Erik A. Hobbie , Sonja G. Keel , Tamir Klein , Ido Rog , Matthias Saurer , Rolf Siegwolf , Michael R. Routhier , Christian Körner
{"title":"追踪黑松向宿主类型、分类或菌丝发育不同的外生菌根真菌转移碳的空间范围和滞后时间","authors":"Erik A. Hobbie , Sonja G. Keel , Tamir Klein , Ido Rog , Matthias Saurer , Rolf Siegwolf , Michael R. Routhier , Christian Körner","doi":"10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We used five mature <span><span>Picea abies</span></span> continuously labeled with <sup>13</sup>C-depleted CO<sub>2</sub><span><span> in a broadleaf-dominated Swiss forest to assess the spatial extent and lag time of carbon fluxes to </span>ectomycorrhizal fungi<span> differing in hyphal development and host association. We traced labeled carbon into ectomycorrhizal sporocarps collected for two seasons at different distances from labeled </span></span><em>Picea</em>. <em>Picea</em><span>-derived photosynthate reached conifer-specific sporocarps up to 6–12 m away and reached other sporocarps only 0–6 m away. At 0–6 m, genera of lesser hyphal development acquired more </span><em>Picea</em><span><span>-derived photosynthate than those of greater hyphal development, presumably from preferential fungal colonization of inner </span>root zones by the former genera. Correlations of sporocarp δ</span><sup>13</sup>C with daily solar radiation integrated for different periods indicated that carbon fluxes from <em>Picea</em><span> to sporocarps peaked 17–21 days after photosynthesis. Thus, these results provided rough estimates of the spatial extent and temporal lags of carbon transfer from </span><em>Picea</em> to ectomycorrhizal fungi.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55136,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Ecology","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracing the spatial extent and lag time of carbon transfer from Picea abies to ectomycorrhizal fungi differing in host type, taxonomy, or hyphal development\",\"authors\":\"Erik A. Hobbie , Sonja G. Keel , Tamir Klein , Ido Rog , Matthias Saurer , Rolf Siegwolf , Michael R. Routhier , Christian Körner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We used five mature <span><span>Picea abies</span></span> continuously labeled with <sup>13</sup>C-depleted CO<sub>2</sub><span><span> in a broadleaf-dominated Swiss forest to assess the spatial extent and lag time of carbon fluxes to </span>ectomycorrhizal fungi<span> differing in hyphal development and host association. We traced labeled carbon into ectomycorrhizal sporocarps collected for two seasons at different distances from labeled </span></span><em>Picea</em>. <em>Picea</em><span>-derived photosynthate reached conifer-specific sporocarps up to 6–12 m away and reached other sporocarps only 0–6 m away. At 0–6 m, genera of lesser hyphal development acquired more </span><em>Picea</em><span><span>-derived photosynthate than those of greater hyphal development, presumably from preferential fungal colonization of inner </span>root zones by the former genera. Correlations of sporocarp δ</span><sup>13</sup>C with daily solar radiation integrated for different periods indicated that carbon fluxes from <em>Picea</em><span> to sporocarps peaked 17–21 days after photosynthesis. Thus, these results provided rough estimates of the spatial extent and temporal lags of carbon transfer from </span><em>Picea</em> to ectomycorrhizal fungi.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Ecology\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1754504823000922\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1754504823000922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tracing the spatial extent and lag time of carbon transfer from Picea abies to ectomycorrhizal fungi differing in host type, taxonomy, or hyphal development
We used five mature Picea abies continuously labeled with 13C-depleted CO2 in a broadleaf-dominated Swiss forest to assess the spatial extent and lag time of carbon fluxes to ectomycorrhizal fungi differing in hyphal development and host association. We traced labeled carbon into ectomycorrhizal sporocarps collected for two seasons at different distances from labeled Picea. Picea-derived photosynthate reached conifer-specific sporocarps up to 6–12 m away and reached other sporocarps only 0–6 m away. At 0–6 m, genera of lesser hyphal development acquired more Picea-derived photosynthate than those of greater hyphal development, presumably from preferential fungal colonization of inner root zones by the former genera. Correlations of sporocarp δ13C with daily solar radiation integrated for different periods indicated that carbon fluxes from Picea to sporocarps peaked 17–21 days after photosynthesis. Thus, these results provided rough estimates of the spatial extent and temporal lags of carbon transfer from Picea to ectomycorrhizal fungi.
期刊介绍:
Fungal Ecology publishes investigations into all aspects of fungal ecology, including the following (not exclusive): population dynamics; adaptation; evolution; role in ecosystem functioning, nutrient cycling, decomposition, carbon allocation; ecophysiology; intra- and inter-specific mycelial interactions, fungus-plant (pathogens, mycorrhizas, lichens, endophytes), fungus-invertebrate and fungus-microbe interaction; genomics and (evolutionary) genetics; conservation and biodiversity; remote sensing; bioremediation and biodegradation; quantitative and computational aspects - modelling, indicators, complexity, informatics. The usual prerequisites for publication will be originality, clarity, and significance as relevant to a better understanding of the ecology of fungi.