌的“高危”人群吗?对新西兰奥特罗阿妇女的探索性研究。","authors":"Sonja J Ellis","doi":"10.1071/SH23145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International research consistently indicates that women-who-have-sex-with-women (WSW) are less likely to engage in cervical screening than heterosexual women. In the main, studies have explored rates of engagement and highlighted some reasons for non-engagement. This study extends on this work by exploring perceptions among sexual minority women (WSW) for lower rates of engagement among WSW more generally and is the first study on this topic undertaken in Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 177 self-identified WSW domiciled in New Zealand completed an online survey about their engagement in cervical screening, reasons for engaging (or not) in cervical screening, and perceptions of why SMW might be less likely to engage in cervical screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer than half of participants had engaged in cervical screening every 3years as recommended, with women who had only ever had sex with other women being significantly less likely to have engaged in screening. A lack of clear information about risk relative to sexual history, heteronormativity, and the invasive nature of screening were the dominant reasons for lower engagement among WSW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A legacy of misinformation, and endemic heteronormativity in public health messaging around cervical screening is a significant barrier to engagement in screening for WSW. To increase engagement in screening among WSW, public health information needs to specifically address the needs of WSW.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":" ","pages":"NULL"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are women-who-have-sex-with-women an 'at-risk' group for cervical cancer? An exploratory study of women in Aotearoa New Zealand.\",\"authors\":\"Sonja J Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/SH23145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International research consistently indicates that women-who-have-sex-with-women (WSW) are less likely to engage in cervical screening than heterosexual women. In the main, studies have explored rates of engagement and highlighted some reasons for non-engagement. This study extends on this work by exploring perceptions among sexual minority women (WSW) for lower rates of engagement among WSW more generally and is the first study on this topic undertaken in Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 177 self-identified WSW domiciled in New Zealand completed an online survey about their engagement in cervical screening, reasons for engaging (or not) in cervical screening, and perceptions of why SMW might be less likely to engage in cervical screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fewer than half of participants had engaged in cervical screening every 3years as recommended, with women who had only ever had sex with other women being significantly less likely to have engaged in screening. A lack of clear information about risk relative to sexual history, heteronormativity, and the invasive nature of screening were the dominant reasons for lower engagement among WSW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A legacy of misinformation, and endemic heteronormativity in public health messaging around cervical screening is a significant barrier to engagement in screening for WSW. To increase engagement in screening among WSW, public health information needs to specifically address the needs of WSW.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"NULL\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH23145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH23145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际研究一致表明,与异性恋女性相比,与女性发生过性关系的女性(WSW)更不可能进行宫颈筛查。总的来说,研究主要是探讨参与度,并强调一些不参与度的原因。本研究通过探索性少数群体妇女(WSW)对更普遍的WSW参与率较低的看法,扩展了这项工作,这是在新西兰奥特罗阿进行的第一个关于这一主题的研究。方法:对177名新西兰籍女女性进行了一项在线调查,内容包括她们是否参与子宫颈筛查、参与(或不参与)子宫颈筛查的原因,以及对女女性不太可能参与子宫颈筛查的原因的看法。结果:只有不到一半的参与者按照建议每3年做一次子宫颈检查,那些只与其他女性发生过性行为的女性更不可能进行检查。缺乏与性史、异性恋性行为相关的明确风险信息,以及筛查的侵入性是导致WSW参与率较低的主要原因。结论:关于子宫颈筛查的公共卫生信息中的错误信息和地方性的异规范是参与WSW筛查的重大障碍。为了加强妇女妇女的筛查工作,公共卫生信息需要专门针对妇女妇女的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are women-who-have-sex-with-women an 'at-risk' group for cervical cancer? An exploratory study of women in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Background: International research consistently indicates that women-who-have-sex-with-women (WSW) are less likely to engage in cervical screening than heterosexual women. In the main, studies have explored rates of engagement and highlighted some reasons for non-engagement. This study extends on this work by exploring perceptions among sexual minority women (WSW) for lower rates of engagement among WSW more generally and is the first study on this topic undertaken in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Methods: A sample of 177 self-identified WSW domiciled in New Zealand completed an online survey about their engagement in cervical screening, reasons for engaging (or not) in cervical screening, and perceptions of why SMW might be less likely to engage in cervical screening.

Results: Fewer than half of participants had engaged in cervical screening every 3years as recommended, with women who had only ever had sex with other women being significantly less likely to have engaged in screening. A lack of clear information about risk relative to sexual history, heteronormativity, and the invasive nature of screening were the dominant reasons for lower engagement among WSW.

Conclusions: A legacy of misinformation, and endemic heteronormativity in public health messaging around cervical screening is a significant barrier to engagement in screening for WSW. To increase engagement in screening among WSW, public health information needs to specifically address the needs of WSW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
期刊最新文献
A holistic evaluation of sexual health disease investigation: case study of the 2022 Mpox outbreak in Santa Clara County, California. Young people's preferences and motivations for STI partner notification: observational findings from the 2024 Sex, Drugs and Rock 'n' Roll survey. Higher female partner age and longer duration of marriage: key factors for less frequent sexual intercourse in infertile couples. Health provider perspectives on establishing service linkages for treatment and follow-up from an Australian, web-based STI testing service: a qualitative study. Factors influencing experiences of non-consensual sex: results from a mixed data cross-sectional online survey of Australian university students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1