ACP与中国和南亚患者的对话:医生对障碍和促进因素的看法。

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.26.691
Avantika Vashisht, Gloria Gutman, Taranjot Kaur
{"title":"ACP与中国和南亚患者的对话:医生对障碍和促进因素的看法。","authors":"Avantika Vashisht, Gloria Gutman, Taranjot Kaur","doi":"10.5770/cgj.26.691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions are infrequently conducted with physicians, even fewer among minorities. We explored physicians' experiences in engaging Chinese (CH) and South Asian (SA) patients in ACP conversations to understand initiation and participation patterns, topics covered, and barriers and facilitating factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-two physicians with 15%+ SA patients aged 55+ and 19 with 15%+ CH patients aged 55+ were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SA- and CH-serving physicians described similar initiation patterns, cultural context, and need for standardized ACP routines. However, the SA-serving physicians described greater involvement of family members, while CH-serving physicians described more communication barriers and family members' desire to hide the diagnosis from patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cultural taboos surrounding discussion around death and dying appear to influence CH older adults and families strongly. Lack of familiarity with ACP amongst the SA population accounts more for their limited engagement in ACP discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"26 4","pages":"486-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACP Conversations with Chinese and South Asian Patients: Physicians' Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitating Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Avantika Vashisht, Gloria Gutman, Taranjot Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.5770/cgj.26.691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions are infrequently conducted with physicians, even fewer among minorities. We explored physicians' experiences in engaging Chinese (CH) and South Asian (SA) patients in ACP conversations to understand initiation and participation patterns, topics covered, and barriers and facilitating factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-two physicians with 15%+ SA patients aged 55+ and 19 with 15%+ CH patients aged 55+ were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SA- and CH-serving physicians described similar initiation patterns, cultural context, and need for standardized ACP routines. However, the SA-serving physicians described greater involvement of family members, while CH-serving physicians described more communication barriers and family members' desire to hide the diagnosis from patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cultural taboos surrounding discussion around death and dying appear to influence CH older adults and families strongly. Lack of familiarity with ACP amongst the SA population accounts more for their limited engagement in ACP discussions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"486-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geriatrics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言/目的:预先护理计划(ACP)的讨论很少与医生进行,少数民族的讨论更少。我们探讨了医生与中国(CH)和南亚(SA)患者进行ACP对话的经验,以了解启动和参与模式、涵盖的主题以及障碍和促进因素。方法:对22名55岁以上15%+ SA患者的内科医生和19名55岁以上15%+ CH患者的内科医生进行访谈。结果:SA和ch服务的医生描述了相似的起始模式、文化背景和标准化ACP程序的需求。然而,服务于sa的医生描述了更多的家庭成员参与,而服务于ch的医生描述了更多的沟通障碍和家庭成员对患者隐瞒诊断的愿望。结论:围绕死亡和临终讨论的文化禁忌似乎强烈影响CH老年人和家庭。南非人对非加太的不熟悉是他们参与非加太讨论有限的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACP Conversations with Chinese and South Asian Patients: Physicians' Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitating Factors.

Introduction/objective: Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions are infrequently conducted with physicians, even fewer among minorities. We explored physicians' experiences in engaging Chinese (CH) and South Asian (SA) patients in ACP conversations to understand initiation and participation patterns, topics covered, and barriers and facilitating factors.

Method: Twenty-two physicians with 15%+ SA patients aged 55+ and 19 with 15%+ CH patients aged 55+ were interviewed.

Results: SA- and CH-serving physicians described similar initiation patterns, cultural context, and need for standardized ACP routines. However, the SA-serving physicians described greater involvement of family members, while CH-serving physicians described more communication barriers and family members' desire to hide the diagnosis from patients.

Conclusion: Cultural taboos surrounding discussion around death and dying appear to influence CH older adults and families strongly. Lack of familiarity with ACP amongst the SA population accounts more for their limited engagement in ACP discussions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
期刊最新文献
"How Can We Help You?" Older Adults' and Care Partners' Perspectives on Improving Care in Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review. Balancing Patients' Eating Habits with Planetary Health-Pilot Study to Decrease Food Waste with Vegetarian Lunches using a Quality Improvement Approach. Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults. Determinants of First Practice Location among Canadian Geriatric Medicine Trainees and Recent Graduates: Findings of a Cross-sectional Survey in 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1